上新世海岸线和大陆边缘的扩张运动:动态地形模型的目标数据集

IF 2.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Andrew Hollyday, Maureen E. Raymo, Jacqueline Austermann, Fred Richards, Mark Hoggard, Alessio Rovere
{"title":"上新世海岸线和大陆边缘的扩张运动:动态地形模型的目标数据集","authors":"Andrew Hollyday, Maureen E. Raymo, Jacqueline Austermann, Fred Richards, Mark Hoggard, Alessio Rovere","doi":"10.5194/egusphere-2023-2099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Global mean sea level during the mid-Pliocene Epoch (~3 Ma), when CO<sub>2</sub> and temperatures were above present levels, was notably higher than today due to reduced global ice sheet coverage. Nevertheless, the extent to which ice sheets responded to Pliocene warmth remains in question, owing to high levels of uncertainty in proxy-based sea-level reconstructions as well as solid Earth dynamic models that have been used to evaluate a limited number of data constraints. Here, we present a global dataset of ten wavecut scarps that formed by successive Pliocene sea-level oscillations and which are observed today at elevations ranging from ~6 to 109 m above sea level. The present-day elevations of these features have been identified using a combination of high-resolution digital elevation models and field mapping. Using the MATLAB interface TerraceM, we extrapolate the cliff and platform surfaces to determine the elevation of the scarp toe, which in most settings is buried under meters of talus. We correct the scarp-toe elevations for glacial isostatic adjustment and find that this process alone cannot explain observed differences in Pliocene paleoshoreline elevations around the globe. We next determine the signal associated with mantle dynamic topography by back-advecting the present-day three-dimensional buoyancy structure of the mantle and calculating the difference in radial surface stresses over the last 3 Myr using the convection code ASPECT. We include a wide range of present-day mantle structures (buoyancy and viscosity) constrained by seismic tomography models, geodynamic observations, and rock mechanics laboratory experiments. Finally, we identify preferred dynamic topography change predictions based on their agreement with scarp elevations and use our most confident result to estimate a Pliocene global mean sea level based on one scarp from De Hoop, South Africa. This inference (11.6 ± 5.2 m) is a downward revision and may imply ice sheets were relatively resistant to warm Pliocene climate conditions. We also conclude, however, that more targeted model development is needed to more reliably infer mid-Pliocene global mean sea level based on all scarps mapped in this study.","PeriodicalId":48749,"journal":{"name":"Earth Surface Dynamics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pliocene shorelines and the epeirogenic motion of continental margins: A target dataset for dynamic topography models\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Hollyday, Maureen E. Raymo, Jacqueline Austermann, Fred Richards, Mark Hoggard, Alessio Rovere\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/egusphere-2023-2099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Abstract.</strong> Global mean sea level during the mid-Pliocene Epoch (~3 Ma), when CO<sub>2</sub> and temperatures were above present levels, was notably higher than today due to reduced global ice sheet coverage. Nevertheless, the extent to which ice sheets responded to Pliocene warmth remains in question, owing to high levels of uncertainty in proxy-based sea-level reconstructions as well as solid Earth dynamic models that have been used to evaluate a limited number of data constraints. Here, we present a global dataset of ten wavecut scarps that formed by successive Pliocene sea-level oscillations and which are observed today at elevations ranging from ~6 to 109 m above sea level. The present-day elevations of these features have been identified using a combination of high-resolution digital elevation models and field mapping. Using the MATLAB interface TerraceM, we extrapolate the cliff and platform surfaces to determine the elevation of the scarp toe, which in most settings is buried under meters of talus. We correct the scarp-toe elevations for glacial isostatic adjustment and find that this process alone cannot explain observed differences in Pliocene paleoshoreline elevations around the globe. We next determine the signal associated with mantle dynamic topography by back-advecting the present-day three-dimensional buoyancy structure of the mantle and calculating the difference in radial surface stresses over the last 3 Myr using the convection code ASPECT. We include a wide range