Richard Armour, Brian Grunau, Sammy Iammarino, Jane Buxton, Brooke Kinniburgh, Heather Burgess, Kali-Olt Sedgemore, Paul Choisil, Suzanne Nielsen, Linda Ross
{"title":"医疗优先调度系统 ® 在识别吸毒过量预防服务机构中需要胸外按压的患者方面的性能:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Richard Armour, Brian Grunau, Sammy Iammarino, Jane Buxton, Brooke Kinniburgh, Heather Burgess, Kali-Olt Sedgemore, Paul Choisil, Suzanne Nielsen, Linda Ross","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS<sup>®</sup> had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The ability of MPDS<sup>®</sup> to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Medical Priority Dispatch System® in Identifying Patients Requiring Chest Compressions at Overdose Prevention Services: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Armour, Brian Grunau, Sammy Iammarino, Jane Buxton, Brooke Kinniburgh, Heather Burgess, Kali-Olt Sedgemore, Paul Choisil, Suzanne Nielsen, Linda Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS<sup>®</sup> was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS<sup>®</sup> had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, <i>p</i> < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, <i>p</i> = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The ability of MPDS<sup>®</sup> to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2319150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of the Medical Priority Dispatch System® in Identifying Patients Requiring Chest Compressions at Overdose Prevention Services: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Background and aims: The Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS)® is used to triage 9-1-1 calls according to acuity, with certain coding receiving telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR) for suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, this may be challenging for those with drug poisoning emergencies, who may resemble OHCA. We sought to examine the performance of the system to correctly identify cases requiring T-CPR, specifically at overdose prevention services (OPS).
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients attended by the provincial emergency medical system (EMS) (May 1, 2019-January 31, 2023). We calculated the diagnostic performance of MPDS® assessment of whether the case required T-CPR instructions against the gold standard of whether the patient was found pulseless on EMS clinician arrival. We compared performance among subgroups, specifically OPS vs other locations and drug poisoning-classified cases vs other case classifications.
Results: Comparing OPS to other locations, the sensitivity of MPDS® was similar (66.7% vs 62.4%, p = 0.4), with lower specificity (87.3% vs 98.1%, p < 0.01) and positive predictive value (0.3% vs 35.7%, p < 0.01) and higher negative predictive value (99.9% vs 99.4%, p < 0.01). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.381 at OPS locations, compared with 0.383 at other locations, while the positive likelihood ratio was 5.24, compared with 32.36. In patients with drug poisoning emergencies, compared with other 9-1-1 events, MPDS® had higher sensitivity (83.6% vs 60.6%, p < 0.01) but lower specificity (77.6% vs 98.9%, p < 0.01) and positive predictive value (10.5% vs 48.5%, p < 0.01), and similar negative predictive value (99.33% vs 99.35%, p = 0.03). The negative likelihood ratio of MPDS® was 0.212 in drug poisoning emergencies compared with 0.398 for all other presentations, and the positive likelihood ratio was 3.73 compared with 57.88.
Discussion and conclusions: The ability of MPDS® to correctly identify patients needing telecommunicator cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions differed between OPS settings and other locations, frequently recommending T-CPR for patients not suffering OHCA at an OPS. Different strategies developed in collaboration with people who use substances are required to better tailor dispatch instructions prior to EMS arrival to avoid delays in life-saving interventions.
期刊介绍:
Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.