在重症儿童中使用选择性肠道净化:PICnIC 试验性 RCT 和混合方法研究。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alanna Brown, Paloma Ferrando-Vivas, Mariana Popa, Gema Milla de la Fuente, John Pappachan, Brian H Cuthbertson, Laura Drikite, Richard Feltbower, Theodore Gouliouris, Isobel Sale, Robert Shulman, Lyvonne N Tume, John Myburgh, Kerry Woolfall, David A Harrison, Paul R Mouncey, Kathryn Rowan, Nazima Pathan
{"title":"在重症儿童中使用选择性肠道净化:PICnIC 试验性 RCT 和混合方法研究。","authors":"Alanna Brown, Paloma Ferrando-Vivas, Mariana Popa, Gema Milla de la Fuente, John Pappachan, Brian H Cuthbertson, Laura Drikite, Richard Feltbower, Theodore Gouliouris, Isobel Sale, Robert Shulman, Lyvonne N Tume, John Myburgh, Kerry Woolfall, David A Harrison, Paul R Mouncey, Kathryn Rowan, Nazima Pathan","doi":"10.3310/HDKV1008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. In adults, data suggest the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract may reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract has not been evaluated in the paediatric intensive care unit population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the feasibility of conducting a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial in critically ill children comparing selective decontamination of the digestive tract with standard infection control.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Parallel-group pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial with an integrated mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six paediatric intensive care units in England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age, up to 16 years) requiring mechanical ventilation expected to last for at least 48 hours were eligible for the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. During the ecology periods, all children admitted to the paediatric intensive care units were eligible. Parents/legal guardians of recruited patients and healthcare professionals working in paediatric intensive care units were eligible for inclusion in the mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The interventions in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial included administration of selective decontamination of the digestive tract as oro-pharyngeal paste and as a suspension given by enteric tube during the period of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The decision as to whether a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial is feasible is based on multiple outcomes, including (but not limited to): (1) willingness and ability to recruit eligible patients; (2) adherence to the selective decontamination of the digestive tract intervention; (3) acceptability of the definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial; (4) estimation of recruitment rate; and (5) understanding of potential clinical and ecological outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 368 children (85% of all those who were eligible) were enrolled in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial across six paediatric intensive care units: 207 in the baseline phase (Period One) and 161 in the intervention period (Period Two). In sites delivering selective decontamination of the digestive tract, the majority (98%) of children received at least one dose of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, and of these, 68% commenced within the first 6 hours. Consent for the collection of additional swabs was low (44%), though data completeness for potential outcomes, including microbiology data from routine clinical swab testing, was excellent. Recruited children were representative of the wider paediatric intensive care unit population. Overall, 3.6 children/site/week were recruited compared with the potential recruitment rate for a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial of 3 children/site/week, based on data from all UK paediatric intensive care units. The proposed trial, including consent and selective decontamination of the digestive tract, was acceptable to parents and staff with adaptations, including training to improve consent and communication, and adaptations to the administration protocol for the paste and ecology monitoring. Clinical outcomes that were considered important included duration of organ failure and hospital stay, healthcare-acquired infections and survival.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The delivery of the pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to slow set-up of sites, and a lack of face-to face training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICnIC's findings indicate that a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial in selective decontamination of the digestive tract in paediatric intensive care units is feasible with the inclusion modifications, which would need to be included in a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial to ensure that the efficiency of trial processes is maximised.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>A definitive trial that incorporates the protocol adaptations and outcomes arising from this study is feasible and should be conducted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN40310490.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/152/01) and is published in full in <i>Health Technology Assessment</i>; Vol. 28, No. 8. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12898,"journal":{"name":"Health technology assessment","volume":"28 8","pages":"1-84"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: PICnIC a pilot RCT and mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Alanna Brown, Paloma Ferrando-Vivas, Mariana Popa, Gema Milla de la Fuente, John Pappachan, Brian H Cuthbertson, Laura Drikite, Richard Feltbower, Theodore Gouliouris, Isobel Sale, Robert Shulman, Lyvonne N Tume, John Myburgh, Kerry Woolfall, David A Harrison, Paul R Mouncey, Kathryn Rowan, Nazima Pathan\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/HDKV1008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. In adults, data suggest the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract may reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract has not been evaluated in the paediatric intensive care unit population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the feasibility of conducting a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial in critically ill children comparing selective decontamination of the digestive tract with standard infection control.