[锥形束 CT 剂量评估方法标准化研究]。

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2024-04-20 Epub Date: 2024-02-28 DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435
Ryo Nakayama, Kosuke Matsubara
{"title":"[锥形束 CT 剂量评估方法标准化研究]。","authors":"Ryo Nakayama, Kosuke Matsubara","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the dose evaluation methods by constructing simulation models using the Monte Carlo calculation code and propose an evaluation method for cone beam CT (CBCT) that ensures accuracy and practicality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) ver. 3.26 was used as the Monte Carlo calculation code. CBCT doses were measured by CB dose index (CBDI) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 111 (TG111) methods. The CBDI was compared with the equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although CBDI was lower than equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method, its practicality was ensured because it can be measured using the dosimeter and phantom that are commonly used. In contrast, the TG111 method guarantees accuracy, but it is difficult to prepare a long phantom to obtain the equilibrium dose. The TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm underestimated the equilibrium dose by 20% compared to that with a phantom length of 45 cm that satisfies the dose equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dose obtained by the TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm is multiplied by 1.20 to obtain the equilibrium dose equivalent to that with a phantom length of 45 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has proposed the dose evaluation method that combines guarantees accuracy and practicality in CBCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Study for Standardization of Dose Evaluation Method in Cone-beam CT].\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Nakayama, Kosuke Matsubara\",\"doi\":\"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the dose evaluation methods by constructing simulation models using the Monte Carlo calculation code and propose an evaluation method for cone beam CT (CBCT) that ensures accuracy and practicality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) ver. 3.26 was used as the Monte Carlo calculation code. CBCT doses were measured by CB dose index (CBDI) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 111 (TG111) methods. The CBDI was compared with the equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although CBDI was lower than equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method, its practicality was ensured because it can be measured using the dosimeter and phantom that are commonly used. In contrast, the TG111 method guarantees accuracy, but it is difficult to prepare a long phantom to obtain the equilibrium dose. The TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm underestimated the equilibrium dose by 20% compared to that with a phantom length of 45 cm that satisfies the dose equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dose obtained by the TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm is multiplied by 1.20 to obtain the equilibrium dose equivalent to that with a phantom length of 45 cm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has proposed the dose evaluation method that combines guarantees accuracy and practicality in CBCT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1435","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过使用蒙特卡洛计算代码构建模拟模型,对剂量评估方法进行比较,并提出一种确保准确性和实用性的锥形束 CT(CBCT)评估方法:方法:采用粒子和重离子输运代码系统(PHITS)3.26 版作为蒙特卡洛计算模型。方法:使用粒子和重离子传输代码系统(PHITS)3.26 版作为蒙特卡罗计算代码。CBCT 剂量通过 CB 剂量指数(CBDI)和美国医学物理学家协会第 111 任务组(TG111)方法进行测量。CBDI 与 TG111 方法得出的平衡剂量进行了比较:尽管 CBDI 低于 TG111 方法获得的平衡剂量,但其实用性得到了保证,因为它可以使用常用的剂量计和模型进行测量。相比之下,TG111 方法虽然能保证精确度,但很难准备一个长模型来获得平衡剂量。与满足剂量平衡的 45 厘米幻影长度相比,15 厘米幻影长度的 TG111 方法低估了 20% 的平衡剂量。因此,用 TG111 方法得到的幻影长度为 15 厘米的平衡剂量乘以 1.20,就得到了相当于幻影长度为 45 厘米的平衡剂量:本研究提出的剂量评估方法兼顾了 CBCT 的准确性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Study for Standardization of Dose Evaluation Method in Cone-beam CT].

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the dose evaluation methods by constructing simulation models using the Monte Carlo calculation code and propose an evaluation method for cone beam CT (CBCT) that ensures accuracy and practicality.

Methods: The Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) ver. 3.26 was used as the Monte Carlo calculation code. CBCT doses were measured by CB dose index (CBDI) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine task group 111 (TG111) methods. The CBDI was compared with the equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method.

Results: Although CBDI was lower than equilibrium doses obtained by the TG111 method, its practicality was ensured because it can be measured using the dosimeter and phantom that are commonly used. In contrast, the TG111 method guarantees accuracy, but it is difficult to prepare a long phantom to obtain the equilibrium dose. The TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm underestimated the equilibrium dose by 20% compared to that with a phantom length of 45 cm that satisfies the dose equilibrium. Therefore, the equilibrium dose obtained by the TG111 method with a phantom length of 15 cm is multiplied by 1.20 to obtain the equilibrium dose equivalent to that with a phantom length of 45 cm.

Conclusion: This study has proposed the dose evaluation method that combines guarantees accuracy and practicality in CBCT.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信