Leanne Tyson, Jane Skinner, Bhairavi Hariharan, Benz Josiah, Kaobimdi Okongwu, Joanna Semlyen
{"title":"直面医学中的歧视:旁观者干预培训的影响。","authors":"Leanne Tyson, Jane Skinner, Bhairavi Hariharan, Benz Josiah, Kaobimdi Okongwu, Joanna Semlyen","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2316849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A mixed-methods study to evaluate <i>Bystander Intervention Training</i> (BiT), a simulation-based small-group training programme designed to teach skills to tackle discrimination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Norwich Medical School delivered the intervention online between January 2020 and June 2023 to medical students, physician associate trainees, and qualified doctors. A sample of 569 participants was used in the main analysis. Participants completed pre- and post-training and follow-up evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired post-training scores were significantly different (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) from the pre-training scores for all 12 questions, in favour of the post-training scores. Of the 159 participants who completed follow-up questionnaires, 27 (17.9%) reported having the opportunity to be an active bystander; of those, 23 (85%) intervened. Scores in the follow-up questionnaire were significantly higher than those in the pre-training survey and significantly lower than those in the post-training questionnaire (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Participants had an increased sense of responsibility to be an active bystander and were empowered to challenge discrimination. Participants from marginalised groups expressed positive views about the training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions that allow open discussion and carefully supported personal disclosure in safe spaces, where difficult and uncomfortable discussions can occur, with an opportunity to change behaviour, must be developed to tackle discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"73-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tackling discrimination in medicine head on: The impact of bystander intervention training.\",\"authors\":\"Leanne Tyson, Jane Skinner, Bhairavi Hariharan, Benz Josiah, Kaobimdi Okongwu, Joanna Semlyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2316849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A mixed-methods study to evaluate <i>Bystander Intervention Training</i> (BiT), a simulation-based small-group training programme designed to teach skills to tackle discrimination.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Norwich Medical School delivered the intervention online between January 2020 and June 2023 to medical students, physician associate trainees, and qualified doctors. A sample of 569 participants was used in the main analysis. Participants completed pre- and post-training and follow-up evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired post-training scores were significantly different (all <i>p</i> < 0.001) from the pre-training scores for all 12 questions, in favour of the post-training scores. Of the 159 participants who completed follow-up questionnaires, 27 (17.9%) reported having the opportunity to be an active bystander; of those, 23 (85%) intervened. Scores in the follow-up questionnaire were significantly higher than those in the pre-training survey and significantly lower than those in the post-training questionnaire (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Participants had an increased sense of responsibility to be an active bystander and were empowered to challenge discrimination. Participants from marginalised groups expressed positive views about the training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions that allow open discussion and carefully supported personal disclosure in safe spaces, where difficult and uncomfortable discussions can occur, with an opportunity to change behaviour, must be developed to tackle discrimination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"73-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2316849\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2316849","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:采用混合方法对旁观者干预培训(BiT)进行评估,这是一项基于模拟的小组培训项目,旨在传授应对歧视的技能:诺里奇医学院在 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月期间通过网络向医科学生、副实习医生和合格医生提供干预训练。主要分析使用了 569 个参与者样本。参与者完成了培训前、培训后和后续评估:结果:培训后的配对得分存在显著差异(均为 p p 结论:培训后的得分与培训前的得分存在显著差异:为解决歧视问题,必须制定干预措施,允许在安全的空间内进行公开讨论和谨慎支持的个人披露,在安全的空间内可以进行困难和不舒服的讨论,并有机会改变行为。
Tackling discrimination in medicine head on: The impact of bystander intervention training.
Purpose: A mixed-methods study to evaluate Bystander Intervention Training (BiT), a simulation-based small-group training programme designed to teach skills to tackle discrimination.
Materials and methods: Norwich Medical School delivered the intervention online between January 2020 and June 2023 to medical students, physician associate trainees, and qualified doctors. A sample of 569 participants was used in the main analysis. Participants completed pre- and post-training and follow-up evaluations.
Results: Paired post-training scores were significantly different (all p < 0.001) from the pre-training scores for all 12 questions, in favour of the post-training scores. Of the 159 participants who completed follow-up questionnaires, 27 (17.9%) reported having the opportunity to be an active bystander; of those, 23 (85%) intervened. Scores in the follow-up questionnaire were significantly higher than those in the pre-training survey and significantly lower than those in the post-training questionnaire (p < 0.001). Participants had an increased sense of responsibility to be an active bystander and were empowered to challenge discrimination. Participants from marginalised groups expressed positive views about the training.
Conclusions: Interventions that allow open discussion and carefully supported personal disclosure in safe spaces, where difficult and uncomfortable discussions can occur, with an opportunity to change behaviour, must be developed to tackle discrimination.
期刊介绍:
Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.