大学医院急诊科逐步实施多学科抗菌药物管理计划的效果和可持续性。

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-02-26 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae026
Lukas Arenz, Annika Porger, Michaela De Michel, Alexandra Weber, Jette Jung, Heidi Horns, Sandra Gscheidle, Tobias Weiglein, Joachim Pircher, Johanna Becker-Lienau, Sophia Horster, Matthias Klein, Rika Draenert
{"title":"大学医院急诊科逐步实施多学科抗菌药物管理计划的效果和可持续性。","authors":"Lukas Arenz, Annika Porger, Michaela De Michel, Alexandra Weber, Jette Jung, Heidi Horns, Sandra Gscheidle, Tobias Weiglein, Joachim Pircher, Johanna Becker-Lienau, Sophia Horster, Matthias Klein, Rika Draenert","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore effectiveness and sustainability of guideline adherence and antibiotic consumption after establishing treatment guidelines and initiating antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) ward rounds in a university hospital emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered retrospectively from 2017 to 2021 in the LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany. Four time periods were compared: P1 (pre-intervention period); P2 (distribution of guideline pocket cards); P3 (reassessment after 3 years); and P4 (refresher of guideline pocket cards and additional daily AMS ward rounds for different medical disciplines). Primary outcome was adherence to guideline pocket cards for community-acquired pneumonia, cystitis, pyelonephritis and COVID-19-associated bacterial pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were reduction in antibiotic consumption and adherence to AMS specialist recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1324 patients. Guideline adherence increased in P2 for each of the infectious diseases entities. After 3 years (P3), guideline adherence decreased again, but was mostly on a higher level than in P1. AMS ward rounds resulted in an additional increase in guideline adherence (P1/P2: 47% versus 58.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.005; P2/P3: 58.6% versus 57.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.750; P3/P4: 57.3% versus 72.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Adherence increased significantly, not only during workdays but also on weekends/nightshifts. Adherence to AMS specialist recommendations was excellent (91.3%). We observed an increase in use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics and a decrease in the application of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing treatment guidelines in the ED is effective. However, positive effects can be diminished over time. Daily AMS ward rounds are useful, not only to restore but to further increase guideline adherence significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"6 1","pages":"dlae026"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895698/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect and sustainability of a stepwise implemented multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programme in a university hospital emergency department.\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Arenz, Annika Porger, Michaela De Michel, Alexandra Weber, Jette Jung, Heidi Horns, Sandra Gscheidle, Tobias Weiglein, Joachim Pircher, Johanna Becker-Lienau, Sophia Horster, Matthias Klein, Rika Draenert\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlae026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore effectiveness and sustainability of guideline adherence and antibiotic consumption after establishing treatment guidelines and initiating antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) ward rounds in a university hospital emergency department (ED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were gathered retrospectively from 2017 to 2021 in the LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany. Four time periods were compared: P1 (pre-intervention period); P2 (distribution of guideline pocket cards); P3 (reassessment after 3 years); and P4 (refresher of guideline pocket cards and additional daily AMS ward rounds for different medical disciplines). Primary outcome was adherence to guideline pocket cards for community-acquired pneumonia, cystitis, pyelonephritis and COVID-19-associated bacterial pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were reduction in antibiotic consumption and adherence to AMS specialist recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1324 patients. Guideline adherence increased in P2 for each of the infectious diseases entities. After 3 years (P3), guideline adherence decreased again, but was mostly on a higher level than in P1. AMS ward rounds resulted in an additional increase in guideline adherence (P1/P2: 47% versus 58.6%, <i>P</i> = 0.005; P2/P3: 58.6% versus 57.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.750; P3/P4: 57.3% versus 72.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Adherence increased significantly, not only during workdays but also on weekends/nightshifts. Adherence to AMS specialist recommendations was excellent (91.3%). We observed an increase in use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics and a decrease in the application of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Establishing treatment guidelines in the ED is effective. However, positive effects can be diminished over time. Daily AMS ward rounds are useful, not only to restore but to further increase guideline adherence significantly.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"dlae026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895698/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在大学医院急诊科(ED)制定治疗指南并启动抗菌药物管理(AMS)查房后,探讨指南遵守情况和抗生素消耗的有效性和可持续性:在德国慕尼黑 LMU 大学医院回顾性收集了 2017 年至 2021 年的数据。对四个时间段进行了比较:P1(干预前);P2(分发指南袖珍卡);P3(3 年后重新评估);P4(指南袖珍卡的复习和针对不同医疗学科的额外每日 AMS 查房)。主要结果是社区获得性肺炎、膀胱炎、肾盂肾炎和 COVID-19 相关细菌性肺炎患者对袖珍指南卡的依从性。次要结果是抗生素用量的减少和对 AMS 专家建议的遵守情况:研究纳入了 1324 名患者。在 P2 阶段,对每种传染病实体的指南遵守率都有所提高。3 年后(P3),指南的依从性再次下降,但与 P1 相比,大多处于较高水平。AMS 病房查房使指南的依从性进一步提高(P1/P2:47% 对 58.6%,P = 0.005;P2/P3:58.6% 对 57.3%,P = 0.750;P3/P4:57.3% 对 72.5%,P 结论:在急诊室建立治疗指南是非常重要的:在急诊室制定治疗指南是有效的。然而,随着时间的推移,积极效果可能会减弱。每日 AMS 病房查房不仅有助于恢复,还能进一步显著提高指南的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect and sustainability of a stepwise implemented multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship programme in a university hospital emergency department.

Objectives: To explore effectiveness and sustainability of guideline adherence and antibiotic consumption after establishing treatment guidelines and initiating antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) ward rounds in a university hospital emergency department (ED).

Methods: Data were gathered retrospectively from 2017 to 2021 in the LMU University Hospital in Munich, Germany. Four time periods were compared: P1 (pre-intervention period); P2 (distribution of guideline pocket cards); P3 (reassessment after 3 years); and P4 (refresher of guideline pocket cards and additional daily AMS ward rounds for different medical disciplines). Primary outcome was adherence to guideline pocket cards for community-acquired pneumonia, cystitis, pyelonephritis and COVID-19-associated bacterial pneumonia. Secondary outcomes were reduction in antibiotic consumption and adherence to AMS specialist recommendations.

Results: The study included 1324 patients. Guideline adherence increased in P2 for each of the infectious diseases entities. After 3 years (P3), guideline adherence decreased again, but was mostly on a higher level than in P1. AMS ward rounds resulted in an additional increase in guideline adherence (P1/P2: 47% versus 58.6%, P = 0.005; P2/P3: 58.6% versus 57.3%, P = 0.750; P3/P4: 57.3% versus 72.5%, P < 0.001). Adherence increased significantly, not only during workdays but also on weekends/nightshifts. Adherence to AMS specialist recommendations was excellent (91.3%). We observed an increase in use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics and a decrease in the application of fluoroquinolones and cephalosporins.

Conclusions: Establishing treatment guidelines in the ED is effective. However, positive effects can be diminished over time. Daily AMS ward rounds are useful, not only to restore but to further increase guideline adherence significantly.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信