建立无创鉴定腰椎间盘疼痛的黄金标准:磁共振波谱与低压刺激椎间盘造影的前瞻性比较。

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
Matthew G Gornet, James Peacock, Timothy Ryken, Francine W Schranck, Robert K Eastlack, Jeffrey C Lotz
{"title":"建立无创鉴定腰椎间盘疼痛的黄金标准:磁共振波谱与低压刺激椎间盘造影的前瞻性比较。","authors":"Matthew G Gornet, James Peacock, Timothy Ryken, Francine W Schranck, Robert K Eastlack, Jeffrey C Lotz","doi":"10.14444/8574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Verifying lumbar disc pain can present a clinical challenge. Low-pressure provocative discography (PD) has served as the gold standard, although it is invasive and often a challenge to interpret. We reported that magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) biomarkers accurately predict PD results in lumbar discs and improved outcomes for patients with surgery at positive MRS levels versus nonsurgery. To further substantiate MRS for diagnosing painful discs, we report a prospective comparison of 2 MRS-derived measures: NOCISCORE (pain) and SI-SCORE (degeneration severity).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lumbar MRS and software-based postprocessing (NOCISCAN-LS, Aclarion Inc.) was performed in 44 discs in 14 patients (prospective cohort [PC]). PC data were compared to prior data used to establish the NOCISCORE (training cohort [TC]). The NOCISCORE was converted to an ordinal value (high/intermediate/low; NOCI+/mild/-) and compared against painful (P) versus nonpainful (NP) control diagnosis (PD) for 19 discs where PD was performed in the PC (12 NP; 7 P). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The SI-SCORE was compared against MRI Pfirrmann Grades for 465 discs in 126 patients (PC plus TC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the PC, MRS (NOCI+/-) compared to PD (P/NP) with an accuracy of 87% and sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive values of MRS were 100%. NOCISCOREs were significantly higher for PD+ versus PD- discs for PC and TC (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and the NOCISCORE distributions for PD+/- group were not statistically different between the PC and TC (<i>P</i> > 0.05). SI-SCORES differed between Pfirrmann Grades 1 and 2 (less degenerated) versus Grades 3 and 4 (more degenerated; <i>P</i> < 0.05), with a progressively decreasing trend with Pfirrmann Grades 1-5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These current data provide prospective confirmation of the predictive value of disc MRS for distinguishing painful discs and for assessing the disc structural integrity.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>NOCISCAN is an adoptable, noninvasive, and objectively quantitative test to improve management of low back pain patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 2: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Establishing a Gold Standard for Noninvasive Identification of Painful Lumbar Discs: Prospective Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy vs Low-Pressure Provocation Discography.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew G Gornet, James Peacock, Timothy Ryken, Francine W Schranck, Robert K Eastlack, Jeffrey C Lotz\",\"doi\":\"10.14444/8574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Verifying lumbar disc pain can present a clinical challenge. Low-pressure provocative discography (PD) has served as the gold standard, although it is invasive and often a challenge to interpret. We reported that magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) biomarkers accurately predict PD results in lumbar discs and improved outcomes for patients with surgery at positive MRS levels versus nonsurgery. To further substantiate MRS for diagnosing painful discs, we report a prospective comparison of 2 MRS-derived measures: NOCISCORE (pain) and SI-SCORE (degeneration severity).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lumbar MRS and software-based postprocessing (NOCISCAN-LS, Aclarion Inc.) was performed in 44 discs in 14 patients (prospective cohort [PC]). PC data were compared to prior data used to establish the NOCISCORE (training cohort [TC]). The NOCISCORE was converted to an ordinal value (high/intermediate/low; NOCI+/mild/-) and compared against painful (P) versus nonpainful (NP) control diagnosis (PD) for 19 discs where PD was performed in the PC (12 NP; 7 P). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The SI-SCORE was compared against MRI Pfirrmann Grades for 465 discs in 126 patients (PC plus TC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the PC, MRS (NOCI+/-) compared to PD (P/NP) with an accuracy of 87% and sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive values of MRS were 100%. NOCISCOREs were significantly higher for PD+ versus PD- discs for PC and TC (<i>P</i> < 0.05), and the NOCISCORE distributions for PD+/- group were not statistically different between the PC and TC (<i>P</i> > 0.05). SI-SCORES differed between Pfirrmann Grades 1 and 2 (less degenerated) versus Grades 3 and 4 (more degenerated; <i>P</i> < 0.05), with a progressively decreasing trend with Pfirrmann Grades 1-5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These current data provide prospective confirmation of the predictive value of disc MRS for distinguishing painful discs and for assessing the disc structural integrity.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>NOCISCAN is an adoptable, noninvasive, and objectively quantitative test to improve management of low back pain patients.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 2: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14444/8574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:验证腰椎间盘疼痛是一项临床挑战。低压诱导性椎间盘造影术(PD)一直是金标准,但它具有创伤性,而且往往难以解释。我们报告称,磁共振波谱(MRS)生物标志物能准确预测腰椎间盘的 PD 结果,并能改善 MRS 阳性水平手术患者的预后。为了进一步证实 MRS 在诊断疼痛椎间盘方面的作用,我们报告了一项对 2 种 MRS 衍生指标的前瞻性比较:方法:对 14 名患者(前瞻性队列 [PC])的 44 个椎间盘进行了腰椎 MRS 和基于软件的后处理(NOCISCAN-LS,Aclarion 公司)。将 PC 数据与之前用于建立 NOCISCORE 的数据(训练队列 [TC])进行比较。将 NOCISCORE 转换为序数值(高/中/低;NOCI+/轻度/-),并与在 PC 中进行了 PD 的 19 个椎间盘(12 个 NP;7 个 P)的疼痛 (P) 和非疼痛 (NP) 对照诊断 (PD) 进行比较。计算了敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。将 SI-SCORE 与核磁共振成像 Pfirrmann 分级进行了比较,对 126 名患者(PC 加 TC)的 465 个椎间盘进行了比较:就 PC 而言,MRS(NOCI+/-)与 PD(P/NP)相比,准确率为 87%,灵敏度和特异性均为 100%。MRS 的阳性和阴性预测值均为 100%。PC 和 TC 中,PD+ 盘的 NOCISCORE 明显高于 PD- 盘(P < 0.05),而 PC 和 TC 中,PD+/- 组的 NOCISCORE 分布无统计学差异(P > 0.05)。SI-SCORES在Pfirrmann 1级和2级(退变较少)与3级和4级(退变较多;P<0.05)之间存在差异,Pfirrmann 1-5级呈逐渐下降趋势:目前的这些数据证实了椎间盘 MRS 在区分疼痛椎间盘和评估椎间盘结构完整性方面的预测价值:NOCISCAN是一种可采用的、无创的客观定量检测方法,可改善腰背痛患者的管理:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Establishing a Gold Standard for Noninvasive Identification of Painful Lumbar Discs: Prospective Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy vs Low-Pressure Provocation Discography.

