公共卫生中的过敏性休克。

Neuro endocrinology letters Pub Date : 2019-10-08
Patrik Christian Cmorej, Marcel Nesvadba, Alexandra Mamova, Robert Babela, David Peran, Jaroslav Pekara, Alena Kohlova, Petr Bures Bures, Jan Trpisovsky, Otakar Fleishmann, Eva Pfefferova
{"title":"公共卫生中的过敏性休克。","authors":"Patrik Christian Cmorej, Marcel Nesvadba, Alexandra Mamova, Robert Babela, David Peran, Jaroslav Pekara, Alena Kohlova, Petr Bures Bures, Jan Trpisovsky, Otakar Fleishmann, Eva Pfefferova","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The increasing number of patients with anaphylactic reactions is a modern challenge for healthcare professionals in clinical practice and public health professionals. It remains difficult to determine the prevalence or incidence of anaphylaxis in the population due to the long absence of a consensus definition, the fact that analyses are performed on various population groups and the use of different data collection methodologies. In the United States, anaphylaxis mortality ranges from 0.63 to 0.76 cases per million inhabitants, with 58% of these deaths due to drug anaphylaxis. The risk factors for anaphylaxis are ramipril and metoprolol use, which is common in patients with cardiovascular disease. Also, a higher level of gliadin following excess gluten intake is associated with a higher incidence of anaphylaxis. Drugs, food and insect stings have long been known as anaphylaxis inductors. In diagnosis, determination of serum tryptase concentration is used. In patients with normal tryptase concentration, it is appropriate to screen other inflammatory mediators. The authors of this article present new findings on anaphylaxis in the literature and recommended practices of professional societies in the context of public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94154,"journal":{"name":"Neuro endocrinology letters","volume":"40 Suppl1","pages":"3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anaphylaxis in Public Health.\",\"authors\":\"Patrik Christian Cmorej, Marcel Nesvadba, Alexandra Mamova, Robert Babela, David Peran, Jaroslav Pekara, Alena Kohlova, Petr Bures Bures, Jan Trpisovsky, Otakar Fleishmann, Eva Pfefferova\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The increasing number of patients with anaphylactic reactions is a modern challenge for healthcare professionals in clinical practice and public health professionals. It remains difficult to determine the prevalence or incidence of anaphylaxis in the population due to the long absence of a consensus definition, the fact that analyses are performed on various population groups and the use of different data collection methodologies. In the United States, anaphylaxis mortality ranges from 0.63 to 0.76 cases per million inhabitants, with 58% of these deaths due to drug anaphylaxis. The risk factors for anaphylaxis are ramipril and metoprolol use, which is common in patients with cardiovascular disease. Also, a higher level of gliadin following excess gluten intake is associated with a higher incidence of anaphylaxis. Drugs, food and insect stings have long been known as anaphylaxis inductors. In diagnosis, determination of serum tryptase concentration is used. In patients with normal tryptase concentration, it is appropriate to screen other inflammatory mediators. The authors of this article present new findings on anaphylaxis in the literature and recommended practices of professional societies in the context of public health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"volume\":\"40 Suppl1\",\"pages\":\"3-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro endocrinology letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro endocrinology letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过敏性反应患者人数的不断增加是临床医护人员和公共卫生专业人员面临的一项现代挑战。由于长期以来缺乏一致的定义、对不同人群进行分析以及使用不同的数据收集方法,确定过敏性休克在人群中的流行率或发病率仍然十分困难。在美国,过敏性休克的死亡率为每百万居民 0.63 至 0.76 例,其中 58% 的死亡是由于药物过敏性休克。过敏性休克的风险因素是使用雷米普利和美托洛尔,这在心血管疾病患者中很常见。此外,摄入过量麸质食品后胶质蛋白水平升高,也与过敏性休克的发病率升高有关。长期以来,药物、食物和昆虫叮咬一直是过敏性休克的诱发因素。诊断时可使用血清色氨酸酶浓度测定。对于胰蛋白酶浓度正常的患者,宜筛查其他炎症介质。本文作者介绍了文献中关于过敏性休克的新发现以及专业协会在公共卫生方面的建议做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anaphylaxis in Public Health.

The increasing number of patients with anaphylactic reactions is a modern challenge for healthcare professionals in clinical practice and public health professionals. It remains difficult to determine the prevalence or incidence of anaphylaxis in the population due to the long absence of a consensus definition, the fact that analyses are performed on various population groups and the use of different data collection methodologies. In the United States, anaphylaxis mortality ranges from 0.63 to 0.76 cases per million inhabitants, with 58% of these deaths due to drug anaphylaxis. The risk factors for anaphylaxis are ramipril and metoprolol use, which is common in patients with cardiovascular disease. Also, a higher level of gliadin following excess gluten intake is associated with a higher incidence of anaphylaxis. Drugs, food and insect stings have long been known as anaphylaxis inductors. In diagnosis, determination of serum tryptase concentration is used. In patients with normal tryptase concentration, it is appropriate to screen other inflammatory mediators. The authors of this article present new findings on anaphylaxis in the literature and recommended practices of professional societies in the context of public health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信