of present-day mantle structures (buoyancy and viscosity) constrained by seismic tomography models, geodynamic observations, and rock mechanics laboratory experiments. Finally, we identify preferred dynamic topography change predictions based on their agreement with scarp elevations and use our most confident result to estimate a Pliocene global mean sea level based on one scarp from De Hoop, South Africa. This inference (11.6 ± 5.2 m) is a downward revision and may imply ice sheets were relatively resistant to warm Pliocene climate conditions. We also conclude, however, that more targeted model development is needed to more reliably infer mid-Pliocene global mean sea level based on all scarps mapped in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Surface Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Surface Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2099\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Surface Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要上新世中期(约 3 Ma)的全球平均海平面由于全球冰盖覆盖面积的减少而明显高于现在,当时的二氧化碳和气温都高于现在的水平。然而,由于基于代用指标的海平面重建以及用于评估有限数据约束的固体地球动力学模型的高度不确定性,冰盖对上新世变暖的响应程度仍然是个问题。在这里,我们展示了由上新世连续海平面振荡形成的十个波切痕组成的全球数据集,这些波切痕今天在海拔约 6 至 109 米处被观测到。这些地貌的当今海拔高度是通过高分辨率数字高程模型和实地测绘相结合确定的。利用 MATLAB 界面 TerraceM,我们对悬崖和平台表面进行了推断,以确定崖脚的海拔高度,在大多数情况下,崖脚被掩埋在数米高的滑石之下。我们根据冰川等静力调整校正了峭壁趾的海拔高度,发现仅凭这一过程无法解释观测到的全球各地上新世古海岸线海拔高度的差异。接下来,我们确定了与地幔动态地形相关的信号,方法是反演地幔现今的三维浮力结构,并使用对流代码 ASPECT 计算过去 3 Myr 的径向地表应力差异。我们将地震层析成像模型、地球动力学观测和岩石力学实验室实验所约束的各种现今地幔结构(浮力和粘度)包括在内。最后,我们根据动态地形变化预测与疤痕海拔高度的一致性,确定了首选的动态地形变化预测,并根据南非德霍普的一个疤痕海拔高度,利用最可靠的结果估算了上新世的全球平均海平面。这一推断(11.6 ± 5.2 米)是向下修正的,可能意味着冰原对温暖的上新世气候条件具有较强的抵抗力。不过,我们也得出结论,要根据本研究绘制的所有疤痕更可靠地推断上新世中期的全球平均海平面,还需要开发更有针对性的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pliocene shorelines and the epeirogenic motion of continental margins: A target dataset for dynamic topography models
Abstract. Global mean sea level during the mid-Pliocene Epoch (~3 Ma), when CO2 and temperatures were above present levels, was notably higher than today due to reduced global ice sheet coverage. Nevertheless, the extent to which ice sheets responded to Pliocene warmth remains in question, owing to high levels of uncertainty in proxy-based sea-level reconstructions as well as solid Earth dynamic models that have been used to evaluate a limited number of data constraints. Here, we present a global dataset of ten wavecut scarps that formed by successive Pliocene sea-level oscillations and which are observed today at elevations ranging from ~6 to 109 m above sea level. The present-day elevations of these features have been identified using a combination of high-resolution digital elevation models and field mapping. Using the MATLAB interface TerraceM, we extrapolate the cliff and platform surfaces to determine the elevation of the scarp toe, which in most settings is buried under meters of talus. We correct the scarp-toe elevations for glacial isostatic adjustment and find that this process alone cannot explain observed differences in Pliocene paleoshoreline elevations around the globe. We next determine the signal associated with mantle dynamic topography by back-advecting the present-day three-dimensional buoyancy structure of the mantle and calculating the difference in radial surface stresses over the last 3 Myr using the convection code ASPECT. We include a wide range of present-day mantle structures (buoyancy and viscosity) constrained by seismic tomography models, geodynamic observations, and rock mechanics laboratory experiments. Finally, we identify preferred dynamic topography change predictions based on their agreement with scarp elevations and use our most confident result to estimate a Pliocene global mean sea level based on one scarp from De Hoop, South Africa. This inference (11.6 ± 5.2 m) is a downward revision and may imply ice sheets were relatively resistant to warm Pliocene climate conditions. We also conclude, however, that more targeted model development is needed to more reliably infer mid-Pliocene global mean sea level based on all scarps mapped in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Surface Dynamics
Earth Surface Dynamics GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICALGEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCI-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
56
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Earth Surface Dynamics (ESurf) is an international scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of high-quality research on the physical, chemical, and biological processes shaping Earth''s surface and their interactions on all scales.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信