不止一种方式:五年级学生不同的数字阅读行为和理解结果

IF 3.5 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu, Michael Havazelet, Amanda P. Goodwin
{"title":"不止一种方式:五年级学生不同的数字阅读行为和理解结果","authors":"Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu, Michael Havazelet, Amanda P. Goodwin","doi":"10.1177/23328584241226633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital reading is ubiquitous, yet understanding digital reading processes and links to comprehension remains underdeveloped. Guided by new literacies and active reading theories, this study explored the reading behaviors and comprehension of thirteen fifth graders who read static digital texts. We coded for the quantity and quality of digital reading behaviors and employed action path diagrams to connect behaviors to comprehension. We used timescape analyses to visualize how behaviors were orchestrated differently across readers. Findings showed no single behavior was related directly to comprehension, indicating varying pathways to digital reading success. Occasional rereading seemed to support active reading and improved comprehension. Instances of students subverting expected digital tools were observed. Minor distractions like mind-wandering did not link to poor performance. This research deepens our understanding of self-monitoring and active reading in static digital contexts, offering insights for future study of more complex digital reading contexts like reading on the internet.","PeriodicalId":31132,"journal":{"name":"Aera Open","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Than One Way: Fifth-Graders’ Varied Digital Reading Behaviors and Comprehension Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Yoshiko Shimizu, Michael Havazelet, Amanda P. Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23328584241226633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital reading is ubiquitous, yet understanding digital reading processes and links to comprehension remains underdeveloped. Guided by new literacies and active reading theories, this study explored the reading behaviors and comprehension of thirteen fifth graders who read static digital texts. We coded for the quantity and quality of digital reading behaviors and employed action path diagrams to connect behaviors to comprehension. We used timescape analyses to visualize how behaviors were orchestrated differently across readers. Findings showed no single behavior was related directly to comprehension, indicating varying pathways to digital reading success. Occasional rereading seemed to support active reading and improved comprehension. Instances of students subverting expected digital tools were observed. Minor distractions like mind-wandering did not link to poor performance. This research deepens our understanding of self-monitoring and active reading in static digital contexts, offering insights for future study of more complex digital reading contexts like reading on the internet.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aera Open\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aera Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241226633\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aera Open","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241226633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字阅读无处不在,但人们对数字阅读过程及其与理解能力之间联系的了解仍然不足。本研究以新文学和主动阅读理论为指导,探讨了 13 名五年级学生阅读静态数字文本的阅读行为和理解能力。我们对数字阅读行为的数量和质量进行了编码,并采用行动路径图将行为与理解联系起来。我们利用时景分析来直观地展示不同读者的不同阅读行为。研究结果表明,没有任何一种行为与理解能力直接相关,这表明数字阅读成功的途径各不相同。偶尔重读似乎有助于积极阅读和提高理解能力。我们还观察到学生颠覆预期数字工具的情况。轻微的分心行为,如胡思乱想,与成绩不佳并无关联。这项研究加深了我们对静态数字情境中自我监控和主动阅读的理解,为今后研究更复杂的数字阅读情境(如互联网阅读)提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More Than One Way: Fifth-Graders’ Varied Digital Reading Behaviors and Comprehension Outcomes
Digital reading is ubiquitous, yet understanding digital reading processes and links to comprehension remains underdeveloped. Guided by new literacies and active reading theories, this study explored the reading behaviors and comprehension of thirteen fifth graders who read static digital texts. We coded for the quantity and quality of digital reading behaviors and employed action path diagrams to connect behaviors to comprehension. We used timescape analyses to visualize how behaviors were orchestrated differently across readers. Findings showed no single behavior was related directly to comprehension, indicating varying pathways to digital reading success. Occasional rereading seemed to support active reading and improved comprehension. Instances of students subverting expected digital tools were observed. Minor distractions like mind-wandering did not link to poor performance. This research deepens our understanding of self-monitoring and active reading in static digital contexts, offering insights for future study of more complex digital reading contexts like reading on the internet.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aera Open
Aera Open EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
60
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信