Muireann O Shea, Bridget Kiely, Patrick O'Donnell, Susan M Smith
{"title":"对爱尔兰全科医生社会贫困实践补助金的评估。","authors":"Muireann O Shea, Bridget Kiely, Patrick O'Donnell, Susan M Smith","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inverse care law states that availability of good medical care varies inversely with the need for it in the population served. In 2019, the main medical union and the Department of Health in the Republic of Ireland (RoI), agreed on funding a social deprivation practice grant for general practices in urban deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the implementation and impact of the social deprivation practice grant in participating general practices.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A mixed-methods study with sequential design based in Irish general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected using a questionnaire and online semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff. Data were analysed separately, and the findings compared to examine the extent to which they converged or diverged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 survey responses and nine interviews. All practices reported the grant was beneficial and most practices utilised the grant to fund additional doctor hours (17/25). Both surveys and interviews indicated that a small amount of additional funding allowed additional clinical need in areas of deprivation to be addressed, but there were some barriers identified in accessing the grant and implementing planned expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivery of health care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation presents significant challenges. While there were some problems with implementation, the introduction of a small, targeted grant for general practices in areas of social deprivation allowed those practices to enhance their services, with tailored initiatives seeking to meet the needs of their patient populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An evaluation of the social deprivation practice grant in Irish general practice.\",\"authors\":\"Muireann O Shea, Bridget Kiely, Patrick O'Donnell, Susan M Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inverse care law states that availability of good medical care varies inversely with the need for it in the population served. In 2019, the main medical union and the Department of Health in the Republic of Ireland (RoI), agreed on funding a social deprivation practice grant for general practices in urban deprived areas.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the implementation and impact of the social deprivation practice grant in participating general practices.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A mixed-methods study with sequential design based in Irish general practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected using a questionnaire and online semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff. Data were analysed separately, and the findings compared to examine the extent to which they converged or diverged.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 survey responses and nine interviews. All practices reported the grant was beneficial and most practices utilised the grant to fund additional doctor hours (17/25). Both surveys and interviews indicated that a small amount of additional funding allowed additional clinical need in areas of deprivation to be addressed, but there were some barriers identified in accessing the grant and implementing planned expenditure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Delivery of health care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation presents significant challenges. While there were some problems with implementation, the introduction of a small, targeted grant for general practices in areas of social deprivation allowed those practices to enhance their services, with tailored initiatives seeking to meet the needs of their patient populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11300971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
An evaluation of the social deprivation practice grant in Irish general practice.
Background: The inverse care law states that availability of good medical care varies inversely with the need for it in the population served. In 2019, the main medical union and the Department of Health in the Republic of Ireland (RoI), agreed on funding a social deprivation practice grant for general practices in urban deprived areas.
Aim: To examine the implementation and impact of the social deprivation practice grant in participating general practices.
Design & setting: A mixed-methods study with sequential design based in Irish general practice.
Method: Data were collected using a questionnaire and online semi-structured interviews with GPs and practice staff. Data were analysed separately, and the findings compared to examine the extent to which they converged or diverged.
Results: There were 25 survey responses and nine interviews. All practices reported the grant was beneficial and most practices utilised the grant to fund additional doctor hours (17/25). Both surveys and interviews indicated that a small amount of additional funding allowed additional clinical need in areas of deprivation to be addressed, but there were some barriers identified in accessing the grant and implementing planned expenditure.
Conclusion: Delivery of health care in areas of socioeconomic deprivation presents significant challenges. While there were some problems with implementation, the introduction of a small, targeted grant for general practices in areas of social deprivation allowed those practices to enhance their services, with tailored initiatives seeking to meet the needs of their patient populations.