吞咽困难的临床和仪器吞咽评估

Robyn Haas, Sharon Bailey
{"title":"吞咽困难的临床和仪器吞咽评估","authors":"Robyn Haas, Sharon Bailey","doi":"10.51731/cjht.2024.833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What Is the Issue? \n \nDysphagia, or swallowing impairment, is a common complication of many health conditions. To assess patients for dysphagia, speech-language pathologists may use instrumental swallowing assessments or clinical assessments. \nInstrumental swallowing assessments are more accurate and comprehensive, but they also require more time and resources. \nTo help inform decisions about whether it is appropriate to increase use of clinical assessments and limit the use of instrumental swallowing assessments, it is important to understand current best practices as well as the comparative clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy. \n \nWhat Did We Do? \n \nWe searched for literature evaluating the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of instrumental swallowing assessments versus clinical assessments for patients with suspected dysphagia. We also searched for evidence-based guidelines that provide recommendations about the use of instrumental and clinical assessments for suspected dysphagia. \nAn information specialist searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019, and November 30, 2023. \n \nWhat Did We Find? \n \nFour diagnostic test accuracy studies compared various clinical evaluations to instrumental swallowing exams. The tests ranged in their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. Three of the 4 studies concluded that the clinical assessments they examined could be used to identify dysphagia. One of these 3 studies examined multiple clinical evaluations and noted the varying degrees of accuracy among the tests and indicated which of these is most accurate. The fourth study found that further evidence is needed to determine if a clinical feeding evaluation can predict aspiration. We did not find any studies directly evaluating the clinical utility of instrumental swallowing assessments versus clinical evaluation for patients with suspected dysphagia that met the inclusion criteria for this review. \nSix evidence-based guidelines made recommendations related to instrumental and clinical swallowing assessments for dysphagia. These recommendations generally indicated that instrumental assessments should be used when resources allow, or that they should take place in addition to clinical swallowing assessments. \n \nWhat Does This Mean? \n \nHealth care practitioners may wish to conduct an instrumental swallowing assessment, such as a fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or a videofluoroscopic swallowing study for patients for whom there are sufficient resources to do so. \nClinical assessments for dysphagia have the potential to help clinicians diagnose patients with dysphagia without the use of instrumental swallowing assessments, particularly in settings with limited resources. However, this is not the case for all clinical assessments and needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis. \n","PeriodicalId":505661,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","volume":"54 30","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical and Instrumental Swallowing Assessments for Dysphagia\",\"authors\":\"Robyn Haas, Sharon Bailey\",\"doi\":\"10.51731/cjht.2024.833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What Is the Issue? \\n \\nDysphagia, or swallowing impairment, is a common complication of many health conditions. To assess patients for dysphagia, speech-language pathologists may use instrumental swallowing assessments or clinical assessments. \\nInstrumental swallowing assessments are more accurate and comprehensive, but they also require more time and resources. \\nTo help inform decisions about whether it is appropriate to increase use of clinical assessments and limit the use of instrumental swallowing assessments, it is important to understand current best practices as well as the comparative clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy. \\n \\nWhat Did We Do? \\n \\nWe searched for literature evaluating the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of instrumental swallowing assessments versus clinical assessments for patients with suspected dysphagia. We also searched for evidence-based guidelines that provide recommendations about the use of instrumental and clinical assessments for suspected dysphagia. \\nAn information specialist searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019, and November 30, 2023. \\n \\nWhat Did We Find? \\n \\nFour diagnostic test accuracy studies compared various clinical evaluations to instrumental swallowing exams. The tests ranged in their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. Three of the 4 studies concluded that the clinical assessments they examined could be used to identify dysphagia. One of these 3 studies examined multiple clinical evaluations and noted the varying degrees of accuracy among the tests and indicated which of these is most accurate. The fourth study found that further evidence is needed to determine if a clinical feeding evaluation can predict aspiration. We did