为可持续城市排水筹资的收费和奖励模式及价值

Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente, Karla Maria Silva de Faria, K. Formiga
{"title":"为可持续城市排水筹资的收费和奖励模式及价值","authors":"Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente, Karla Maria Silva de Faria, K. Formiga","doi":"10.14393/sn-v36-2024-71211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction.","PeriodicalId":510043,"journal":{"name":"Sociedade & Natureza","volume":"41 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula Camargo de Vicente, Karla Maria Silva de Faria, K. Formiga\",\"doi\":\"10.14393/sn-v36-2024-71211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":510043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociedade & Natureza\",\"volume\":\"41 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociedade & Natureza\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14393/sn-v36-2024-71211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociedade & Natureza","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14393/sn-v36-2024-71211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,城市排水系统的成本费用都受到了影响,其管理的可持续性也受到了挑战。需要制定战略,让排水系统的用户更多地参与进来,承担该系统的费用,并通过可持续技术遏制和延缓地表雨水流向公共管网,与他们的物业系统合作。激励这些用户采用可最大限度减少其财产外流的技术,是实施收费的基本策略。因此,这项工作旨在通过系统回顾(SR),评估排水系统用户提供城市环境服务的排水收费和激励措施的价值和方法。该系统综述是通过在 Web of Science(WoS)和 Scopus 平台上进行搜索而得出的,并使用 StArt 系统对其数据进行了分析。在 2010 年至 2021 年间发表的 199 篇研究文章中,我们可以将收费和激励措施联系起来。在收费模式方面,ERU 方法(等效住宅单位)占主导地位。在激励模式方面,使用最多的是减税。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models and Values of Fees and Incentives for Financing Sustainable Urban Drainage
Challenges are observed worldwide in the cost of urban drainage through fees compromising the sustainability of its management. Strategies are needed for greater involvement of users of the drainage system, assuming their responsibility for the cost of this system and collaborating with the system on their properties through the containment and delay of the surface runoff of rainwater to the public network from sustainable technologies. Incentives for these users to implement technologies that minimize the outflow of their properties can be an essential strategy for implementing fees. Therefore, this work aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review (SR), the values and methods of drainage fees and incentives for urban environmental services provided by users of drainage systems. The SR was developed from a search on the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus platforms, whose data were analyzed using the StArt system. Among the 199 articles studied and published between 2010 and 2021, it was possible to relate fees and incentives practiced. Concerning fee models, the ERU method (Equivalent Residential Unit) was predominant. Regarding the incentive models, the most used was tax reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信