{"title":"利用医疗保健索赔数据为耐药性癫痫患者提供现实世界的证据:研究的实际考虑因素。","authors":"Nicole Stamas, Tom Vincent, Kathryn Evans, Qian Li, Vanessa Danielson, Reginald Lassagne, Ariel Berger","doi":"10.36469/001c.91991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Regulatory bodies, health technology assessment agencies, payers, physicians, and other decision-makers increasingly recognize the importance of real-world evidence (RWE) to provide important and relevant insights on treatment patterns, burden/cost of illness, product safety, and long-term and comparative effectiveness. However, RWE generation requires a careful approach to ensure rigorous analysis and interpretation. There are limited examples of comprehensive methodology for the generation of RWE on patients who have undergone neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This is likely due, at least in part, to the many challenges inherent in using real-world data to define DRE, neuromodulation (including type implanted), and related outcomes of interest. We sought to provide recommendations to enable generation of robust RWE that can increase knowledge of \"real-world\" patients with DRE and help inform the difficult decisions regarding treatment choices and reimbursement for this particularly vulnerable population. <b>Methods:</b> We drew upon our collective decades of experience in RWE generation and relevant disciplines (epidemiology, health economics, and biostatistics) to describe challenges inherent to this therapeutic area and to provide potential solutions thereto within healthcare claims databases. Several examples were provided from our experiences in DRE to further illustrate our recommendations for generation of robust RWE in this therapeutic area. <b>Results:</b> Our recommendations focus on considerations for the selection of an appropriate data source, development of a study timeline, exposure allotment (specifically, neuromodulation implantation for patients with DRE), and ascertainment of relevant outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> The need for RWE to inform healthcare decisions has never been greater and continues to grow in importance to regulators, payers, physicians, and other key stakeholders. However, as real-world data sources used to generate RWE are typically generated for reasons other than research, rigorous methodology is required to minimize bias and fully unlock their value.</p>","PeriodicalId":16012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","volume":"11 1","pages":"57-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Healthcare Claims Data to Generate Real-World Evidence on Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Practical Considerations for Research.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Stamas, Tom Vincent, Kathryn Evans, Qian Li, Vanessa Danielson, Reginald Lassagne, Ariel Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.36469/001c.91991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> Regulatory bodies, health technology assessment agencies, payers, physicians, and other decision-makers increasingly recognize the importance of real-world evidence (RWE) to provide important and relevant insights on treatment patterns, burden/cost of illness, product safety, and long-term and comparative effectiveness. However, RWE generation requires a careful approach to ensure rigorous analysis and interpretation. There are limited examples of comprehensive methodology for the generation of RWE on patients who have undergone neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This is likely due, at least in part, to the many challenges inherent in using real-world data to define DRE, neuromodulation (including type implanted), and related outcomes of interest. We sought to provide recommendations to enable generation of robust RWE that can increase knowledge of \\\"real-world\\\" patients with DRE and help inform the difficult decisions regarding treatment choices and reimbursement for this particularly vulnerable population. <b>Methods:</b> We drew upon our collective decades of experience in RWE generation and relevant disciplines (epidemiology, health economics, and biostatistics) to describe challenges inherent to this therapeutic area and to provide potential solutions thereto within healthcare claims databases. Several examples were provided from our experiences in DRE to further illustrate our recommendations for generation of robust RWE in this therapeutic area. <b>Results:</b> Our recommendations focus on considerations for the selection of an appropriate data source, development of a study timeline, exposure allotment (specifically, neuromodulation implantation for patients with DRE), and ascertainment of relevant outcomes. <b>Conclusions:</b> The need for RWE to inform healthcare decisions has never been greater and continues to grow in importance to regulators, payers, physicians, and other key stakeholders. However, as real-world data sources used to generate RWE are typically generated for reasons other than research, rigorous methodology is required to minimize bias and fully unlock their value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"57-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10903709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.91991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.91991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目标:监管机构、卫生技术评估机构、付款人、医生和其他决策者越来越认识到真实世界证据(RWE)的重要性,它能为治疗模式、疾病负担/成本、产品安全性、长期和比较效果提供重要的相关见解。然而,RWE 的生成需要谨慎的方法,以确保严格的分析和解释。针对接受神经调控治疗耐药癫痫(DRE)的患者生成 RWE 的综合方法实例非常有限。这可能至少部分是由于使用真实世界的数据来定义 DRE、神经调控(包括植入的类型)和相关结果本身就存在许多挑战。我们试图提供一些建议,以便生成可靠的 RWE,从而增加对 "真实世界 "中 DRE 患者的了解,并帮助就这一特别脆弱人群的治疗选择和报销问题做出艰难的决定。方法:我们利用在 RWE 生成和相关学科(流行病学、卫生经济学和生物统计学)方面积累的数十年经验,描述了这一治疗领域固有的挑战,并提供了在医疗索赔数据库中可能的解决方案。我们还从 DRE 的经验中提供了几个例子,进一步说明我们在该治疗领域生成强大 RWE 的建议。结果:我们的建议侧重于选择合适的数据源、制定研究时间表、暴露分配(特别是 DRE 患者的神经调控植入)以及确定相关结果等方面的考虑因素。结论:现在比以往任何时候都更需要 RWE 为医疗决策提供信息,而且对于监管机构、付款人、医生和其他主要利益相关者来说,RWE 的重要性还在不断增加。然而,由于用于生成 RWE 的真实世界数据源通常是出于研究以外的原因而生成的,因此需要采用严格的方法来尽量减少偏差并充分释放其价值。
Use of Healthcare Claims Data to Generate Real-World Evidence on Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: Practical Considerations for Research.
Objectives: Regulatory bodies, health technology assessment agencies, payers, physicians, and other decision-makers increasingly recognize the importance of real-world evidence (RWE) to provide important and relevant insights on treatment patterns, burden/cost of illness, product safety, and long-term and comparative effectiveness. However, RWE generation requires a careful approach to ensure rigorous analysis and interpretation. There are limited examples of comprehensive methodology for the generation of RWE on patients who have undergone neuromodulation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This is likely due, at least in part, to the many challenges inherent in using real-world data to define DRE, neuromodulation (including type implanted), and related outcomes of interest. We sought to provide recommendations to enable generation of robust RWE that can increase knowledge of "real-world" patients with DRE and help inform the difficult decisions regarding treatment choices and reimbursement for this particularly vulnerable population. Methods: We drew upon our collective decades of experience in RWE generation and relevant disciplines (epidemiology, health economics, and biostatistics) to describe challenges inherent to this therapeutic area and to provide potential solutions thereto within healthcare claims databases. Several examples were provided from our experiences in DRE to further illustrate our recommendations for generation of robust RWE in this therapeutic area. Results: Our recommendations focus on considerations for the selection of an appropriate data source, development of a study timeline, exposure allotment (specifically, neuromodulation implantation for patients with DRE), and ascertainment of relevant outcomes. Conclusions: The need for RWE to inform healthcare decisions has never been greater and continues to grow in importance to regulators, payers, physicians, and other key stakeholders. However, as real-world data sources used to generate RWE are typically generated for reasons other than research, rigorous methodology is required to minimize bias and fully unlock their value.