在治疗大肠埃希菌尿路感染时,隔日一次阿米卡星与每日一次美罗培南的比较

Abdel-Moneim Ghorab, Saied A.A. Mostafa, Sultan Hamdan Alsakran
{"title":"在治疗大肠埃希菌尿路感染时,隔日一次阿米卡星与每日一次美罗培南的比较","authors":"Abdel-Moneim Ghorab, Saied A.A. Mostafa, Sultan Hamdan Alsakran","doi":"10.55675/sjms.v1i6.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aim: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common medical challenge, especially in the light of increased antibiotic resistance. This work aimed to compare between amikacin (3 doses, once each other day) with a daily dose of meropenem (once daily for seven days) for the treatment of urinary tract infection caused by Escherichia Coli.   \nPatients and Methods:  70 patients with confirmed UTI infection by E. Coli were included and divided for two groups. The first was treated by amikacin 15mg/kg once every 48 hours for seven days. The second group was treated by meropenem 1 g three times daily for one week. Then, urinary culture and sensitivity was re-performed and tested against the commonest panel of antibiotics. The clinical manifestations were documented before treatment and one week after treatment. \nResults:  There was no significant difference between groups regarding patient demographics or manifestations of UTI. 54.3% in amikacin and 65.7% in meropenem groups reported previous UTI. The clinical manifestations of UTI include dysuria, frequent urination, flank pain, abdominal pain, fever and suprapubic pain. The treatment was associated with eradication of E. Coli in 60.0% and 54.3% in Amikacin and meropenem respectively, with no significant differences between groups at the end of the first week and at that time, the most sensitive drugs were nitrofurantoin (34.3%) followed by meropenem (22.9%) and amikacin (18.6%). However, the highest resistance was registered for cefepime and cefotaxime (41.4%) followed by ceftazidime-clavulanic acid (40.0%). Clinical manifestations of UTI were significantly reduced in both groups one week after treatment with no significant differences between groups. \nConclusion: Amikacin could be considered as is an effective and safe alternative to meropenem for treatment of UTI due to E. Coli.","PeriodicalId":486005,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar","volume":"11 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amikacin once every other day versus Daily Meropenem for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection with Escherichia Coli\",\"authors\":\"Abdel-Moneim Ghorab, Saied A.A. Mostafa, Sultan Hamdan Alsakran\",\"doi\":\"10.55675/sjms.v1i6.77\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aim: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common medical challenge, especially in the light of increased antibiotic resistance. This work aimed to compare between amikacin (3 doses, once each other day) with a daily dose of meropenem (once daily for seven days) for the treatment of urinary tract infection caused by Escherichia Coli.   \\nPatients and Methods:  70 patients with confirmed UTI infection by E. Coli were included and divided for two groups. The first was treated by amikacin 15mg/kg once every 48 hours for seven days. The second group was treated by meropenem 1 g three times daily for one week. Then, urinary culture and sensitivity was re-performed and tested against the commonest panel of antibiotics. The clinical manifestations were documented before treatment and one week after treatment. \\nResults:  There was no significant difference between groups regarding patient demographics or manifestations of UTI. 54.3% in amikacin and 65.7% in meropenem groups reported previous UTI. The clinical manifestations of UTI include dysuria, frequent urination, flank pain, abdominal pain, fever and suprapubic pain. The treatment was associated with eradication of E. Coli in 60.0% and 54.3% in Amikacin and meropenem respectively, with no significant differences between groups at the end of the first week and at that time, the most sensitive drugs were nitrofurantoin (34.3%) followed by meropenem (22.9%) and amikacin (18.6%). However, the highest resistance was registered for cefepime and cefotaxime (41.4%) followed by ceftazidime-clavulanic acid (40.0%). Clinical manifestations of UTI were significantly reduced in both groups one week after treatment with no significant differences between groups. \\nConclusion: Amikacin could be considered as is an effective and safe alternative to meropenem for treatment of UTI due to E. Coli.\",\"PeriodicalId\":486005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar\",\"volume\":\"11 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55675/sjms.v1i6.77\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific Journal of Medical Scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55675/sjms.v1i6.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尿路感染(UTI)是一种常见的医学难题,尤其是在抗生素耐药性增加的情况下。本研究旨在比较阿米卡星(3 次,隔日一次)与美罗培南(每日一次,连续 7 天)在治疗由大肠埃希菌引起的尿路感染方面的疗效。 患者和方法:70 名确诊为大肠埃希菌感染的尿路感染患者被分为两组。第一组使用阿米卡星 15 毫克/千克,每 48 小时一次,持续 7 天。第二组使用美罗培南 1 克,每天三次,持续一周。然后,重新进行尿培养和药敏试验,并用最常用的抗生素进行检测。记录治疗前和治疗后一周的临床表现。结果显示 各组患者在人口统计学和UTI表现方面无明显差异。阿米卡星组和美罗培南组中分别有 54.3% 和 65.7% 的患者表示曾患UTI。尿毒症的临床表现包括排尿困难、尿频、侧腹疼痛、腹痛、发热和耻骨上疼痛。第一周结束时,阿米卡星组和美罗培南组分别有 60.0% 和 54.3% 的患者通过治疗根除了大肠杆菌,组间无明显差异,当时最敏感的药物是硝基呋喃妥因(34.3%),其次是美罗培南(22.9%)和阿米卡星(18.6%)。然而,耐药性最高的是头孢吡肟和头孢他啶(41.4%),其次是头孢唑肟-克拉维酸(40.0%)。治疗一周后,两组患者的尿毒症临床表现均明显减少,组间无明显差异。结论在治疗由大肠杆菌引起的尿毒症时,阿米卡星可作为美罗培南的一种有效而安全的替代药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amikacin once every other day versus Daily Meropenem for Treatment of Urinary Tract Infection with Escherichia Coli
Background and Aim: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common medical challenge, especially in the light of increased antibiotic resistance. This work aimed to compare between amikacin (3 doses, once each other day) with a daily dose of meropenem (once daily for seven days) for the treatment of urinary tract infection caused by Escherichia Coli.   Patients and Methods:  70 patients with confirmed UTI infection by E. Coli were included and divided for two groups. The first was treated by amikacin 15mg/kg once every 48 hours for seven days. The second group was treated by meropenem 1 g three times daily for one week. Then, urinary culture and sensitivity was re-performed and tested against the commonest panel of antibiotics. The clinical manifestations were documented before treatment and one week after treatment. Results:  There was no significant difference between groups regarding patient demographics or manifestations of UTI. 54.3% in amikacin and 65.7% in meropenem groups reported previous UTI. The clinical manifestations of UTI include dysuria, frequent urination, flank pain, abdominal pain, fever and suprapubic pain. The treatment was associated with eradication of E. Coli in 60.0% and 54.3% in Amikacin and meropenem respectively, with no significant differences between groups at the end of the first week and at that time, the most sensitive drugs were nitrofurantoin (34.3%) followed by meropenem (22.9%) and amikacin (18.6%). However, the highest resistance was registered for cefepime and cefotaxime (41.4%) followed by ceftazidime-clavulanic acid (40.0%). Clinical manifestations of UTI were significantly reduced in both groups one week after treatment with no significant differences between groups. Conclusion: Amikacin could be considered as is an effective and safe alternative to meropenem for treatment of UTI due to E. Coli.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信