医疗优先调度系统 ® 在识别吸毒过量预防服务机构中需要胸外按压的患者方面的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Richard Armour, Brian Grunau, Sammy Iammarino, Jane Buxton, Brooke Kinniburgh, Heather Burgess, Kali-Olt Sedgemore, Paul Choisil, Suzanne Nielsen, Linda Ross
{"title":"医疗优先调度系统 ® 在识别吸毒过量预防服务机构中需要胸外按压的患者方面的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Richard Armour, Brian Grunau, Sammy Iammarino, Jane Buxton, Brooke Kinniburgh, Heather Burgess, Kali-Olt Sedgemore, Paul Choisil, Suzanne Nielsen, Linda Ross","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS<sup>®</sup> had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The ability of MPDS<sup>®</sup> to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Medical Priority Dispatch System® in Identifying Patients Requiring Chest Compressions at Overdose Prevention Services: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Armour, Brian Grunau, Sammy Iammarino, Jane Buxton, Brooke Kinniburgh, Heather Burgess, Kali-Olt Sedgemore, Paul Choisil, Suzanne Nielsen, Linda Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS<sup>®</sup> had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The ability of MPDS<sup>®</sup> to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:医疗优先调度系统 (MPDS) ® 用于根据急症程度对 9-1-1 电话进行分流,某些编码的疑似院外心脏骤停 (OHCA) 患者将接受远程心肺复苏 (T-CPR)。然而,这对于药物中毒急诊患者来说可能具有挑战性,因为他们可能与 OHCA 相似。我们试图研究该系统在正确识别需要进行 T-CPR 的病例方面的性能,特别是在药物滥用预防服务机构(OPS):这项回顾性队列研究包括省急救医疗系统(EMS)接诊的患者(2019 年 5 月 1 日至 2023 年 1 月 31 日)。我们计算了 MPDS ® 评估病例是否需要 T-CPR 指导的诊断性能与 EMS 临床医生到达时是否发现患者无脉搏的金标准。我们比较了不同分组的诊断效果,特别是 OPS 与其他地点的比较,以及药物中毒分类病例与其他病例分类的比较:将 OPS 与其他地点进行比较,MPDS ® 的灵敏度相似(66.7% 对 62.4%,p = 0.4),但特异性较低(87.3% 对 98.1%,p ® 在 OPS 地点为 0.381,而在其他地点为 0.383;阳性似然比为 5.24,而在其他地点为 32.36。与其他 9-1-1 事件相比,MPDS ® 对药物中毒急症患者的灵敏度更高(83.6% 对 60.6%,p 讨论和结论:MPDS ® 在正确识别需要远程通信员心肺复苏指导的患者方面的能力在 OPS 环境和其他地点之间存在差异,在 OPS 环境下,经常建议对未发生 OHCA 的患者进行 T-CPR 。需要与药物使用者合作制定不同的策略,以便在急救服务到达之前更好地调整调度指示,避免延误救生干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of the Medical Priority Dispatch System® in Identifying Patients Requiring Chest Compressions at Overdose Prevention Services: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and aims: The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS).

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications.

Results: Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS® was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, p = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, p < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, p < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, p < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS® had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, p < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, p < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, p < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, p = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88.

Discussion and conclusions: The ability of MPDS® to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信