大流行期间远程医疗的可及性和糖尿病护理模式的变化:来自美国东南部一个大型综合医疗系统的证据。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Sofia A Oviedo, Bennett McDonald, Jennifer C Gander, Mohammed K Ali, Jessica L Harding
{"title":"大流行期间远程医疗的可及性和糖尿病护理模式的变化:来自美国东南部一个大型综合医疗系统的证据。","authors":"Sofia A Oviedo, Bennett McDonald, Jennifer C Gander, Mohammed K Ali, Jessica L Harding","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To examine the role of telehealth in diabetes care and management during versus pre-COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included adults (≥18 years) with prevalent diabetes as of January 1, 2018, and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Georgia through December 31, 2021 (n=22,854). We defined pre (2018-2019) and during COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed the within-subject change in adherence to seven annual routine care processes (blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), cholesterol, creatinine, urine-albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), eye and foot examinations) pre versus during COVID-19 among telehealth users (ie, more than one telehealth visit per year per period) and non-telehealth users. Linear GEE compared mean laboratory measurements pre versus during COVID-19 by telehealth use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of telehealth users increased from 38.7% (2018-2019) to 91.5% (2020-2021). During (vs pre) the pandemic, adherence to all care processes declined in telehealth (range: 1.6% for foot examinations to 12.4% for BP) and non-telehealth users (range: 1.9% for foot examinations to 40.7% for BP). In telehealth users, average HbA1c (mean difference: 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.6%), systolic BP (1.62 mm Hg (1.44 to 1.81)), and creatinine (0.03 mg/dL (0.02 to 0.04)), worsened during (vs pre) COVID-19, while low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol improved (-9.08 mg/dL (-9.77 to -8.39)). For UACR, odds of elevated risk of kidney disease increased by 48% (OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62)). Patterns were similar in non-telehealth users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth use increased during the pandemic and alleviated some of the observed declines in routine diabetes care and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900384/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to telehealth and changes in diabetes care patterns during the pandemic: evidence from a large integrated health system in the Southeast USA.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia A Oviedo, Bennett McDonald, Jennifer C Gander, Mohammed K Ali, Jessica L Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To examine the role of telehealth in diabetes care and management during versus pre-COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We included adults (≥18 years) with prevalent diabetes as of January 1, 2018, and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Georgia through December 31, 2021 (n=22,854). We defined pre (2018-2019) and during COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed the within-subject change in adherence to seven annual routine care processes (blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), cholesterol, creatinine, urine-albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), eye and foot examinations) pre versus during COVID-19 among telehealth users (ie, more than one telehealth visit per year per period) and non-telehealth users. Linear GEE compared mean laboratory measurements pre versus during COVID-19 by telehealth use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of telehealth users increased from 38.7% (2018-2019) to 91.5% (2020-2021). During (vs pre) the pandemic, adherence to all care processes declined in telehealth (range: 1.6% for foot examinations to 12.4% for BP) and non-telehealth users (range: 1.9% for foot examinations to 40.7% for BP). In telehealth users, average HbA1c (mean difference: 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.6%), systolic BP (1.62 mm Hg (1.44 to 1.81)), and creatinine (0.03 mg/dL (0.02 to 0.04)), worsened during (vs pre) COVID-19, while low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol improved (-9.08 mg/dL (-9.77 to -8.39)). For UACR, odds of elevated risk of kidney disease increased by 48% (OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62)). Patterns were similar in non-telehealth users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telehealth use increased during the pandemic and alleviated some of the observed declines in routine diabetes care and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10900384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2023-003882","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言研究设计与方法:我们纳入了截至 2018 年 1 月 1 日患有流行性糖尿病,并在 2021 年 12 月 31 日之前在 Kaiser Permanente Georgia 连续注册的成人(≥18 岁)(n=22854)。我们定义了 COVID-19 之前(2018-2019 年)和期间(2020-2021 年)。逻辑广义估计方程 (GEE) 评估了远程医疗用户(即在每个时期每年进行一次以上远程医疗就诊)和非远程医疗用户在 COVID-19 前与 COVID-19 期间在遵守七项年度常规护理流程(血压 (BP)、血红蛋白 A1C (HbA1c)、胆固醇、肌酐、尿-白蛋白-肌酐比值 (UACR)、眼部和足部检查)方面的受试者内变化。线性 GEE 比较了 COVID-19 前和 COVID-19 期间按远程保健使用情况分列的平均实验室测量结果:远程保健用户的比例从 38.7%(2018-2019 年)增至 91.5%(2020-2021 年)。大流行期间(与大流行前相比),远程医疗用户(范围:足部检查为 1.6%,血压为 12.4%)和非远程医疗用户(范围:足部检查为 1.9%,血压为 40.7%)对所有护理流程的依从性均有所下降。在远程保健用户中,平均 HbA1c(平均差异为 0.4% (95% C)在 COVID-19 期间(与 COVID-19 之前相比),平均 HbA1c(平均差异:0.4%(95% CI 0.2% 至 0.6%))、收缩压(1.62 毫米汞柱(1.44 至 1.81))和肌酐(0.03 毫克/分升(0.02 至 0.04))有所恶化,而低密度脂蛋白 (LDL) 胆固醇有所改善(-9.08 毫克/分升(-9.77 至 -8.39))。就 UACR 而言,肾病风险升高的几率增加了 48%(OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62))。非远程保健用户的情况与此类似:结论:大流行期间,远程医疗的使用有所增加,缓解了常规糖尿病护理和管理中观察到的一些下降趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to telehealth and changes in diabetes care patterns during the pandemic: evidence from a large integrated health system in the Southeast USA.

Introduction: To examine the role of telehealth in diabetes care and management during versus pre-COVID-19 pandemic.

Research design and methods: We included adults (≥18 years) with prevalent diabetes as of January 1, 2018, and continuously enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Georgia through December 31, 2021 (n=22,854). We defined pre (2018-2019) and during COVID-19 (2020-2021) periods. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEEs) assessed the within-subject change in adherence to seven annual routine care processes (blood pressure (BP), hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), cholesterol, creatinine, urine-albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR), eye and foot examinations) pre versus during COVID-19 among telehealth users (ie, more than one telehealth visit per year per period) and non-telehealth users. Linear GEE compared mean laboratory measurements pre versus during COVID-19 by telehealth use.

Results: The proportion of telehealth users increased from 38.7% (2018-2019) to 91.5% (2020-2021). During (vs pre) the pandemic, adherence to all care processes declined in telehealth (range: 1.6% for foot examinations to 12.4% for BP) and non-telehealth users (range: 1.9% for foot examinations to 40.7% for BP). In telehealth users, average HbA1c (mean difference: 0.4% (95% CI 0.2% to 0.6%), systolic BP (1.62 mm Hg (1.44 to 1.81)), and creatinine (0.03 mg/dL (0.02 to 0.04)), worsened during (vs pre) COVID-19, while low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol improved (-9.08 mg/dL (-9.77 to -8.39)). For UACR, odds of elevated risk of kidney disease increased by 48% (OR 1.48 (1.36-1.62)). Patterns were similar in non-telehealth users.

Conclusions: Telehealth use increased during the pandemic and alleviated some of the observed declines in routine diabetes care and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信