医疗保健领域采用可穿戴健身技术的驱动因素:通过有机体整合和监管重点理论进行研究

IF 1.2 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Syed Waqar Haider, H. Hashmi, Sayeda Zeenat Maryam
{"title":"医疗保健领域采用可穿戴健身技术的驱动因素:通过有机体整合和监管重点理论进行研究","authors":"Syed Waqar Haider, H. Hashmi, Sayeda Zeenat Maryam","doi":"10.1108/ijphm-11-2022-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn the prior literature, the motivation to adopt wearable fitness technology (WFT) has been linked with either intrinsic or extrinsic. However, how the subcategories of extrinsic motivations (identified, introjected and external) affect the consumers’ WFT adoption decision remains sparse. Furthermore, do regulatory focus (prevention vs promotion) and gender differences the effects of different motivations on WFT adoption is almost unknown in the health-care marketing literature. This study aims to fill the above-mentioned gap and to unfold the WFT adoption beyond the traditional motivation by incorporating the organismic integration theory (part of self-determined theory) and regulatory focus theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study used a questionnaire-based survey. Using the “AMOS” survey, questionnaire responses of 641 respondents were analyzed and validated by using structural equation modeling. All the variables were adopted from the literature.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results show that intrinsic, identified and external motivations have the greatest impact on consumers’ decisions, while introjected motivation was not significant directly. The moderation effects of regulatory focus are significant in such a way that prevention focus influences the introjected motivation and promotion focus affects the external motivation and WFT adoption decision. Furthermore, the findings on gender moderation suggest that women are more intrinsically motivated, and men are more externally motivated for WFT adoption.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe new insights and contributions of this study provide a better understanding of WFT adoption and help sellers develop more effective marketing strategies.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study incorporates subcategories of extrinsic motivations to provide a deeper understanding of consumers’ behavior. Furthermore, this study applies a unique framework of organismic integration theory to consumers’ WFT adoption. It is also among very few research that investigate regulatory focus and gender impact on consumers’ WFT adoption.\n","PeriodicalId":51798,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drivers of wearable fitness technology adoption for health care: an investigation through organismic integration and regulatory focus theory\",\"authors\":\"Syed Waqar Haider, H. Hashmi, Sayeda Zeenat Maryam\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijphm-11-2022-0101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn the prior literature, the motivation to adopt wearable fitness technology (WFT) has been linked with either intrinsic or extrinsic. However, how the subcategories of extrinsic motivations (identified, introjected and external) affect the consumers’ WFT adoption decision remains sparse. Furthermore, do regulatory focus (prevention vs promotion) and gender differences the effects of different motivations on WFT adoption is almost unknown in the health-care marketing literature. This study aims to fill the above-mentioned gap and to unfold the WFT adoption beyond the traditional motivation by incorporating the organismic integration theory (part of self-determined theory) and regulatory focus theory.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study used a questionnaire-based survey. Using the “AMOS” survey, questionnaire responses of 641 respondents were analyzed and validated by using structural equation modeling. All the variables were adopted from the literature.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results show that intrinsic, identified and external motivations have the greatest impact on consumers’ decisions, while introjected motivation was not significant directly. The moderation effects of regulatory focus are significant in such a way that prevention focus influences the introjected motivation and promotion focus affects the external motivation and WFT adoption decision. Furthermore, the findings on gender moderation suggest that women are more intrinsically motivated, and men are more externally motivated for WFT adoption.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe new insights and contributions of this study provide a better understanding of WFT adoption and help sellers develop more effective marketing strategies.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study incorporates subcategories of extrinsic motivations to provide a deeper understanding of consumers’ behavior. Furthermore, this study applies a unique framework of organismic integration theory to consumers’ WFT adoption. It is also among very few research that investigate regulatory focus and gender impact on consumers’ WFT adoption.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-11-2022-0101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijphm-11-2022-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 在以往的文献中,采用可穿戴健身技术(WFT)的动机与内在或外在动机有关。然而,外在动机的子类别(识别动机、内驱力动机和外在动机)如何影响消费者采用可穿戴健身技术的决定,目前仍然很少见。此外,保健营销文献中几乎没有关于监管重点(预防与推广)和性别差异对采用 WFT 动机的影响的研究。本研究旨在填补上述空白,并通过结合有机整合理论(自我决定理论的一部分)和监管重点理论,来展开WFT采用超越传统动机的研究。使用 "AMOS "调查表,通过结构方程模型对 641 名受访者的问卷答复进行了分析和验证。研究结果表明,内在动机、识别动机和外在动机对消费者决策的影响最大,而内驱动机对消费者决策的直接影响并不显著。监管重点的调节作用是显著的,即预防重点影响内在动机,促销重点影响外在动机和采用 WFT 的决策。此外,关于性别调节的研究结果表明,在采用 WFT 时,女性的内在动机更强,而男性的外在动机更强。此外,本研究还将有机整合理论的独特框架应用于消费者采用 WFT 的行为。本研究也是极少数调查监管重点和性别对消费者采用 WFT 影响的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drivers of wearable fitness technology adoption for health care: an investigation through organismic integration and regulatory focus theory
Purpose In the prior literature, the motivation to adopt wearable fitness technology (WFT) has been linked with either intrinsic or extrinsic. However, how the subcategories of extrinsic motivations (identified, introjected and external) affect the consumers’ WFT adoption decision remains sparse. Furthermore, do regulatory focus (prevention vs promotion) and gender differences the effects of different motivations on WFT adoption is almost unknown in the health-care marketing literature. This study aims to fill the above-mentioned gap and to unfold the WFT adoption beyond the traditional motivation by incorporating the organismic integration theory (part of self-determined theory) and regulatory focus theory. Design/methodology/approach This study used a questionnaire-based survey. Using the “AMOS” survey, questionnaire responses of 641 respondents were analyzed and validated by using structural equation modeling. All the variables were adopted from the literature. Findings The results show that intrinsic, identified and external motivations have the greatest impact on consumers’ decisions, while introjected motivation was not significant directly. The moderation effects of regulatory focus are significant in such a way that prevention focus influences the introjected motivation and promotion focus affects the external motivation and WFT adoption decision. Furthermore, the findings on gender moderation suggest that women are more intrinsically motivated, and men are more externally motivated for WFT adoption. Practical implications The new insights and contributions of this study provide a better understanding of WFT adoption and help sellers develop more effective marketing strategies. Originality/value This study incorporates subcategories of extrinsic motivations to provide a deeper understanding of consumers’ behavior. Furthermore, this study applies a unique framework of organismic integration theory to consumers’ WFT adoption. It is also among very few research that investigate regulatory focus and gender impact on consumers’ WFT adoption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信