以人为本,纵向调查员工对工作中的挑战和阻碍需求的多维感知。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2024.2324252
Nicolas Gillet, Alexandre J S Morin, Claude Fernet, Stéphanie Austin, Tiphaine Huyghebaert-Zouaghi
{"title":"以人为本,纵向调查员工对工作中的挑战和阻碍需求的多维感知。","authors":"Nicolas Gillet, Alexandre J S Morin, Claude Fernet, Stéphanie Austin, Tiphaine Huyghebaert-Zouaghi","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2024.2324252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This research relies on a combination of variable- and person-centered approaches to help improve our understanding of the dimensionality of job demands by jointly considering employees' global levels of job demands, exposure and their specific levels of exposure to challenge and hindrance demands.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We relied on a sample of 442 workers who completed a questionnaire twice over three months. Our analyses sought to identify the nature of the job demands profiles experienced by these workers, to document the stability of these profiles over time, and to assess their associations with theoretically-relevant outcomes (i.e., work engagement, job boredom, problem-solving pondering, work-related rumination, proactive health behaviors, and sleep quality and quantity). Furthermore, we examined whether these profiles and associations differed as a function of working remotely or onsite.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five profiles were identified and found to be highly stable over time: Globally Exposed, Not Exposed, Not Exposed but Challenged, Exposed but Not Challenged, and Mixed. These profiles shared clear associations with all outcomes, with the most adaptive outcomes associated with the Exposed but Not Challenged profile, whereas the most detrimental ones were observed in the Mixed profile. However, none of these results differed across employees working onsite and those working remotely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings have theoretical and practical implications regarding the effects of work characteristics on employees' functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"558-586"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A longitudinal person-centered investigation of the multidimensional nature of employees' perceptions of challenge and hindrance demands at work.\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Gillet, Alexandre J S Morin, Claude Fernet, Stéphanie Austin, Tiphaine Huyghebaert-Zouaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2024.2324252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>This research relies on a combination of variable- and person-centered approaches to help improve our understanding of the dimensionality of job demands by jointly considering employees' global levels of job demands, exposure and their specific levels of exposure to challenge and hindrance demands.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>We relied on a sample of 442 workers who completed a questionnaire twice over three months. Our analyses sought to identify the nature of the job demands profiles experienced by these workers, to document the stability of these profiles over time, and to assess their associations with theoretically-relevant outcomes (i.e., work engagement, job boredom, problem-solving pondering, work-related rumination, proactive health behaviors, and sleep quality and quantity). Furthermore, we examined whether these profiles and associations differed as a function of working remotely or onsite.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five profiles were identified and found to be highly stable over time: Globally Exposed, Not Exposed, Not Exposed but Challenged, Exposed but Not Challenged, and Mixed. These profiles shared clear associations with all outcomes, with the most adaptive outcomes associated with the Exposed but Not Challenged profile, whereas the most detrimental ones were observed in the Mixed profile. However, none of these results differed across employees working onsite and those working remotely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings have theoretical and practical implications regarding the effects of work characteristics on employees' functioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"558-586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2324252\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2324252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:本研究结合了以变量为中心和以人为中心的方法,通过共同考虑员工的总体工作需求水平、暴露程度以及他们在挑战和阻碍需求方面的具体暴露程度,帮助我们更好地理解工作需求的维度:我们对 442 名员工进行了抽样调查,这些员工在三个月内完成了两次问卷调查。我们的分析旨在确定这些工人所经历的工作要求概况的性质,记录这些概况随时间变化的稳定性,并评估它们与理论相关结果(即工作投入度、工作厌倦感、解决问题的思考、与工作相关的反刍、主动健康行为以及睡眠质量和数量)之间的关联。此外,我们还研究了这些特征和关联是否因远程工作或现场工作而有所不同:结果:我们确定了五种特征,并发现它们随着时间的推移高度稳定:结果:我们确定了五种情况,并发现这五种情况随着时间的推移高度稳定:全球暴露、未暴露、未暴露但面临挑战、暴露但未面临挑战和混合型。这些特征与所有结果都有明显的关联,其中适应性最强的结果与 "暴露但未受到挑战 "特征相关,而最有害的结果则出现在 "混合 "特征中。然而,这些结果在现场工作的员工和远程工作的员工之间都没有差异:这些研究结果对于工作特征对员工职能的影响具有理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A longitudinal person-centered investigation of the multidimensional nature of employees' perceptions of challenge and hindrance demands at work.

Background and objectives: This research relies on a combination of variable- and person-centered approaches to help improve our understanding of the dimensionality of job demands by jointly considering employees' global levels of job demands, exposure and their specific levels of exposure to challenge and hindrance demands.

Design and methods: We relied on a sample of 442 workers who completed a questionnaire twice over three months. Our analyses sought to identify the nature of the job demands profiles experienced by these workers, to document the stability of these profiles over time, and to assess their associations with theoretically-relevant outcomes (i.e., work engagement, job boredom, problem-solving pondering, work-related rumination, proactive health behaviors, and sleep quality and quantity). Furthermore, we examined whether these profiles and associations differed as a function of working remotely or onsite.

Results: Five profiles were identified and found to be highly stable over time: Globally Exposed, Not Exposed, Not Exposed but Challenged, Exposed but Not Challenged, and Mixed. These profiles shared clear associations with all outcomes, with the most adaptive outcomes associated with the Exposed but Not Challenged profile, whereas the most detrimental ones were observed in the Mixed profile. However, none of these results differed across employees working onsite and those working remotely.

Conclusions: These findings have theoretical and practical implications regarding the effects of work characteristics on employees' functioning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信