Yawen Tang, Jianlin Xu, Mengmeng Xu, Zhuangrong Huang, Johanna Santos, Qin He, Michael Borys, Anurag Khetan
{"title":"使用不同的强化 N - 1 种子策略生产 mAb 的联产批次性能曲线取决于 CHO 细胞系。","authors":"Yawen Tang, Jianlin Xu, Mengmeng Xu, Zhuangrong Huang, Johanna Santos, Qin He, Michael Borys, Anurag Khetan","doi":"10.1002/btpr.3446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent optimizations of cell culture processes have focused on the final seed scale-up step (<i>N</i> − 1 stage) used to inoculate the production bioreactor (N-stage bioreactor) to enable higher inoculation cell densities (2–20 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/mL), which could shorten the production culture duration and/or increase the volumetric productivity. <i>N</i> − 1 seed process intensification can be achieved by either non-perfusion (enriched-batch or fed-batch) or perfusion culture to reach those higher final <i>N</i> − 1 viable cell densities (VCD). In this study, we evaluated how different <i>N</i> − 1 intensification strategies, specifically enriched-batch (EB) <i>N</i> − 1 versus perfusion <i>N</i> − 1, affect cell growth profiles and monoclonal antibody (mAb) productivity in the final N-stage production bioreactor operated in fed-batch mode. Three representative Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines producing different mAbs were cultured using either EB or perfusion <i>N</i> − 1 seeds and found that the N-stage cell growth and mAb productivities were comparable between EB <i>N</i> − 1 and perfusion <i>N</i> − 1 conditions for two of the cell lines but were very different for the third. In addition, within the two similar cell growth cell lines, differences in cell-specific productivity were observed. This suggests that the impact of the <i>N</i> − 1 intensification process on production was cell-line dependent. This study revealed that the <i>N</i> − 1 intensification strategy and the state of seeds from the different <i>N</i> − 1 conditions may affect the outcome of the N production stage, and thus, the choice of <i>N</i> − 1 intensification strategy could be a new target for future upstream optimization of mAb production.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fed-batch performance profiles for mAb production using different intensified N − 1 seed strategies are CHO cell-line dependent\",\"authors\":\"Yawen Tang, Jianlin Xu, Mengmeng Xu, Zhuangrong Huang, Johanna Santos, Qin He, Michael Borys, Anurag Khetan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/btpr.3446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent optimizations of cell culture processes have focused on the final seed scale-up step (<i>N</i> − 1 stage) used to inoculate the production bioreactor (N-stage bioreactor) to enable higher inoculation cell densities (2–20 × 10<sup>6</sup> cells/mL), which could shorten the production culture duration and/or increase the volumetric productivity. <i>N</i> − 1 seed process intensification can be achieved by either non-perfusion (enriched-batch or fed-batch) or perfusion culture to reach those higher final <i>N</i> − 1 viable cell densities (VCD). In this study, we evaluated how different <i>N</i> − 1 intensification strategies, specifically enriched-batch (EB) <i>N</i> − 1 versus perfusion <i>N</i> − 1, affect cell growth profiles and monoclonal antibody (mAb) productivity in the final N-stage production bioreactor operated in fed-batch mode. Three representative Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines producing different mAbs were cultured using either EB or perfusion <i>N</i> − 1 seeds and found that the N-stage cell growth and mAb productivities were comparable between EB <i>N</i> − 1 and perfusion <i>N</i> − 1 conditions for two of the cell lines but were very different for the third. In addition, within the two similar cell growth cell lines, differences in cell-specific productivity were observed. This suggests that the impact of the <i>N</i> − 1 intensification process on production was cell-line dependent. This study revealed that the <i>N</i> − 1 intensification strategy and the state of seeds from the different <i>N</i> − 1 conditions may affect the outcome of the N production stage, and thus, the choice of <i>N</i> − 1 intensification strategy could be a new target for future upstream optimization of mAb production.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biotechnology Progress\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biotechnology Progress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.3446\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btpr.3446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近对细胞培养工艺的优化主要集中在用于接种生产生物反应器(N 级生物反应器)的最终种子放大步骤(N - 1 级),以实现更高的接种细胞密度(2-20 × 106 cells/mL),从而缩短生产培养时间和/或提高容积生产率。N - 1种子工艺强化可通过非灌流(浓缩批次或喂养批次)或灌流培养来实现,以达到更高的最终 N - 1 活细胞密度(VCD)。在这项研究中,我们评估了不同的 N - 1 强化策略,特别是富集批次 (EB) N - 1 与灌注 N - 1,如何影响以喂养批次模式运行的最终 N 级生产生物反应器中的细胞生长曲线和单克隆抗体 (mAb) 生产率。我们使用 EB 或灌注 N - 1 种子培养了三种具有代表性的生产不同 mAb 的中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞系,发现其中两种细胞系在 EB N - 1 和灌注 N - 1 条件下的 N 阶段细胞生长和 mAb 生产率相当,但第三种细胞系则差别很大。此外,在两种细胞生长相似的细胞系中,还观察到细胞特异性生产率的差异。这表明,氮强化过程对产量的影响取决于细胞系。这项研究揭示了 N - 1 强化策略和不同 N - 1 条件下的种子状态可能会影响 N 生产阶段的结果,因此,N - 1 强化策略的选择可能是未来 mAb 生产上游优化的一个新目标。
Fed-batch performance profiles for mAb production using different intensified N − 1 seed strategies are CHO cell-line dependent
Recent optimizations of cell culture processes have focused on the final seed scale-up step (N − 1 stage) used to inoculate the production bioreactor (N-stage bioreactor) to enable higher inoculation cell densities (2–20 × 106 cells/mL), which could shorten the production culture duration and/or increase the volumetric productivity. N − 1 seed process intensification can be achieved by either non-perfusion (enriched-batch or fed-batch) or perfusion culture to reach those higher final N − 1 viable cell densities (VCD). In this study, we evaluated how different N − 1 intensification strategies, specifically enriched-batch (EB) N − 1 versus perfusion N − 1, affect cell growth profiles and monoclonal antibody (mAb) productivity in the final N-stage production bioreactor operated in fed-batch mode. Three representative Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cell lines producing different mAbs were cultured using either EB or perfusion N − 1 seeds and found that the N-stage cell growth and mAb productivities were comparable between EB N − 1 and perfusion N − 1 conditions for two of the cell lines but were very different for the third. In addition, within the two similar cell growth cell lines, differences in cell-specific productivity were observed. This suggests that the impact of the N − 1 intensification process on production was cell-line dependent. This study revealed that the N − 1 intensification strategy and the state of seeds from the different N − 1 conditions may affect the outcome of the N production stage, and thus, the choice of N − 1 intensification strategy could be a new target for future upstream optimization of mAb production.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries.
Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.