[Robotic-Assisted DIEP Flap Harvest for Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Case Report, Technical Aspects and Identification of Suitable Patients].

Background: Robotic-assisted harvest of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is an innovative modification of the traditional open preparation for autologous breast reconstruction. It is assumed that donor-site morbidity (herniae, bulging) is reduced by minimising the fascial incision length in robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest.

Material & methods: This is the first report of a robotic-assisted DIEP harvest in Germany, which was performed in April 2023 at the University Hospital of Freiburg in an interdisciplinary approach of the Departments of Plastic Surgery, Urology and Gynaecology. To determine the value of this novel technique, we assessed the demand by retrospectively performing an analysis of potential patients and conducted a cost analysis based on the breast reconstructions with DIEP flap harvest performed between April 2021 and May 2023 at the Department of Plastic Surgery at Freiburg University Hospital. To this end, we carried out a retrospective analysis of preoperative CT angiographies to determine the proportion of patients suitable for a robotic-assisted procedure in a post-hoc analysis. Furthermore, we describe the basic robotic-assisted techniques and discuss the TEP and TAPP laparoscopic approaches.

Results: In line with the previously published literature, a short intramuscular course (≤25 mm) and a perforator diameter of≥1.5 mm and≥2.7 mm (subgroup) were defined as a crucial condition for the robotic-assisted procedure. We analysed 65 DIEP flaps harvested in 51 patients, of which 26 DIEP flaps in 22 patients met both criteria, i. e.≤25 mm intramuscular course and≥1.5 mm diameter of the perforator, while 10 DIEP flaps in 10 patients additionally met the criteria of the subgroup (≥2.7 mm diameter). Based on the intramuscular course of the perforators in the CT angiographies of those 26 DIEP flaps, a potential reduction of the fascial incision of 96.8±25.21 mm (mean±standard deviation) compared with the conventional surgical approach was calculated. The additional material costs in our case were EUR 986.01. However, ischaemia time was 33,5 minutes longer than the median of the comparative cohort.

Conclusion: The robotic-assisted procedure has already proven to be a feasible alternative in a suitable patient population. However, further studies are needed to confirm that robotic-assisted DIEP flap harvest actually reduces harvest site morbidity and thereby justifies the additional costs and complexity.