not find any studies directly evaluating the clinical utility of instrumental swallowing assessments versus clinical evaluation for patients with suspected dysphagia that met the inclusion criteria for this review. \\nSix evidence-based guidelines made recommendations related to instrumental and clinical swallowing assessments for dysphagia. These recommendations generally indicated that instrumental assessments should be used when resources allow, or that they should take place in addition to clinical swallowing assessments. \\n \\nWhat Does This Mean? \\n \\nHealth care practitioners may wish to conduct an instrumental swallowing assessment, such as a fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or a videofluoroscopic swallowing study for patients for whom there are sufficient resources to do so. \\nClinical assessments for dysphagia have the potential to help clinicians diagnose patients with dysphagia without the use of instrumental swallowing assessments, particularly in settings with limited resources. However, this is not the case for all clinical assessments and needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis. \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":505661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"54 30\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51731/cjht.2024.833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题出在哪里? 吞咽困难或吞咽障碍是许多健康问题的常见并发症。为评估患者是否存在吞咽困难,言语病理学家可能会使用仪器吞咽评估或临床评估。工具性吞咽评估更为准确和全面,但也需要更多的时间和资源。为了帮助决定是否应该增加临床评估的使用并限制工具性吞咽评估的使用,了解当前的最佳实践以及临床效用和诊断准确性的比较非常重要。 我们做了什么? 我们搜索了对疑似吞咽困难患者进行仪器吞咽评估与临床评估的临床效用和诊断准确性进行评估的文献。我们还搜索了循证指南,其中提供了对疑似吞咽困难患者使用仪器和临床评估的建议。一位信息专家检索了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 11 月 30 日期间发表的同行评审和灰色文献资料。 我们发现了什么? 四项诊断测试准确性研究将各种临床评估与仪器吞咽检查进行了比较。这些测试的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值各不相同。4 项研究中的 3 项得出结论,它们所检查的临床评估可用于识别吞咽困难。其中一项研究对多种临床评估进行了检查,并指出了各种测试的不同准确度,还指出了哪种测试最准确。第四项研究发现,需要进一步的证据来确定临床喂养评估是否可以预测吸入。我们没有找到任何符合本综述纳入标准的研究,直接评估针对疑似吞咽困难患者的工具性吞咽评估与临床评估的临床效用。六份循证指南就吞咽困难的工具性和临床吞咽评估提出了相关建议。这些建议普遍指出,在资源允许的情况下应使用工具评估,或在临床吞咽评估的基础上进行工具评估。 这意味着什么? 医护人员可能希望对有足够资源的患者进行工具性吞咽评估,如纤维内窥镜吞咽评估或视频荧光吞咽研究。吞咽困难临床评估有可能帮助临床医生诊断吞咽困难患者,而无需使用仪器吞咽评估,尤其是在资源有限的情况下。然而,并非所有临床评估都能做到这一点,需要根据具体情况而定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical and Instrumental Swallowing Assessments for Dysphagia
What Is the Issue? Dysphagia, or swallowing impairment, is a common complication of many health conditions. To assess patients for dysphagia, speech-language pathologists may use instrumental swallowing assessments or clinical assessments. Instrumental swallowing assessments are more accurate and comprehensive, but they also require more time and resources. To help inform decisions about whether it is appropriate to increase use of clinical assessments and limit the use of instrumental swallowing assessments, it is important to understand current best practices as well as the comparative clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy. What Did We Do? We searched for literature evaluating the clinical utility and diagnostic accuracy of instrumental swallowing assessments versus clinical assessments for patients with suspected dysphagia. We also searched for evidence-based guidelines that provide recommendations about the use of instrumental and clinical assessments for suspected dysphagia. An information specialist searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019, and November 30, 2023. What Did We Find? Four diagnostic test accuracy studies compared various clinical evaluations to instrumental swallowing exams. The tests ranged in their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values. Three of the 4 studies concluded that the clinical assessments they examined could be used to identify dysphagia. One of these 3 studies examined multiple clinical evaluations and noted the varying degrees of accuracy among the tests and indicated which of these is most accurate. The fourth study found that further evidence is needed to determine if a clinical feeding evaluation can predict aspiration. We did not find any studies directly evaluating the clinical utility of instrumental swallowing assessments versus clinical evaluation for patients with suspected dysphagia that met the inclusion criteria for this review. Six evidence-based guidelines made recommendations related to instrumental and clinical swallowing assessments for dysphagia. These recommendations generally indicated that instrumental assessments should be used when resources allow, or that they should take place in addition to clinical swallowing assessments. What Does This Mean? Health care practitioners may wish to conduct an instrumental swallowing assessment, such as a fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or a videofluoroscopic swallowing study for patients for whom there are sufficient resources to do so. Clinical assessments for dysphagia have the potential to help clinicians diagnose patients with dysphagia without the use of instrumental swallowing assessments, particularly in settings with limited resources. However, this is not the case for all clinical assessments and needs to be determined on a case-by-case basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信