性别与免疫检查点抑制剂疗效之间的关系:系统综述与荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.2217/imt-2023-0307
Jianxiong Lai, Xiaohong Kuang, Yi Fu, Jian Li
{"title":"性别与免疫检查点抑制剂疗效之间的关系:系统综述与荟萃分析。","authors":"Jianxiong Lai, Xiaohong Kuang, Yi Fu, Jian Li","doi":"10.2217/imt-2023-0307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To explore the association between sex and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). <b>Materials & methods:</b> We assessed the difference in survival outcomes from ICIs between sexes using an interaction test. <b>Results:</b> 108 studies representing 70,243 patients were included. In the first-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.04). In the subsequent-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). When ICIs were given as perioperative therapy or as systemic therapy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, both men and women obtained equal survival benefits. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both sex, line of therapy, cancer (sub)type and PD-L1 status should be taken into account in the assessment of risk versus benefit when deciding to offer ICIs to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13328,"journal":{"name":"Immunotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"481-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between sex and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Jianxiong Lai, Xiaohong Kuang, Yi Fu, Jian Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2217/imt-2023-0307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To explore the association between sex and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). <b>Materials & methods:</b> We assessed the difference in survival outcomes from ICIs between sexes using an interaction test. <b>Results:</b> 108 studies representing 70,243 patients were included. In the first-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.04). In the subsequent-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). When ICIs were given as perioperative therapy or as systemic therapy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, both men and women obtained equal survival benefits. <b>Conclusion:</b> Both sex, line of therapy, cancer (sub)type and PD-L1 status should be taken into account in the assessment of risk versus benefit when deciding to offer ICIs to patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"481-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2023-0307\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2023-0307","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨性别与免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)之间的关系。材料与方法我们使用交互检验法评估了不同性别在使用 ICIs 后的生存结果差异。结果共纳入 108 项研究,代表 70,243 名患者。在一线治疗中,汇总的交互作用 HR 为 0.97(95% CI:0.91-1.04)。在随后的一线治疗中,汇总的交互 HR 为 0.85(95% CI:0.77-0.95)。在PD-L1表达阳性的患者中,如果将ICIs作为围手术期治疗或全身治疗,男性和女性都能获得相同的生存获益。结论在决定为患者提供 ICIs 时,在评估风险与获益时应考虑性别、治疗方案、癌症(亚)类型和 PD-L1 状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between sex and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: To explore the association between sex and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Materials & methods: We assessed the difference in survival outcomes from ICIs between sexes using an interaction test. Results: 108 studies representing 70,243 patients were included. In the first-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.04). In the subsequent-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). When ICIs were given as perioperative therapy or as systemic therapy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, both men and women obtained equal survival benefits. Conclusion: Both sex, line of therapy, cancer (sub)type and PD-L1 status should be taken into account in the assessment of risk versus benefit when deciding to offer ICIs to patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunotherapy
Immunotherapy 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Many aspects of the immune system and mechanisms of immunomodulatory therapies remain to be elucidated in order to exploit fully the emerging opportunities. Those involved in the research and clinical applications of immunotherapy are challenged by the huge and intricate volumes of knowledge arising from this fast-evolving field. The journal Immunotherapy offers the scientific community an interdisciplinary forum, providing them with information on the most recent advances of various aspects of immunotherapies, in a concise format to aid navigation of this complex field. Immunotherapy delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this vitally important area of research. Unsolicited article proposals are welcomed and authors are required to comply fully with the journal''s Disclosure & Conflict of Interest Policy as well as major publishing guidelines, including ICMJE and GPP3.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信