Aracely Burgos-Ayala , Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno , Megan Meacham , Daniel Rozas-Vásquez , María Mancilla García , Juan Rocha , Alexander Rincón-Ruíz
{"title":"绘制哥伦比亚的生态系统服务图:环境管理中的协同作用、权衡和捆绑分析","authors":"Aracely Burgos-Ayala , Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno , Megan Meacham , Daniel Rozas-Vásquez , María Mancilla García , Juan Rocha , Alexander Rincón-Ruíz","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecosystem services (ES) have gained significant attention in recent years from the global environmental initiatives that involve science and policy. Multiple scholars have analyzed how ES are integrated with environmental policies, plans, and strategic assessments. However, there is a lack of information on how countries translate these policies, plans and assessments into concrete environmental management actions that integrate an explicit ES approach. To help fill this gap, we analyze how the Colombian Regional Autonomous Corporations (CARs) have used the ES approach in their environmental management projects implemented between 2004 and 2015. This study aims to analyze the type and diversity of ES managed by the CARs, as well as the synergies, trade-offs, and bundles of ES prioritized by them. We used content analysis of the CARs reports and statistical analysis to explore whether CARs explicitly use the ES concept. Our results showed that provisioning, regulating, and cultural ES were similarly prioritized by the CARs, however, explicit mention of ES was limited. Regulating services showed remarkable potential for synergies, and there was a pattern of trade-offs between cultural and some regulating and provisioning services. We found three bundles of ES: “Restoration and conservation of agrosystems”, “Mosaic of services” and “Farming and fibers” occupying, respectively, 9, 36 and 55% of the total area of Colombia. Our findings show that multiple ES are targeted and affected by environmental management actions.</p><p>The contribution of this study has the potential to inform adequately policy decisions to be used in environmental management and planning practices to prioritize areas for maximizing ES provision.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101608"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping ecosystem services in Colombia: Analysis of synergies, trade-offs and bundles in environmental management\",\"authors\":\"Aracely Burgos-Ayala , Amanda Jiménez-Aceituno , Megan Meacham , Daniel Rozas-Vásquez , María Mancilla García , Juan Rocha , Alexander Rincón-Ruíz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecosystem services (ES) have gained significant attention in recent years from the global environmental initiatives that involve science and policy. Multiple scholars have analyzed how ES are integrated with environmental policies, plans, and strategic assessments. However, there is a lack of information on how countries translate these policies, plans and assessments into concrete environmental management actions that integrate an explicit ES approach. To help fill this gap, we analyze how the Colombian Regional Autonomous Corporations (CARs) have used the ES approach in their environmental management projects implemented between 2004 and 2015. This study aims to analyze the type and diversity of ES managed by the CARs, as well as the synergies, trade-offs, and bundles of ES prioritized by them. We used content analysis of the CARs reports and statistical analysis to explore whether CARs explicitly use the ES concept. Our results showed that provisioning, regulating, and cultural ES were similarly prioritized by the CARs, however, explicit mention of ES was limited. Regulating services showed remarkable potential for synergies, and there was a pattern of trade-offs between cultural and some regulating and provisioning services. We found three bundles of ES: “Restoration and conservation of agrosystems”, “Mosaic of services” and “Farming and fibers” occupying, respectively, 9, 36 and 55% of the total area of Colombia. Our findings show that multiple ES are targeted and affected by environmental management actions.</p><p>The contribution of this study has the potential to inform adequately policy decisions to be used in environmental management and planning practices to prioritize areas for maximizing ES provision.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecosystem Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000147\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041624000147","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来,生态系统服务(ES)在涉及科学和政策的全球环境倡议中获得了极大关注。多位学者分析了如何将生态系统服务与环境政策、计划和战略评估相结合。然而,关于各国如何将这些政策、计划和评估转化为具体的环境管理行动,并将明确的生态系统服务方法融入其中,目前还缺乏相关信息。为了填补这一空白,我们分析了哥伦比亚地区自治公司(CAR)在 2004 年至 2015 年间实施的环境管理项目中如何使用环境管理方法。本研究旨在分析哥伦比亚地区自治公司管理的环境系统的类型和多样性,以及它们优先考虑的环境系统的协同作用、权衡和捆绑。我们通过对报告的内容分析和统计分析来探讨 CAR 是否明确使用了 ES 概念。结果表明,各 CAR 同样将提供、调节和文化 ES 放在优先位置,但明确提及 ES 的情况有限。监管服务显示出显著的协同增效潜力,而文化服务与某些监管服务和供应服务之间存在权衡模式。我们发现了三组生态系统服务:"农业系统的恢复和保护"、"综合服务 "以及 "农业和纤维",分别占哥伦比亚总面积的 9%、36% 和 55%。我们的研究结果表明,环境管理行动以多种生态系统为目标,并对其产生影响。这项研究的贡献有可能为环境管理和规划实践中的政策决定提供充分的信息,以确定优先区域,最大限度地提供生态系统服务。
Mapping ecosystem services in Colombia: Analysis of synergies, trade-offs and bundles in environmental management
Ecosystem services (ES) have gained significant attention in recent years from the global environmental initiatives that involve science and policy. Multiple scholars have analyzed how ES are integrated with environmental policies, plans, and strategic assessments. However, there is a lack of information on how countries translate these policies, plans and assessments into concrete environmental management actions that integrate an explicit ES approach. To help fill this gap, we analyze how the Colombian Regional Autonomous Corporations (CARs) have used the ES approach in their environmental management projects implemented between 2004 and 2015. This study aims to analyze the type and diversity of ES managed by the CARs, as well as the synergies, trade-offs, and bundles of ES prioritized by them. We used content analysis of the CARs reports and statistical analysis to explore whether CARs explicitly use the ES concept. Our results showed that provisioning, regulating, and cultural ES were similarly prioritized by the CARs, however, explicit mention of ES was limited. Regulating services showed remarkable potential for synergies, and there was a pattern of trade-offs between cultural and some regulating and provisioning services. We found three bundles of ES: “Restoration and conservation of agrosystems”, “Mosaic of services” and “Farming and fibers” occupying, respectively, 9, 36 and 55% of the total area of Colombia. Our findings show that multiple ES are targeted and affected by environmental management actions.
The contribution of this study has the potential to inform adequately policy decisions to be used in environmental management and planning practices to prioritize areas for maximizing ES provision.
期刊介绍:
Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly.
Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.