[德国护士的职业健康素养:横断面定量调查结果]。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 NURSING
Pflege Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1024/1012-5302/a000982
Doris Schaeffer, Alexander Haarmann, Lennert Griese
{"title":"[德国护士的职业健康素养:横断面定量调查结果]。","authors":"Doris Schaeffer, Alexander Haarmann, Lennert Griese","doi":"10.1024/1012-5302/a000982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Professional health literacy among nurses in Germany: Results of a quantitative, cross-sectional survey <b>Abstract.</b> <i>Background:</i> Little is known about the professional health literacy (HL) of nurses, i.e., how well they are able to promote patients' HL. Existing studies have focused on personal HL, which does not entirely align with professional HL. Therefore, a new concept and questionnaire for professional HL have been developed and implemented for the first time. The results obtained for nurses in Germany are analysed with this article. <i>Research question:</i> It is asked how professional health literacy (HL) is distributed among nurses and which factors are associated with it. <i>Methods:</i> Data were collected through an online survey where nurses were asked about the difficulties they encounter in managing tasks in four dimensions: (1) information and knowledge management, (2) explaining and conveying information, (3) patient-centered communication, and (4) professional digital health literacy. Descriptive and multivariate, linear regression methods were used for analysis. <i>Results:</i> The 624 respondents rated the fourth dimension as the most difficult. The first and second dimensions were rated as similarly difficult, while the third dimension was considered least difficult. Higher professional HL is linked to better self-assessed training and framework conditions. <i>Conclusion:</i> Despite a relatively positive self-assessment, the results indicate areas that require improvement and should be addressed urgently.</p>","PeriodicalId":54625,"journal":{"name":"Pflege","volume":" ","pages":"72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Professional health literacy among nurses in Germany: Results of a quantitative, cross-sectional survey].\",\"authors\":\"Doris Schaeffer, Alexander Haarmann, Lennert Griese\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/1012-5302/a000982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Professional health literacy among nurses in Germany: Results of a quantitative, cross-sectional survey <b>Abstract.</b> <i>Background:</i> Little is known about the professional health literacy (HL) of nurses, i.e., how well they are able to promote patients' HL. Existing studies have focused on personal HL, which does not entirely align with professional HL. Therefore, a new concept and questionnaire for professional HL have been developed and implemented for the first time. The results obtained for nurses in Germany are analysed with this article. <i>Research question:</i> It is asked how professional health literacy (HL) is distributed among nurses and which factors are associated with it. <i>Methods:</i> Data were collected through an online survey where nurses were asked about the difficulties they encounter in managing tasks in four dimensions: (1) information and knowledge management, (2) explaining and conveying information, (3) patient-centered communication, and (4) professional digital health literacy. Descriptive and multivariate, linear regression methods were used for analysis. <i>Results:</i> The 624 respondents rated the fourth dimension as the most difficult. The first and second dimensions were rated as similarly difficult, while the third dimension was considered least difficult. Higher professional HL is linked to better self-assessed training and framework conditions. <i>Conclusion:</i> Despite a relatively positive self-assessment, the results indicate areas that require improvement and should be addressed urgently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pflege\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"72-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pflege\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000982\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflege","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1012-5302/a000982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

德国护士的职业健康素养:横断面定量调查结果 摘要。背景:人们对护士的专业健康素养(HL),即她们促进患者健康素养的能力知之甚少。现有研究侧重于个人健康素养,而个人健康素养与专业健康素养并不完全一致。因此,我们首次针对职业健康素养制定并实施了新的概念和调查问卷。本文对德国护士的调查结果进行了分析。研究问题:专业健康素养(HL)在护士中的分布情况以及与之相关的因素。研究方法:通过在线调查收集数据,从四个方面询问护士在管理任务时遇到的困难:(1) 信息和知识管理;(2) 解释和传递信息;(3) 以患者为中心的沟通;(4) 专业数字健康素养。分析采用了描述性方法和多变量线性回归方法。结果:624 名受访者认为第四个维度最难。第一和第二维度被评为难度相似,而第三维度被认为难度最低。较高的专业 HL 与较好的自我评估培训和框架条件有关。结论尽管自我评估相对积极,但结果显示了需要改进的领域,应立即加以解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Professional health literacy among nurses in Germany: Results of a quantitative, cross-sectional survey].

Professional health literacy among nurses in Germany: Results of a quantitative, cross-sectional survey Abstract. Background: Little is known about the professional health literacy (HL) of nurses, i.e., how well they are able to promote patients' HL. Existing studies have focused on personal HL, which does not entirely align with professional HL. Therefore, a new concept and questionnaire for professional HL have been developed and implemented for the first time. The results obtained for nurses in Germany are analysed with this article. Research question: It is asked how professional health literacy (HL) is distributed among nurses and which factors are associated with it. Methods: Data were collected through an online survey where nurses were asked about the difficulties they encounter in managing tasks in four dimensions: (1) information and knowledge management, (2) explaining and conveying information, (3) patient-centered communication, and (4) professional digital health literacy. Descriptive and multivariate, linear regression methods were used for analysis. Results: The 624 respondents rated the fourth dimension as the most difficult. The first and second dimensions were rated as similarly difficult, while the third dimension was considered least difficult. Higher professional HL is linked to better self-assessed training and framework conditions. Conclusion: Despite a relatively positive self-assessment, the results indicate areas that require improvement and should be addressed urgently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pflege
Pflege NURSING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflege ist die erste unabhängige wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für die Gesundheits- und Krankenpflege im deutschen Sprachbereich. Sie trägt zur Entwicklung der Pflegewissenschaft sowie zur Qualität der Pflege in der Praxis bei. Die Zeitschrift versteht sich als umfassendes Forum, in welchem die sich rasch entwickelnden Bereiche der Pflegeforschung, -theorie und -praxis sowie der Ausbildung, des Managements, der Ethik, Geschichte und Politik der Pflege diskutiert werden können. Zusammenfassungen von Forschungsberichten und Mitteilungen aus der internationalen Pflegeszene, Buchbesprechungen und der internationale Kongresskalender ermöglichen der Leserschaft, sich einen Überblick über das aktuelle Geschehen zu verschaffen, sich bezüglich berufsspezifischer Literatur auf dem Laufenden zu halten, um somit die Weiterbildung gezielt zu gestalten. Pflege publiziert Beiträge, die eine hohe Relevanz für Praxis, Forschung, Theorie, Ausbildung, Ethik, Geschichte, Politik und das Management in der Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum haben. Manuskripte ohne Bezug zur Pflege im deutschsprachigen Raum werden abgelehnt.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信