院外心脏骤停的无人机自动体外除颤器。模拟研究。

Christopher Smith, Joseph Phillips, Carl Powell, Anthony Sheehan, Mary O Sullivan, Nigel Rees
{"title":"院外心脏骤停的无人机自动体外除颤器。模拟研究。","authors":"Christopher Smith, Joseph Phillips, Carl Powell, Anthony Sheehan, Mary O Sullivan, Nigel Rees","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.23.24303253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation at least doubles survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Members of the public can perform both before the ambulance service arrives. However, bystanders use a public-access Automated External Defibrillator (AED) in around 5% of cases. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (drones) to deliver AEDs may overcome many of the barriers preventing public-access AED use. We investigated how quickly and easily bystanders performing CPR could use drone-delivered AEDs. Methods: We developed an AED-capable drone between May and November 2020. In July and September 2021, we conducted eighteen out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations. A single participant found a simulated patient inside a building and made a 999-call to a Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust call-handler. Once cardiac arrest was confirmed during the 999-call a nearby drone launched, reached hovering altitude and delivered the AED immediately outside the building. The participant retrieved the AED when instructed to do so, attached it to the patient and delivered a single shock. The primary outcome was hands-off CPR time. We investigated ease of AED retrieval via a questionnaire adapted from the System Usability Scale and explored participant behaviours via brief post-simulation interviews and reviews of audio (999-call) and video recordings of the simulation. Results: Hands-off CPR time was (median) 109s (interquartile range 87-130s). Participants spent 19s (16-22s) away from the patients side when retrieving the AED. They found it easy to use the AED but often sought reassurance from the call-handler that it was appropriate for them to retrieve it. Conclusion: Participants found it easy to retrieve and use an AED delivered by drone in simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Hands-off CPR time was potentially clinically relevant in this lone bystander simulation, but there was only a small increase in hands-off time caused by retrieval of the drone-delivered AED.","PeriodicalId":501290,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","volume":"196 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drone-delivered Automated External Defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A simulation study.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Smith, Joseph Phillips, Carl Powell, Anthony Sheehan, Mary O Sullivan, Nigel Rees\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.02.23.24303253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation at least doubles survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Members of the public can perform both before the ambulance service arrives. However, bystanders use a public-access Automated External Defibrillator (AED) in around 5% of cases. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (drones) to deliver AEDs may overcome many of the barriers preventing public-access AED use. We investigated how quickly and easily bystanders performing CPR could use drone-delivered AEDs. Methods: We developed an AED-capable drone between May and November 2020. In July and September 2021, we conducted eighteen out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations. A single participant found a simulated patient inside a building and made a 999-call to a Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust call-handler. Once cardiac arrest was confirmed during the 999-call a nearby drone launched, reached hovering altitude and delivered the AED immediately outside the building. The participant retrieved the AED when instructed to do so, attached it to the patient and delivered a single shock. The primary outcome was hands-off CPR time. We investigated ease of AED retrieval via a questionnaire adapted from the System Usability Scale and explored participant behaviours via brief post-simulation interviews and reviews of audio (999-call) and video recordings of the simulation. Results: Hands-off CPR time was (median) 109s (interquartile range 87-130s). Participants spent 19s (16-22s) away from the patients side when retrieving the AED. They found it easy to use the AED but often sought reassurance from the call-handler that it was appropriate for them to retrieve it. Conclusion: Participants found it easy to retrieve and use an AED delivered by drone in simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Hands-off CPR time was potentially clinically relevant in this lone bystander simulation, but there was only a small increase in hands-off time caused by retrieval of the drone-delivered AED.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"196 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.23.24303253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.23.24303253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:院外心脏骤停患者出院后,心肺复苏术(CPR)和除颤术至少可将存活率提高一倍。公众可以在救护车到达之前进行这两项操作。然而,旁观者使用公共场所的自动体外除颤器(AED)的比例约为 5%。使用无人驾驶飞行器(无人机)运送自动体外除颤器(AED)可能会克服许多阻碍公众使用自动体外除颤器(AED)的障碍。我们研究了旁观者在进行心肺复苏时如何快速、轻松地使用无人机投放的自动体外除颤器。方法:我们在 2020 年 5 月至 11 月期间开发了一款具备 AED 功能的无人机。2021 年 7 月至 9 月,我们进行了 18 次院外心脏骤停模拟。一名参与者在一栋建筑物内发现了一名模拟病人,并向威尔士救护服务 NHS 信托基金会的呼叫处理人员拨打了 999 电话。一旦在 999 呼叫中确认心脏骤停,附近的无人机就会发射,到达悬停高度后立即将自动体外除颤器送到大楼外。参与者按照指示取回自动体外除颤器,将其连接到患者身上并进行一次电击。主要结果是徒手心肺复苏时间。我们通过改编自系统可用性量表的问卷调查了自动体外除颤器的检索难易程度,并通过模拟后的简短访谈和对模拟音频(999 呼叫)和视频记录的审查探讨了参与者的行为。模拟结果徒手心肺复苏时间(中位数)为 109 秒(四分位数间距为 87-130 秒)。参与者在取回自动体外除颤器时离开患者身边的时间为 19 秒(16-22 秒)。他们认为使用自动体外除颤器很容易,但经常要求呼叫处理人员再次保证由他们取回自动体外除颤器是合适的。结论:在模拟院外心脏骤停的情况下,参与者发现取回和使用由无人机提供的自动体外除颤器非常容易。在这种孤身旁观的模拟中,徒手心肺复苏时间可能与临床相关,但取回无人机投放的自动体外除颤器仅导致徒手时间略有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drone-delivered Automated External Defibrillators for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A simulation study.
Background: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation at least doubles survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Members of the public can perform both before the ambulance service arrives. However, bystanders use a public-access Automated External Defibrillator (AED) in around 5% of cases. Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (drones) to deliver AEDs may overcome many of the barriers preventing public-access AED use. We investigated how quickly and easily bystanders performing CPR could use drone-delivered AEDs. Methods: We developed an AED-capable drone between May and November 2020. In July and September 2021, we conducted eighteen out-of-hospital cardiac arrest simulations. A single participant found a simulated patient inside a building and made a 999-call to a Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust call-handler. Once cardiac arrest was confirmed during the 999-call a nearby drone launched, reached hovering altitude and delivered the AED immediately outside the building. The participant retrieved the AED when instructed to do so, attached it to the patient and delivered a single shock. The primary outcome was hands-off CPR time. We investigated ease of AED retrieval via a questionnaire adapted from the System Usability Scale and explored participant behaviours via brief post-simulation interviews and reviews of audio (999-call) and video recordings of the simulation. Results: Hands-off CPR time was (median) 109s (interquartile range 87-130s). Participants spent 19s (16-22s) away from the patients side when retrieving the AED. They found it easy to use the AED but often sought reassurance from the call-handler that it was appropriate for them to retrieve it. Conclusion: Participants found it easy to retrieve and use an AED delivered by drone in simulated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. Hands-off CPR time was potentially clinically relevant in this lone bystander simulation, but there was only a small increase in hands-off time caused by retrieval of the drone-delivered AED.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信