在混合结构中添加凸形单平面螺钉是否能改善青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路融合术的三维手术矫正效果?

Laurie Simon, Mikael Finoco, Florence Julien-Marsollier, Adèle Happiette, A.-L. Simon, Brice Ilharreborde
{"title":"在混合结构中添加凸形单平面螺钉是否能改善青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路融合术的三维手术矫正效果?","authors":"Laurie Simon, Mikael Finoco, Florence Julien-Marsollier, Adèle Happiette, A.-L. Simon, Brice Ilharreborde","doi":"10.1177/18632521231220388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hybrid techniques using thoracic sublaminar bands have proved their efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior fusion, but clinical axial correction sometimes remained disappointing. One solution found was “the frame technique” and the second alternative was the replacement of the convex sublaminar bands by periapical uniplanar screws. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both techniques in a consecutive cohort of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. All patients undergoing primary posterior fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between January 2017 and March 2020 were included. Two groups were compared: Group 1 with thoracic sublaminar bands only and Group 2 with periapical uniplanar screws. All patients underwent standing stereoradiographs. The main frontal, sagittal, and axial (apical vertebra rotation) radiological parameters of interest were analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society 30 score. A total of 147 adolescents were included (Group 1, n = 73 and Group 2, n = 74 patients). In the frontal plane, a greater reduction index was observed in Group 2 (68% versus 62%, p < 0.001) as well as a better apical axial correction (67.8% versus 46.6%, p = 0.03). The number of thoracoplasty performed was reduced (6.7% versus 20.5%, p = 0.02) in Group 2, with a significant decrease in the rate of mechanical complication. No significant loss of correction was observed during follow-up in any of the group. The adjunction of convex uniplanar screws at the periapical levels improved the three-dimensional surgical correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with hybrid constructs. level III, retrospective comparative study","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":"49 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the addition of convex uniplanar screws in hybrid constructs improve 3D surgical correction in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior fusion?\",\"authors\":\"Laurie Simon, Mikael Finoco, Florence Julien-Marsollier, Adèle Happiette, A.-L. Simon, Brice Ilharreborde\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18632521231220388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hybrid techniques using thoracic sublaminar bands have proved their efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior fusion, but clinical axial correction sometimes remained disappointing. One solution found was “the frame technique” and the second alternative was the replacement of the convex sublaminar bands by periapical uniplanar screws. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both techniques in a consecutive cohort of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. All patients undergoing primary posterior fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between January 2017 and March 2020 were included. Two groups were compared: Group 1 with thoracic sublaminar bands only and Group 2 with periapical uniplanar screws. All patients underwent standing stereoradiographs. The main frontal, sagittal, and axial (apical vertebra rotation) radiological parameters of interest were analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society 30 score. A total of 147 adolescents were included (Group 1, n = 73 and Group 2, n = 74 patients). In the frontal plane, a greater reduction index was observed in Group 2 (68% versus 62%, p < 0.001) as well as a better apical axial correction (67.8% versus 46.6%, p = 0.03). The number of thoracoplasty performed was reduced (6.7% versus 20.5%, p = 0.02) in Group 2, with a significant decrease in the rate of mechanical complication. No significant loss of correction was observed during follow-up in any of the group. The adjunction of convex uniplanar screws at the periapical levels improved the three-dimensional surgical correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with hybrid constructs. level III, retrospective comparative study\",\"PeriodicalId\":138259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"49 45\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521231220388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18632521231220388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸后路融合术中,使用胸椎椎板下带的混合技术已证明了其有效性,但临床轴向矫正效果有时仍令人失望。已找到的一种解决方案是 "框架技术",第二种替代方案是用根尖周围单平面螺钉取代凸形椎板下带。本研究的目的是在连续的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者中比较这两种技术的临床和放射学效果。研究纳入了2017年1月至2020年3月期间所有接受初级后路融合术治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者。两组患者进行了比较:第1组仅使用胸椎层下带,第2组使用根尖周围单平面螺钉。所有患者均接受了立位立体放射摄影。对主要的正面、矢状和轴向(顶椎旋转)放射学参数进行了分析。使用脊柱侧凸研究协会 30 分评估功能结果。共纳入了 147 名青少年患者(第一组 73 人,第二组 74 人)。在额面,观察到第 2 组的脊柱缩小指数更高(68% 对 62%,p < 0.001),心尖轴向矫正效果更好(67.8% 对 46.6%,p = 0.03)。第二组进行胸廓成形术的次数减少(6.7% 对 20.5%,p = 0.02),机械并发症的发生率显著降低。各组随访期间均未观察到明显的矫正损失。在根尖周围水平连接凸形单平面螺钉改善了使用混合结构治疗青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的三维手术矫正效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the addition of convex uniplanar screws in hybrid constructs improve 3D surgical correction in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior fusion?
Hybrid techniques using thoracic sublaminar bands have proved their efficacy in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis posterior fusion, but clinical axial correction sometimes remained disappointing. One solution found was “the frame technique” and the second alternative was the replacement of the convex sublaminar bands by periapical uniplanar screws. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of both techniques in a consecutive cohort of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. All patients undergoing primary posterior fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis between January 2017 and March 2020 were included. Two groups were compared: Group 1 with thoracic sublaminar bands only and Group 2 with periapical uniplanar screws. All patients underwent standing stereoradiographs. The main frontal, sagittal, and axial (apical vertebra rotation) radiological parameters of interest were analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Scoliosis Research Society 30 score. A total of 147 adolescents were included (Group 1, n = 73 and Group 2, n = 74 patients). In the frontal plane, a greater reduction index was observed in Group 2 (68% versus 62%, p < 0.001) as well as a better apical axial correction (67.8% versus 46.6%, p = 0.03). The number of thoracoplasty performed was reduced (6.7% versus 20.5%, p = 0.02) in Group 2, with a significant decrease in the rate of mechanical complication. No significant loss of correction was observed during follow-up in any of the group. The adjunction of convex uniplanar screws at the periapical levels improved the three-dimensional surgical correction of thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with hybrid constructs. level III, retrospective comparative study
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信