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Parallel-group pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial with an integrated mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Six paediatric intensive care units in England.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Children (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age, up to 16 years) requiring mechanical ventilation expected to last for at least 48 hours were eligible for the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. During the ecology periods, all children admitted to the paediatric intensive care units were eligible. Parents/legal guardians of recruited patients and healthcare professionals working in paediatric intensive care units were eligible for inclusion in the mixed-methods study.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The interventions in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial included administration of selective decontamination of the digestive tract as oro-pharyngeal paste and as a suspension given by enteric tube during the period of mechanical ventilation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The decision as to whether a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial is feasible is based on multiple outcomes, including (but not limited to): (1) willingness and ability to recruit eligible patients; (2) adherence to the selective decontamination of the digestive tract intervention; (3) acceptability of the definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial; (4) estimation of recruitment rate; and (5) understanding of potential clinical and ecological outcome measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 368 children (85% of all those who were eligible) were enrolled in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial across six paediatric intensive care units: 207 in the baseline phase (Period One) and 161 in the intervention period (Period Two). In sites delivering selective decontamination of the digestive tract, the majority (98%) of children received at least one dose of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, and of these, 68% commenced within the first 6 hours. Consent for the collection of additional swabs was low (44%), though data completeness for potential outcomes, including microbiology data from routine clinical swab testing, was excellent. Recruited children were representative of the wider paediatric intensive care unit population. Overall, 3.6 children/site/week were recruited compared with the potential recruitment rate for a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial of 3 children/site/week, based on data from all UK paediatric intensive care units. The proposed trial, including consent and selective decontamination of the digestive tract, was acceptable to parents and staff with adaptations, including training to improve consent and communication, and adaptations to the administration protocol for the paste and ecology monitoring. Clinical outcomes that were considered important included duration of organ failure and hospital stay, healthcare-acquired infections and survival.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The delivery of the pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to slow set-up of sites, and a lack of face-to face training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PICnIC's findings indicate that a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial in selective decontamination of the digestive tract in paediatric intensive care units is feasible with the inclusion modifications, which would need to be included in a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial to ensure that the efficiency of trial processes is maximised.</p><p><strong>Future work: </strong>A definitive trial that incorporates the protocol adaptations and outcomes arising from this study is feasible and should be conducted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered as ISRCTN40310490.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/152/01) and is published in full in <i>Health Technology Assessment</i>; Vol. 28, No. 8. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health technology assessment\",\"volume\":\"28 8\",\"pages\":\"1-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11017160/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health technology assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/HDKV1008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health technology assessment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/HDKV1008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:医疗相关感染是重症儿童发病和死亡的主要原因。在成人中,有数据表明对消化道进行选择性净化可降低医源性感染的发病率。在儿科重症监护室人群中,尚未对消化道选择性净化进行评估:目的:确定在重症儿童中开展多中心、分组随机对照试验的可行性,比较消化道选择性净化与标准感染控制:设计:平行组试验性分组随机对照试验与综合混合方法研究:地点:英格兰六家儿科重症监护室:需要进行至少 48 小时机械通气的儿童(胎龄大于 37 周,16 岁以下)均有资格参与 PICnIC 试验性分组随机对照试验。在生态学期间,所有入住儿科重症监护病房的儿童均符合条件。被招募患者的家长/法定监护人以及在儿科重症监护室工作的医护人员均有资格参与混合方法研究:干预措施:PICnIC 试验性分组随机对照试验的干预措施包括在机械通气期间通过口咽糊剂和肠管悬浮液对消化道进行选择性净化:决定分组随机对照试验是否可行的依据是多种结果,包括(但不限于):(1) 是否有意愿和能力招募患者?(1) 招募合格患者的意愿和能力;(2) 对消化道选择性净化干预措施的坚持程度;(3) 最终分组随机对照试验的可接受性;(4) 招募率的估计;(5) 对潜在临床和生态学结果测量的理解:共有 368 名儿童(占所有符合条件儿童的 85%)在六家儿科重症监护病房参加了 PICnIC 试验性分组随机对照试验:207 名儿童参加了基线阶段(第一阶段),161 名儿童参加了干预阶段(第二阶段)。在提供消化道选择性净化的医疗点中,大多数(98%)患儿至少接受了一次消化道选择性净化,其中 68% 的患儿在最初 6 小时内开始接受净化。同意采集额外拭子的比例较低(44%),但潜在结果数据(包括常规临床拭子检测的微生物学数据)的完整性非常好。招募的儿童在更广泛的儿科重症监护病房人群中具有代表性。总体而言,该试验共招募了 3.6 名患儿/部位/周,而根据英国所有儿科重症监护病房的数据,确定性群组随机对照试验的潜在招募率为 3 名患儿/部位/周。拟议的试验包括征得同意和有选择性地净化消化道,家长和工作人员可以接受,但需要进行调整,包括进行培训以改善同意和沟通,以及调整糊剂和生态监测的给药方案。重要的临床结果包括器官衰竭和住院时间、医源性感染和存活率:局限性:分组随机对照试验的实施受到了 COVID-19 大流行的干扰,导致试验点的建立缓慢,并且缺乏面对面的培训:PICnIC的研究结果表明,在儿科重症监护病房进行选择性消化道净化的最终分组随机对照试验是可行的:未来工作:结合本研究的方案调整和结果进行最终试验是可行的,应予以开展:试验注册:本试验的注册号为 ISRCTN40310490:该奖项由美国国家健康与护理研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估项目资助(NIHR奖项编号:16/152/01),全文发表于《健康技术评估》(Health Technology Assessment)第28卷第8期。如需了解更多奖项信息,请访问 NIHR Funding and Awards 网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of selective gut decontamination in critically ill children: PICnIC a pilot RCT and mixed-methods study.

