{"title":"活动性癌症患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术的中期疗效。","authors":"Masahiko Noguchi, Minoru Tabata, Joji Ito, Nahoko Kato, Kotaro Obunai, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Fumiaki Yashima, Yusuke Watanabe, Toru Naganuma, Masahiro Yamawaki, Futoshi Yamanaka, Shinichi Shirai, Hiroshi Ueno, Norio Tada, Masanori Yamamoto, Kentaro Hayashida","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2023-002573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of TAVR in patients diagnosed with AS and active cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the OCEAN-TAVI, a prospective Japanese registry of TAVR procedures, was analysed to compare prognoses and clinical outcomes in patients with and without active cancer at the time of TAVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2336 patients who underwent TAVR from October 2013 to July 2017, 89 patients (3.8%) had active cancer, whereas 2247 did not. Among patients with active cancer, 49 had limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). The prevalent cancers identified before TAVR were colon (21%), prostate (18%), lung (15%), liver (11%) and breast (9%). Although the periprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rates were comparable between the groups, the 3-year survival rate after TAVR was notably lower in patients with active cancer (64.7%) than in those without active cancer (74.7%; p=0.016). Nevertheless, the 3-year survival rate of patients with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2) did not significantly differ from those without cancer (70.6% vs 74.7%, p=0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patients with active cancer exhibited significantly reduced midterm survival rates. However, no distinct disparity existed in those with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). Although TAVR is a viable treatment in patients with AS with active cancer, the type and stage of cancer and prognosis should be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with active cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiko Noguchi, Minoru Tabata, Joji Ito, Nahoko Kato, Kotaro Obunai, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Fumiaki Yashima, Yusuke Watanabe, Toru Naganuma, Masahiro Yamawaki, Futoshi Yamanaka, Shinichi Shirai, Hiroshi Ueno, Norio Tada, Masanori Yamamoto, Kentaro Hayashida\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2023-002573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of TAVR in patients diagnosed with AS and active cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the OCEAN-TAVI, a prospective Japanese registry of TAVR procedures, was analysed to compare prognoses and clinical outcomes in patients with and without active cancer at the time of TAVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2336 patients who underwent TAVR from October 2013 to July 2017, 89 patients (3.8%) had active cancer, whereas 2247 did not. Among patients with active cancer, 49 had limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). The prevalent cancers identified before TAVR were colon (21%), prostate (18%), lung (15%), liver (11%) and breast (9%). Although the periprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rates were comparable between the groups, the 3-year survival rate after TAVR was notably lower in patients with active cancer (64.7%) than in those without active cancer (74.7%; p=0.016). Nevertheless, the 3-year survival rate of patients with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2) did not significantly differ from those without cancer (70.6% vs 74.7%, p=0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patients with active cancer exhibited significantly reduced midterm survival rates. However, no distinct disparity existed in those with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). Although TAVR is a viable treatment in patients with AS with active cancer, the type and stage of cancer and prognosis should be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900309/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)合并活动性癌症患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)的临床疗效仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估确诊为主动脉瓣狭窄和活动性癌症患者的经导管主动脉瓣置换术中期疗效:方法:分析日本前瞻性TAVR手术登记处OCEAN-TAVI的数据,比较TAVR时患有和未患有活动性癌症患者的预后和临床结果:在2013年10月至2017年7月期间接受TAVR的2336名患者中,89名患者(3.8%)患有活动性癌症,而2247名患者没有。在患有活动性癌症的患者中,49人患有局限期癌症(1期或2期)。TAVR 术前发现的常见癌症有结肠癌(21%)、前列腺癌(18%)、肺癌(15%)、肝癌(11%)和乳腺癌(9%)。虽然两组患者的围手术期并发症和 30 天死亡率相当,但活动性癌症患者的 TAVR 术后 3 年生存率(64.7%)明显低于非活动性癌症患者(74.7%;P=0.016)。然而,局限期癌症(1期或2期)患者的3年生存率与非癌症患者没有显著差异(70.6% vs 74.7%,P=0.50):结论:活动性癌症患者的中期生存率明显降低。结论:活动性癌症患者的中期生存率明显降低,但局限期癌症(1期或2期)患者的中期生存率并无明显差异。尽管TAVR是一种可行的治疗方法,但在决策过程中应仔细权衡癌症的类型和分期以及预后。
Midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with active cancer.
Objectives: The clinical outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant active cancer remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess the midterm outcomes of TAVR in patients diagnosed with AS and active cancer.
Methods: Data from the OCEAN-TAVI, a prospective Japanese registry of TAVR procedures, was analysed to compare prognoses and clinical outcomes in patients with and without active cancer at the time of TAVR.
Results: Of the 2336 patients who underwent TAVR from October 2013 to July 2017, 89 patients (3.8%) had active cancer, whereas 2247 did not. Among patients with active cancer, 49 had limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). The prevalent cancers identified before TAVR were colon (21%), prostate (18%), lung (15%), liver (11%) and breast (9%). Although the periprocedural complications and 30-day mortality rates were comparable between the groups, the 3-year survival rate after TAVR was notably lower in patients with active cancer (64.7%) than in those without active cancer (74.7%; p=0.016). Nevertheless, the 3-year survival rate of patients with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2) did not significantly differ from those without cancer (70.6% vs 74.7%, p=0.50).
Conclusions: The patients with active cancer exhibited significantly reduced midterm survival rates. However, no distinct disparity existed in those with limited-stage cancer (stage 1 or 2). Although TAVR is a viable treatment in patients with AS with active cancer, the type and stage of cancer and prognosis should be carefully weighed in the decision-making process.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.