Efendi Zaenudin, Ezra B. Wijaya, Venugopala Reddy Mekala, Ka-Lok Ng
{"title":"基于网络子图的方法:分子网络分析的无对齐技术","authors":"Efendi Zaenudin, Ezra B. Wijaya, Venugopala Reddy Mekala, Ka-Lok Ng","doi":"10.2174/0115748936285057240126062220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We propose a novel method to compare directed networks by decomposing the network into small modules, the so-called network subgraph approach, which is distinct from the network motif approach because it does not depend on null model assumptions. Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Results:: We identified and examined the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks with the smallest HJS values. The two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some studies have provided experimental data supporting the 5-node regulatory modules. result: We identify and examine the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks which have the smallest HJS values. These two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some literature studies provide experimental data to support the 5-node regulatory modules. Conclusion: Our method is an alignment-free approach that measures the topological similarity of 5-node regulatory modules and aligns two directed networks based on their topology. These modules capture complex interactions among multiple genes that cannot be detected using existing methods that only consider single-gene relations. We analyzed the biological relevance of the regulatory modules and used the subgraph method to identify the modules that shared the same topology across 2 cancer networks out of 17 cancer networks. We validated our findings using evidence from the literature.","PeriodicalId":10801,"journal":{"name":"Current Bioinformatics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Network Subgraph-based Method: Alignment-free Technique for Molecular Network Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Efendi Zaenudin, Ezra B. Wijaya, Venugopala Reddy Mekala, Ka-Lok Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115748936285057240126062220\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: We propose a novel method to compare directed networks by decomposing the network into small modules, the so-called network subgraph approach, which is distinct from the network motif approach because it does not depend on null model assumptions. Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Results:: We identified and examined the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks with the smallest HJS values. The two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some studies have provided experimental data supporting the 5-node regulatory modules. result: We identify and examine the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks which have the smallest HJS values. These two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some literature studies provide experimental data to support the 5-node regulatory modules. Conclusion: Our method is an alignment-free approach that measures the topological similarity of 5-node regulatory modules and aligns two directed networks based on their topology. These modules capture complex interactions among multiple genes that cannot be detected using existing methods that only consider single-gene relations. We analyzed the biological relevance of the regulatory modules and used the subgraph method to identify the modules that shared the same topology across 2 cancer networks out of 17 cancer networks. We validated our findings using evidence from the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Bioinformatics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Bioinformatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748936285057240126062220\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Bioinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748936285057240126062220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Network Subgraph-based Method: Alignment-free Technique for Molecular Network Analysis
Objective: We propose a novel method to compare directed networks by decomposing the network into small modules, the so-called network subgraph approach, which is distinct from the network motif approach because it does not depend on null model assumptions. Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Method: We developed an alignment-free algorithm called the Subgraph Identification Algorithm (SIA), which could generate all subgraphs that have five connected nodes (5-node subgraph). There were 9,364 such modules. Then, we applied the SIA method to examine 17 cancer networks and measured the similarity between the two networks by gauging the similarity level using Jensen- Shannon entropy (HJS). Results:: We identified and examined the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks with the smallest HJS values. The two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some studies have provided experimental data supporting the 5-node regulatory modules. result: We identify and examine the biological meaning of 5-node regulatory modules and pairs of cancer networks which have the smallest HJS values. These two pairs of networks that show similar patterns are (i) endometrial cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma, and (ii) breast cancer and pathways in cancer. Some literature studies provide experimental data to support the 5-node regulatory modules. Conclusion: Our method is an alignment-free approach that measures the topological similarity of 5-node regulatory modules and aligns two directed networks based on their topology. These modules capture complex interactions among multiple genes that cannot be detected using existing methods that only consider single-gene relations. We analyzed the biological relevance of the regulatory modules and used the subgraph method to identify the modules that shared the same topology across 2 cancer networks out of 17 cancer networks. We validated our findings using evidence from the literature.
期刊介绍:
Current Bioinformatics aims to publish all the latest and outstanding developments in bioinformatics. Each issue contains a series of timely, in-depth/mini-reviews, research papers and guest edited thematic issues written by leaders in the field, covering a wide range of the integration of biology with computer and information science.
The journal focuses on advances in computational molecular/structural biology, encompassing areas such as computing in biomedicine and genomics, computational proteomics and systems biology, and metabolic pathway engineering. Developments in these fields have direct implications on key issues related to health care, medicine, genetic disorders, development of agricultural products, renewable energy, environmental protection, etc.