Christopher B Johns, Travis W Fleming, Skyler R Brown, Rebekah B Black, A Shaun Rowe
{"title":"使用丙泊酚、氯维地平或两者的患者高甘油三酯血症的发生率。","authors":"Christopher B Johns, Travis W Fleming, Skyler R Brown, Rebekah B Black, A Shaun Rowe","doi":"10.1177/10600280241232991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol and clevidipine (PC) are commonly used in the treatment of critically ill patients. While both medications are lipid emulsions, there is limited evidence concerning the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) when these agents are used individually or concurrently.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the effects of propofol, clevidipine, or concurrent PC on triglycerides (TGs) and related outcomes in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were included if they received ≥24 hours of continuous propofol and/or clevidipine. Excluded were those without TG levels after ≥24 hours of infusion, baseline HTG, acute pancreatitis at admission, or receiving total parenteral nutrition with lipids. The primary outcome was incidence of HTG (defined as a TG level >400 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included median and peak TG levels, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, total lipid infused, time to peak TG level, peak lipase level, and development of pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 190 patients were studied: 109 in the propofol group, 50 in the clevidipine group, and 31 in the PC group. Incidence of HTG was similar (19 [17.4%] vs 6 [12%] vs 4 [12.9%] patients, <i>P</i> = 0.6246). Peak and median TG levels were similar for propofol, clevidipine, and PC groups (216 mg/dL vs 189.5 mg/dL vs 205 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.7069; 177 mg/dL vs 185.5 mg/dL vs 177 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.6791).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There was a similar incidence of HTG in all groups. The results of this study suggest that the concurrent use of PC should not modify the frequency of TG level monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Hypertriglyceridemia in Patients on Propofol, Clevidipine, or Both.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher B Johns, Travis W Fleming, Skyler R Brown, Rebekah B Black, A Shaun Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280241232991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Propofol and clevidipine (PC) are commonly used in the treatment of critically ill patients. While both medications are lipid emulsions, there is limited evidence concerning the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) when these agents are used individually or concurrently.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to determine the effects of propofol, clevidipine, or concurrent PC on triglycerides (TGs) and related outcomes in critically ill adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were included if they received ≥24 hours of continuous propofol and/or clevidipine. Excluded were those without TG levels after ≥24 hours of infusion, baseline HTG, acute pancreatitis at admission, or receiving total parenteral nutrition with lipids. The primary outcome was incidence of HTG (defined as a TG level >400 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included median and peak TG levels, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, total lipid infused, time to peak TG level, peak lipase level, and development of pancreatitis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 190 patients were studied: 109 in the propofol group, 50 in the clevidipine group, and 31 in the PC group. Incidence of HTG was similar (19 [17.4%] vs 6 [12%] vs 4 [12.9%] patients, <i>P</i> = 0.6246). Peak and median TG levels were similar for propofol, clevidipine, and PC groups (216 mg/dL vs 189.5 mg/dL vs 205 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.7069; 177 mg/dL vs 185.5 mg/dL vs 177 mg/dL, <i>P</i> = 0.6791).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There was a similar incidence of HTG in all groups. The results of this study suggest that the concurrent use of PC should not modify the frequency of TG level monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241232991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241232991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:丙泊酚和氯维地平(PC)是治疗重症患者的常用药物。虽然这两种药物都是脂质乳剂,但关于单独或同时使用这些药物时高甘油三酯血症(HTG)发生率的证据有限:本研究旨在确定丙泊酚、氯维地平或同时使用 PC 对重症成人患者甘油三酯(TGs)及相关结果的影响:这是一项在学术医疗中心进行的回顾性队列研究。连续接受异丙酚和/或氯维地平治疗≥24小时的患者被纳入研究范围。不包括输注≥24小时后TG水平不达标的患者、基线HTG患者、入院时患有急性胰腺炎的患者或接受含脂类全肠外营养的患者。主要结果是高血糖发生率(定义为 TG 水平 >400 mg/dL)。次要结果包括 TG 水平中位数和峰值、住院时间、重症监护室住院时间、输注脂质总量、达到 TG 峰值的时间、脂肪酶峰值水平和胰腺炎的发生:共对 190 名患者进行了研究:丙泊酚组 109 人,氯维地平组 50 人,PC 组 31 人。高血糖发生率相似(19 [17.4%] vs 6 [12%] vs 4 [12.9%],P = 0.6246)。丙泊酚、氯维地平和 PC 组的 TG 峰值和中位水平相似(216 mg/dL vs 189.5 mg/dL vs 205 mg/dL,P = 0.7069;177 mg/dL vs 185.5 mg/dL vs 177 mg/dL,P = 0.6791):结论和相关性:所有研究组的高血压发生率相似。本研究结果表明,同时使用 PC 不应改变监测 TG 水平的频率。
Incidence of Hypertriglyceridemia in Patients on Propofol, Clevidipine, or Both.
Background: Propofol and clevidipine (PC) are commonly used in the treatment of critically ill patients. While both medications are lipid emulsions, there is limited evidence concerning the incidence of hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) when these agents are used individually or concurrently.
Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the effects of propofol, clevidipine, or concurrent PC on triglycerides (TGs) and related outcomes in critically ill adults.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center. Patients were included if they received ≥24 hours of continuous propofol and/or clevidipine. Excluded were those without TG levels after ≥24 hours of infusion, baseline HTG, acute pancreatitis at admission, or receiving total parenteral nutrition with lipids. The primary outcome was incidence of HTG (defined as a TG level >400 mg/dL). Secondary outcomes included median and peak TG levels, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, total lipid infused, time to peak TG level, peak lipase level, and development of pancreatitis.
Results: In total, 190 patients were studied: 109 in the propofol group, 50 in the clevidipine group, and 31 in the PC group. Incidence of HTG was similar (19 [17.4%] vs 6 [12%] vs 4 [12.9%] patients, P = 0.6246). Peak and median TG levels were similar for propofol, clevidipine, and PC groups (216 mg/dL vs 189.5 mg/dL vs 205 mg/dL, P = 0.7069; 177 mg/dL vs 185.5 mg/dL vs 177 mg/dL, P = 0.6791).
Conclusions and relevance: There was a similar incidence of HTG in all groups. The results of this study suggest that the concurrent use of PC should not modify the frequency of TG level monitoring.