心肺搭桥时间与主动脉交叉钳夹时间的差异是冠状动脉搭桥术后并发症的预测因素。

Fabiano Gonçalves Jucá, Fabiane Letícia de Freitas, Maxim Goncharov, Daniella de Lima Pes, Maria Eduarda Coimbra Jucá, Luis Roberto Palma Dallan, Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Fábio B Jatene, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia
{"title":"心肺搭桥时间与主动脉交叉钳夹时间的差异是冠状动脉搭桥术后并发症的预测因素。","authors":"Fabiano Gonçalves Jucá, Fabiane Letícia de Freitas, Maxim Goncharov, Daniella de Lima Pes, Maria Eduarda Coimbra Jucá, Luis Roberto Palma Dallan, Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Fábio B Jatene, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Along with cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time is directly related to the risk of complications after heart surgery. The influence of the time difference between cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times (TDC-C) remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass time in relation to cross-clamping time on immediate results after coronary artery bypass grafting in the Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (REPLICCAR) II.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of 3,090 patients included in REPLICCAR II database was performed. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons outcomes were evaluated (mortality, kidney failure, deep wound infection, reoperation, cerebrovascular accident, and prolonged ventilation time). A cutoff point was adopted, from which the increase of this difference would affect each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a cutoff point determination, all patients were divided into Group 1 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), Group 2 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.), Group 3 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), and Group 4 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.). After univariate logistic regression, Group 2 showed significant association with reoperation (odds ratio: 1.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.66), stroke (odds ratio: 3.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.99-7.63), kidney failure (odds ratio: 1.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.74), and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 2.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDC-C serves as a predictive factor for complications following coronary artery bypass grafting. We strongly recommend that future studies incorporate this metric to improve the prediction of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903005/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difference Between Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time and Aortic Cross-Clamping Time as a Predictor of Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.\",\"authors\":\"Fabiano Gonçalves Jucá, Fabiane Letícia de Freitas, Maxim Goncharov, Daniella de Lima Pes, Maria Eduarda Coimbra Jucá, Luis Roberto Palma Dallan, Luiz Augusto Ferreira Lisboa, Fábio B Jatene, Omar Asdrúbal Vilca Mejia\",\"doi\":\"10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Along with cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time is directly related to the risk of complications after heart surgery. The influence of the time difference between cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times (TDC-C) remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass time in relation to cross-clamping time on immediate results after coronary artery bypass grafting in the Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (REPLICCAR) II.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis of 3,090 patients included in REPLICCAR II database was performed. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons outcomes were evaluated (mortality, kidney failure, deep wound infection, reoperation, cerebrovascular accident, and prolonged ventilation time). A cutoff point was adopted, from which the increase of this difference would affect each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a cutoff point determination, all patients were divided into Group 1 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), Group 2 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.), Group 3 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), and Group 4 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.). After univariate logistic regression, Group 2 showed significant association with reoperation (odds ratio: 1.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.66), stroke (odds ratio: 3.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.99-7.63), kidney failure (odds ratio: 1.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.74), and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 2.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.60).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDC-C serves as a predictive factor for complications following coronary artery bypass grafting. We strongly recommend that future studies incorporate this metric to improve the prediction of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903005/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:与心肺旁路时间一样,主动脉交叉钳夹时间与心脏手术后并发症的风险直接相关。心肺旁路时间与交叉钳夹时间之间的时间差(TDC-C)的影响仍鲜为人知:在保利斯塔心血管外科登记处(REPLICCAR)II评估心肺旁路时间与交叉钳夹时间对冠状动脉旁路移植术后即时效果的影响:对 REPLICCAR II 数据库中的 3,090 名患者进行了分析。方法:对纳入 REPLICCAR II 数据库的 3,090 名患者进行了分析,评估了胸外科医师协会的结果(死亡率、肾衰竭、伤口深度感染、再次手术、脑血管意外和通气时间延长)。采用了一个临界点,从这个临界点开始,这一差异的增加将影响每项结果:确定分界点后,所有患者被分为第 1 组(心肺旁路时间 < 140 分钟,TDC-C < 30 分钟)、第 2 组(心肺旁路时间 < 140 分钟,TDC-C > 30 分钟)、第 3 组(心肺旁路时间 > 140 分钟,TDC-C < 30 分钟)和第 4 组(心肺旁路时间 > 140 分钟,TDC-C > 30 分钟)。经过单变量逻辑回归,第 2 组与再次手术(几率比:1.64,95% 置信区间:1.01-2.66)、中风(几率比:3.85,95% 置信区间:1.99-7.63)、肾衰竭(几率比:1.90,95% 置信区间:1.32-2.74)和院内死亡率(几率比:2.17,95% 置信区间:1.30-3.60)有显著相关性:结论:TDC-C 是冠状动脉旁路移植术后并发症的预测因素。结论:TDC-C 是冠状动脉旁路移植术后并发症的预测因素,我们强烈建议今后的研究纳入这一指标,以改善并发症的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Difference Between Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time and Aortic Cross-Clamping Time as a Predictor of Complications After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

Introduction: Along with cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamping time is directly related to the risk of complications after heart surgery. The influence of the time difference between cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times (TDC-C) remains poorly understood.

Objective: To assess the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass time in relation to cross-clamping time on immediate results after coronary artery bypass grafting in the Registro Paulista de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (REPLICCAR) II.

Methods: Analysis of 3,090 patients included in REPLICCAR II database was performed. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons outcomes were evaluated (mortality, kidney failure, deep wound infection, reoperation, cerebrovascular accident, and prolonged ventilation time). A cutoff point was adopted, from which the increase of this difference would affect each outcome.

Results: After a cutoff point determination, all patients were divided into Group 1 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), Group 2 (cardiopulmonary bypass time < 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.), Group 3 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C < 30 min.), and Group 4 (cardiopulmonary bypass time > 140 min., TDC-C > 30 min.). After univariate logistic regression, Group 2 showed significant association with reoperation (odds ratio: 1.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.01-2.66), stroke (odds ratio: 3.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.99-7.63), kidney failure (odds ratio: 1.90, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-2.74), and in-hospital mortality (odds ratio: 2.17, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.60).

Conclusion: TDC-C serves as a predictive factor for complications following coronary artery bypass grafting. We strongly recommend that future studies incorporate this metric to improve the prediction of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信