公共物品博弈中纳什均衡的严密不可逼近性

IF 0.7 4区 计算机科学 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jérémi Do Dinh , Alexandros Hollender
{"title":"公共物品博弈中纳什均衡的严密不可逼近性","authors":"Jérémi Do Dinh ,&nbsp;Alexandros Hollender","doi":"10.1016/j.ipl.2024.106486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study public goods games, a type of game where every player has to decide whether or not to produce a good which is <em>public</em>, i.e., neighboring players can also benefit from it. Specifically, we consider a setting where the good is indivisible and where the neighborhood structure is represented by a directed graph, with the players being the nodes. Papadimitriou and Peng (2023) recently showed that in this setting computing mixed Nash equilibria is <span>PPAD</span>-hard, and that this remains the case even for <em>ε</em>-well-supported approximate equilibria for some sufficiently small constant <em>ε</em>. In this work, we strengthen this inapproximability result by showing that the problem remains <span>PPAD</span>-hard for any non-trivial approximation parameter <em>ε</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56290,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing Letters","volume":"186 ","pages":"Article 106486"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019024000164/pdfft?md5=4401d2c9ad85ff27d95ed156a73d6f7a&pid=1-s2.0-S0020019024000164-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tight inapproximability of Nash equilibria in public goods games\",\"authors\":\"Jérémi Do Dinh ,&nbsp;Alexandros Hollender\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ipl.2024.106486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study public goods games, a type of game where every player has to decide whether or not to produce a good which is <em>public</em>, i.e., neighboring players can also benefit from it. Specifically, we consider a setting where the good is indivisible and where the neighborhood structure is represented by a directed graph, with the players being the nodes. Papadimitriou and Peng (2023) recently showed that in this setting computing mixed Nash equilibria is <span>PPAD</span>-hard, and that this remains the case even for <em>ε</em>-well-supported approximate equilibria for some sufficiently small constant <em>ε</em>. In this work, we strengthen this inapproximability result by showing that the problem remains <span>PPAD</span>-hard for any non-trivial approximation parameter <em>ε</em>.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Processing Letters\",\"volume\":\"186 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019024000164/pdfft?md5=4401d2c9ad85ff27d95ed156a73d6f7a&pid=1-s2.0-S0020019024000164-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Processing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019024000164\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020019024000164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究的是公共物品博弈,在这种博弈中,每个博弈者都必须决定是否生产一种公共物品,即邻近的博弈者也能从中受益。具体来说,我们考虑的情况是:物品不可分割,邻里结构由有向图表示,博弈者是节点。Papadimitriou 和 Peng(2023 年)最近指出,在这种情况下,计算混合纳什均衡是 PPAD 难的,而且即使对于某个足够小的常数 ε,ε 支持的近似均衡也仍然如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tight inapproximability of Nash equilibria in public goods games

We study public goods games, a type of game where every player has to decide whether or not to produce a good which is public, i.e., neighboring players can also benefit from it. Specifically, we consider a setting where the good is indivisible and where the neighborhood structure is represented by a directed graph, with the players being the nodes. Papadimitriou and Peng (2023) recently showed that in this setting computing mixed Nash equilibria is PPAD-hard, and that this remains the case even for ε-well-supported approximate equilibria for some sufficiently small constant ε. In this work, we strengthen this inapproximability result by showing that the problem remains PPAD-hard for any non-trivial approximation parameter ε.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Processing Letters
Information Processing Letters 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Information Processing Letters invites submission of original research articles that focus on fundamental aspects of information processing and computing. This naturally includes work in the broadly understood field of theoretical computer science; although papers in all areas of scientific inquiry will be given consideration, provided that they describe research contributions credibly motivated by applications to computing and involve rigorous methodology. High quality experimental papers that address topics of sufficiently broad interest may also be considered. Since its inception in 1971, Information Processing Letters has served as a forum for timely dissemination of short, concise and focused research contributions. Continuing with this tradition, and to expedite the reviewing process, manuscripts are generally limited in length to nine pages when they appear in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信