J. Mithen, D. Archibald, P. Begnell, D. Thomson, H. Vally
{"title":"对墨尔本东北部促进健康饮料消费的集体影响伙伴关系的见解:定性案例研究。","authors":"J. Mithen, D. Archibald, P. Begnell, D. Thomson, H. Vally","doi":"10.1002/hpja.852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>To explore insights and perspectives of a collective impact (CI) partnership taking on a new project that aimed to reduce sugary drink consumption and promote water as the drink of choice across North East Melbourne.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A qualitative case study was undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in the partnership. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen organisations participated in the North East Healthy Drinks Alliance. The data demonstrated that investing in developing a common agenda supported the establishment of a CI approach. The backbone organisation was found to have played a crucial role in coordinating the activities of the Alliance. This coordination was found to be particularly important in terms of ensuring that organisations were able to work on mutually reinforcing activities at their own pace. Program planning and reporting was managed through open continuous communication by the backbone organisation. The data collected pertains to the activities of the Alliance in its first 2 years, prior to the development of a shared measurement strategy, thus no data was collected on this aspect of the collective impact framework. Although some participants were found to have limited knowledge of CI, this did not seem to hinder their participation in the Alliance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Selecting a relevant and accessible focus area and investing in developing a common agenda supported the establishment of a CI approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>The CI framework offers a valuable tool for undertaking cross-sectoral, local partnerships for health.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"35 4","pages":"1224-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.852","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insights into a collective impact partnership to promote consumption of healthy drinks in North East Melbourne: A qualitative case study\",\"authors\":\"J. Mithen, D. Archibald, P. Begnell, D. Thomson, H. Vally\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore insights and perspectives of a collective impact (CI) partnership taking on a new project that aimed to reduce sugary drink consumption and promote water as the drink of choice across North East Melbourne.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A qualitative case study was undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in the partnership. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Fourteen organisations participated in the North East Healthy Drinks Alliance. The data demonstrated that investing in developing a common agenda supported the establishment of a CI approach. The backbone organisation was found to have played a crucial role in coordinating the activities of the Alliance. This coordination was found to be particularly important in terms of ensuring that organisations were able to work on mutually reinforcing activities at their own pace. Program planning and reporting was managed through open continuous communication by the backbone organisation. The data collected pertains to the activities of the Alliance in its first 2 years, prior to the development of a shared measurement strategy, thus no data was collected on this aspect of the collective impact framework. Although some participants were found to have limited knowledge of CI, this did not seem to hinder their participation in the Alliance.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Selecting a relevant and accessible focus area and investing in developing a common agenda supported the establishment of a CI approach.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> So What?</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CI framework offers a valuable tool for undertaking cross-sectoral, local partnerships for health.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"1224-1230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hpja.852\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Insights into a collective impact partnership to promote consumption of healthy drinks in North East Melbourne: A qualitative case study
Issue Addressed
To explore insights and perspectives of a collective impact (CI) partnership taking on a new project that aimed to reduce sugary drink consumption and promote water as the drink of choice across North East Melbourne.
Methods
A qualitative case study was undertaken. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders in the partnership. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
Results
Fourteen organisations participated in the North East Healthy Drinks Alliance. The data demonstrated that investing in developing a common agenda supported the establishment of a CI approach. The backbone organisation was found to have played a crucial role in coordinating the activities of the Alliance. This coordination was found to be particularly important in terms of ensuring that organisations were able to work on mutually reinforcing activities at their own pace. Program planning and reporting was managed through open continuous communication by the backbone organisation. The data collected pertains to the activities of the Alliance in its first 2 years, prior to the development of a shared measurement strategy, thus no data was collected on this aspect of the collective impact framework. Although some participants were found to have limited knowledge of CI, this did not seem to hinder their participation in the Alliance.
Conclusion
Selecting a relevant and accessible focus area and investing in developing a common agenda supported the establishment of a CI approach.
So What?
The CI framework offers a valuable tool for undertaking cross-sectoral, local partnerships for health.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.