Background: Healthcare-associated infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill children. In adults, data suggest the use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract may reduce the incidence of healthcare-associated infections. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract has not been evaluated in the paediatric intensive care unit population.

Objectives: To determine the feasibility of conducting a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial in critically ill children comparing selective decontamination of the digestive tract with standard infection control.

Design: Parallel-group pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial with an integrated mixed-methods study.

Setting: Six paediatric intensive care units in England.

Participants: Children (> 37 weeks corrected gestational age, up to 16 years) requiring mechanical ventilation expected to last for at least 48 hours were eligible for the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial. During the ecology periods, all children admitted to the paediatric intensive care units were eligible. Parents/legal guardians of recruited patients and healthcare professionals working in paediatric intensive care units were eligible for inclusion in the mixed-methods study.

Interventions: The interventions in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial included administration of selective decontamination of the digestive tract as oro-pharyngeal paste and as a suspension given by enteric tube during the period of mechanical ventilation.

Main outcome measures: The decision as to whether a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial is feasible is based on multiple outcomes, including (but not limited to): (1) willingness and ability to recruit eligible patients; (2) adherence to the selective decontamination of the digestive tract intervention; (3) acceptability of the definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial; (4) estimation of recruitment rate; and (5) understanding of potential clinical and ecological outcome measures.

Results: A total of 368 children (85% of all those who were eligible) were enrolled in the PICnIC pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial across six paediatric intensive care units: 207 in the baseline phase (Period One) and 161 in the intervention period (Period Two). In sites delivering selective decontamination of the digestive tract, the majority (98%) of children received at least one dose of selective decontamination of the digestive tract, and of these, 68% commenced within the first 6 hours. Consent for the collection of additional swabs was low (44%), though data completeness for potential outcomes, including microbiology data from routine clinical swab testing, was excellent. Recruited children were representative of the wider paediatric intensive care unit population. Overall, 3.6 children/site/week were recruited compared with the potential recruitment rate for a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial of 3 children/site/week, based on data from all UK paediatric intensive care units. The proposed trial, including consent and selective decontamination of the digestive tract, was acceptable to parents and staff with adaptations, including training to improve consent and communication, and adaptations to the administration protocol for the paste and ecology monitoring. Clinical outcomes that were considered important included duration of organ failure and hospital stay, healthcare-acquired infections and survival.

Limitations: The delivery of the pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic, which led to slow set-up of sites, and a lack of face-to face training.

Conclusions: PICnIC's findings indicate that a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial in selective decontamination of the digestive tract in paediatric intensive care units is feasible with the inclusion modifications, which would need to be included in a definitive cluster-randomised controlled trial to ensure that the efficiency of trial processes is maximised.

Future work: A definitive trial that incorporates the protocol adaptations and outcomes arising from this study is feasible and should be conducted.

Trial registration: This trial is registered as ISRCTN40310490.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/152/01) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 8. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health technology assessment
Health technology assessment 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Technology Assessment (HTA) publishes research information on the effectiveness, costs and broader impact of health technologies for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信