真实世界数据中 TIPS 加肝外旁路栓塞的疗效:一项验证研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Lianhui Zhao, Jun Tie, Guangchuan Wang, Zhengjie Li, Jiao Xu, Yuzheng Zhuge, Feng Zhang, Hao Wu, Bo Wei, Hui Xue, Peijie Li, Wei Wu, Chao Chen, Qiong Wu, Yifu Xia, Xiubin Sun, Chunqing Zhang
{"title":"真实世界数据中 TIPS 加肝外旁路栓塞的疗效:一项验证研究。","authors":"Lianhui Zhao, Jun Tie, Guangchuan Wang, Zhengjie Li, Jiao Xu, Yuzheng Zhuge, Feng Zhang, Hao Wu, Bo Wei, Hui Xue, Peijie Li, Wei Wu, Chao Chen, Qiong Wu, Yifu Xia, Xiubin Sun, Chunqing Zhang","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation (TIPS+E) in reducing rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) post-TIPS was recently reported in a meta-analysis, but further validation is essential. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of TIPS+E using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multicentre retrospective cohort included 2077 patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS±E (TIPS: 631, TIPS+E: 1446) between January 2010 and December 2022. Regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for baseline characteristic differences. After PSM, clinical outcomes, including rebleeding, HE, survival and further decompensation (FDC), were analysed. Baseline data from all patients contributed to the construction of prognostic models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 1136 matched patients (TIPS+E: TIPS=568:568) were included. TIPS+E demonstrated a significant reduction in rebleeding (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99; p=0.04), HE (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.99; p=0.04) and FDC (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; p=0.04), comparing to TIPS. Significantly, TIPS+E also reduced rebleeding, HE and FDC in subgroup of using 8 mm diameter stents and embolising of gastric varices+spontaneous portosystemic shunts (GV+SPSS). However, there were no differences in overall or subgroup survival analysis. Additionally, the random forest models showed higher accuracy and AUROC comparing to other models. Controlling post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (pPPG) within 7 mm Hg<pPPG<8.5 mm Hg improved prognosis, especially in TIPS+E group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our real-world data validation confirms the high efficacy of TIPS+E in reducing rebleeding and HE, particularly when using 8 mm diameter stents, embolising GV+SPSS and maintaining an optimal pPPG.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of TIPS plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation in real-world data: a validation study.\",\"authors\":\"Lianhui Zhao, Jun Tie, Guangchuan Wang, Zhengjie Li, Jiao Xu, Yuzheng Zhuge, Feng Zhang, Hao Wu, Bo Wei, Hui Xue, Peijie Li, Wei Wu, Chao Chen, Qiong Wu, Yifu Xia, Xiubin Sun, Chunqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation (TIPS+E) in reducing rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) post-TIPS was recently reported in a meta-analysis, but further validation is essential. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of TIPS+E using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The multicentre retrospective cohort included 2077 patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS±E (TIPS: 631, TIPS+E: 1446) between January 2010 and December 2022. Regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for baseline characteristic differences. After PSM, clinical outcomes, including rebleeding, HE, survival and further decompensation (FDC), were analysed. Baseline data from all patients contributed to the construction of prognostic models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 1136 matched patients (TIPS+E: TIPS=568:568) were included. TIPS+E demonstrated a significant reduction in rebleeding (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99; p=0.04), HE (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.99; p=0.04) and FDC (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; p=0.04), comparing to TIPS. Significantly, TIPS+E also reduced rebleeding, HE and FDC in subgroup of using 8 mm diameter stents and embolising of gastric varices+spontaneous portosystemic shunts (GV+SPSS). However, there were no differences in overall or subgroup survival analysis. Additionally, the random forest models showed higher accuracy and AUROC comparing to other models. Controlling post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (pPPG) within 7 mm Hg<pPPG<8.5 mm Hg improved prognosis, especially in TIPS+E group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our real-world data validation confirms the high efficacy of TIPS+E in reducing rebleeding and HE, particularly when using 8 mm diameter stents, embolising GV+SPSS and maintaining an optimal pPPG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10895241/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的最近一项荟萃分析报告了经颈静脉肝内门体系统分流术(TIPS)加肝外副栓塞术(TIPS+E)在减少TIPS术后再出血和肝性脑病(HE)方面的疗效,但进一步的验证至关重要。本研究旨在利用真实世界的数据证实 TIPS+E 的有效性:多中心回顾性队列包括2010年1月至2022年12月期间接受TIPS±E治疗的2077例肝硬化患者(TIPS:631例,TIPS+E:1446例)。采用回归和倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整基线特征差异。经过倾向得分匹配后,对包括再出血、高血压、存活率和进一步失代偿(FDC)在内的临床结果进行了分析。所有患者的基线数据都有助于构建预后模型:结果:经过 PSM,共纳入了 1136 例匹配患者(TIPS+E:TIPS=568:568)。与 TIPS 相比,TIPS+E 能显著减少再出血(HR 0.77;95% CI 0.59 至 0.99;P=0.04)、HE(HR 0.82;95% CI 0.68 至 0.99;P=0.04)和 FDC(HR 0.85;95% CI 0.73 至 0.99;P=0.04)。在使用直径 8 毫米支架和栓塞胃静脉曲张+自发性门静脉分流术(GV+SPSS)的亚组中,TIPS+E 也显著减少了再出血、HE 和 FDC。然而,总体或亚组生存率分析没有差异。此外,与其他模型相比,随机森林模型显示出更高的准确性和AUROC。将 TIPS 术后门静脉压力阶差(pPPG)控制在 7 毫米汞柱以内:我们的真实世界数据验证证实了 TIPS+E 在减少再出血和 HE 方面的高效性,尤其是在使用直径 8 毫米的支架、栓塞 GV+SPSS 并保持最佳 pPPG 的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of TIPS plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation in real-world data: a validation study.

Objectives: The efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation (TIPS+E) in reducing rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) post-TIPS was recently reported in a meta-analysis, but further validation is essential. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of TIPS+E using real-world data.

Methods: The multicentre retrospective cohort included 2077 patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS±E (TIPS: 631, TIPS+E: 1446) between January 2010 and December 2022. Regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for baseline characteristic differences. After PSM, clinical outcomes, including rebleeding, HE, survival and further decompensation (FDC), were analysed. Baseline data from all patients contributed to the construction of prognostic models.

Results: After PSM, 1136 matched patients (TIPS+E: TIPS=568:568) were included. TIPS+E demonstrated a significant reduction in rebleeding (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99; p=0.04), HE (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.99; p=0.04) and FDC (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; p=0.04), comparing to TIPS. Significantly, TIPS+E also reduced rebleeding, HE and FDC in subgroup of using 8 mm diameter stents and embolising of gastric varices+spontaneous portosystemic shunts (GV+SPSS). However, there were no differences in overall or subgroup survival analysis. Additionally, the random forest models showed higher accuracy and AUROC comparing to other models. Controlling post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (pPPG) within 7 mm Hg

Conclusion: Our real-world data validation confirms the high efficacy of TIPS+E in reducing rebleeding and HE, particularly when using 8 mm diameter stents, embolising GV+SPSS and maintaining an optimal pPPG.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信