LIBET-Q基于过程的组成部分的验证:案例概念化的创新工具

Alessia Offredi, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Maria Ruggiero, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni Mansueto, Simona Scaini, Sara Palmieri, Sandra Sassaroli
{"title":"LIBET-Q基于过程的组成部分的验证:案例概念化的创新工具","authors":"Alessia Offredi, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Maria Ruggiero, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni Mansueto, Simona Scaini, Sara Palmieri, Sandra Sassaroli","doi":"10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Case conceptualization is a widely used tool to describe and organize patient information and plan interventions in psychotherapy. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation, and treatment (LIBET) is a new method for case conceptualization that validates the diathesis-stress model and incorporates elements from the most important theories in the CBT field. LIBET also includes process-based components as maintaining factors of psychological distress, and it is not anchored to a specific kind of psychotherapeutic approach. The LIBET-Questionnaire (LIBET-Q) is a structured interview which helps clinicians achieve a LIBET case conceptualization, co-constructed with patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the process-based section of the LIBET-Q by analyzing its factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and clinical relevance. A sample of 396 outpatients was recruited to validate the LIBET-Q, which was administered along with interviews and self-report questionnaires to investigate the presence of diagnoses, anxiety, and depression levels and global functioning and wellbeing. Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a four-factor structure, with adequate consistency and good convergent validity. Process-based elements investigated with the LIBET-Q resulted in identifying different clinical populations. With satisfactory psychometric properties, the LIBET-Q turned out to be a suitable support for case conceptualization and treatment formulation. The independence of the LIBET method from a specific intervention can improve its sharing between clinicians by offering a common frame in which the rationale of every specific technique can be explained.</p>","PeriodicalId":501324,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization\",\"authors\":\"Alessia Offredi, Annalisa Oppo, Giovanni Maria Ruggiero, Gabriele Caselli, Giovanni Mansueto, Simona Scaini, Sara Palmieri, Sandra Sassaroli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Case conceptualization is a widely used tool to describe and organize patient information and plan interventions in psychotherapy. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation, and treatment (LIBET) is a new method for case conceptualization that validates the diathesis-stress model and incorporates elements from the most important theories in the CBT field. LIBET also includes process-based components as maintaining factors of psychological distress, and it is not anchored to a specific kind of psychotherapeutic approach. The LIBET-Questionnaire (LIBET-Q) is a structured interview which helps clinicians achieve a LIBET case conceptualization, co-constructed with patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the process-based section of the LIBET-Q by analyzing its factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and clinical relevance. A sample of 396 outpatients was recruited to validate the LIBET-Q, which was administered along with interviews and self-report questionnaires to investigate the presence of diagnoses, anxiety, and depression levels and global functioning and wellbeing. Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a four-factor structure, with adequate consistency and good convergent validity. Process-based elements investigated with the LIBET-Q resulted in identifying different clinical populations. With satisfactory psychometric properties, the LIBET-Q turned out to be a suitable support for case conceptualization and treatment formulation. The independence of the LIBET method from a specific intervention can improve its sharing between clinicians by offering a common frame in which the rationale of every specific technique can be explained.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-024-00542-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病例概念化是一种广泛使用的工具,用于描述和组织病人信息,并规划心理治疗中的干预措施。生活主题和半适应性计划:生活主题和半适应性计划:偏差信念、诱导和治疗的意义(LIBET)是一种新的病例概念化方法,它验证了病因-压力模型,并融入了 CBT 领域最重要的理论元素。LIBET 还将基于过程的因素作为心理困扰的维持因素,并且不拘泥于某种特定的心理治疗方法。LIBET-问卷(LIBET-Q)是一种结构化访谈,可帮助临床医生与患者共同构建LIBET病例概念。本研究旨在通过分析 LIBET-Q 的因子结构、内部一致性、收敛效度和临床相关性,验证其基于过程的部分。为验证LIBET-Q,研究人员招募了396名门诊患者样本,并通过访谈和自我报告问卷调查患者的诊断、焦虑和抑郁程度以及整体功能和健康状况。探索性因素分析和确认性因素分析的结果显示,LIBET-Q具有四因素结构,具有充分的一致性和良好的聚合效度。使用 LIBET-Q 调查基于过程的要素,可识别不同的临床人群。LIBET-Q具有令人满意的心理测量特性,因此适合用于病例概念化和治疗方案的制定。LIBET方法独立于特定的干预措施,可以为临床医生提供一个共同的框架,解释每种特定技术的原理,从而提高临床医生之间的共享性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization

Validation of Process-Based Components of the LIBET-Q: An Innovative Instrument for Case Conceptualization

Case conceptualization is a widely used tool to describe and organize patient information and plan interventions in psychotherapy. Life themes and semi-adaptive plans: Implications of biased beliefs, elicitation, and treatment (LIBET) is a new method for case conceptualization that validates the diathesis-stress model and incorporates elements from the most important theories in the CBT field. LIBET also includes process-based components as maintaining factors of psychological distress, and it is not anchored to a specific kind of psychotherapeutic approach. The LIBET-Questionnaire (LIBET-Q) is a structured interview which helps clinicians achieve a LIBET case conceptualization, co-constructed with patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the process-based section of the LIBET-Q by analyzing its factorial structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and clinical relevance. A sample of 396 outpatients was recruited to validate the LIBET-Q, which was administered along with interviews and self-report questionnaires to investigate the presence of diagnoses, anxiety, and depression levels and global functioning and wellbeing. Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses showed a four-factor structure, with adequate consistency and good convergent validity. Process-based elements investigated with the LIBET-Q resulted in identifying different clinical populations. With satisfactory psychometric properties, the LIBET-Q turned out to be a suitable support for case conceptualization and treatment formulation. The independence of the LIBET method from a specific intervention can improve its sharing between clinicians by offering a common frame in which the rationale of every specific technique can be explained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信