Purpose: Verifying lumbar disc pain can present a clinical challenge. Low-pressure provocative discography (PD) has served as the gold standard, although it is invasive and often a challenge to interpret. We reported that magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) biomarkers accurately predict PD results in lumbar discs and improved outcomes for patients with surgery at positive MRS levels versus nonsurgery. To further substantiate MRS for diagnosing painful discs, we report a prospective comparison of 2 MRS-derived measures: NOCISCORE (pain) and SI-SCORE (degeneration severity).

Methods: Lumbar MRS and software-based postprocessing (NOCISCAN-LS, Aclarion Inc.) was performed in 44 discs in 14 patients (prospective cohort [PC]). PC data were compared to prior data used to establish the NOCISCORE (training cohort [TC]). The NOCISCORE was converted to an ordinal value (high/intermediate/low; NOCI+/mild/-) and compared against painful (P) versus nonpainful (NP) control diagnosis (PD) for 19 discs where PD was performed in the PC (12 NP; 7 P). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. The SI-SCORE was compared against MRI Pfirrmann Grades for 465 discs in 126 patients (PC plus TC).

Results: For the PC, MRS (NOCI+/-) compared to PD (P/NP) with an accuracy of 87% and sensitivity and specificity of 100%. The positive and negative predictive values of MRS were 100%. NOCISCOREs were significantly higher for PD+ versus PD- discs for PC and TC (P < 0.05), and the NOCISCORE distributions for PD+/- group were not statistically different between the PC and TC (P > 0.05). SI-SCORES differed between Pfirrmann Grades 1 and 2 (less degenerated) versus Grades 3 and 4 (more degenerated; P < 0.05), with a progressively decreasing trend with Pfirrmann Grades 1-5.

Conclusion: These current data provide prospective confirmation of the predictive value of disc MRS for distinguishing painful discs and for assessing the disc structural integrity.

Clinical relevance: NOCISCAN is an adoptable, noninvasive, and objectively quantitative test to improve management of low back pain patients.

Level of evidence: 2:

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信