对麻风病进行活体证据分析的方法:文献证据图

Kusala Pussegoda, Tricia Corrin, Austyn Baumeister, Dima Ayache, Lisa Waddell
{"title":"对麻风病进行活体证据分析的方法:文献证据图","authors":"Kusala Pussegoda,&nbsp;Tricia Corrin,&nbsp;Austyn Baumeister,&nbsp;Dima Ayache,&nbsp;Lisa Waddell","doi":"10.1002/cesm.12044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In May of 2022, several cases of mpox were identified in multiple nonendemic countries and on July 23, 2022 the World Health Organization declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. During the first six months of the outbreak there was an urgent need to have up-to-date synthesized evidence on mpox to inform public health decision-making. At this point, evidence is changing too quickly for traditional evidence synthesis methods, as systematic reviews were out-of-date before publication. This paper describes the framework developed to manage and maintain a living evidence profile (LEP) to systematically identify, classify and synthesize evidence on a broad range of mpox topics at a rapid pace as the outbreak unfolded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The LEP framework was based on principles of evidence synthesis, risk assessment, priority epidemiological parameters for infectious disease modeling and consultation with experts. The framework consisted of a systematic search conducted twice weekly; study selection; categorization into pre-determined foci and data extraction; integration and synthesis of evidence; internal peer-review and dissemination to stakeholders.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Between April 14 and December 15, 2022, 2287 citations were identified, 687 were primary research studies or surveillance reports on the 2022 mpox outbreak and 496 were included in the final LEP. Each study was mapped to one of 32 foci and evidence was narratively synthesized. From June to December 2022, 23 LEPs were produced (approximately weekly) along with a searchable database of extracted data of the mpox literature. They were disseminated globally to public health researchers and decision-makers to inform public health response efforts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The LEP framework is applicable to other public health emergencies when a rapid synthesis cycle is required because the evidence is evolving quickly. This efficient methodology for creating up-to-date summaries of the current evidence during the first few months of an outbreak or emergency supports public health decision-making and response activities.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100286,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","volume":"2 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.12044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: An evidence map of the literature\",\"authors\":\"Kusala Pussegoda,&nbsp;Tricia Corrin,&nbsp;Austyn Baumeister,&nbsp;Dima Ayache,&nbsp;Lisa Waddell\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cesm.12044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>In May of 2022, several cases of mpox were identified in multiple nonendemic countries and on July 23, 2022 the World Health Organization declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. During the first six months of the outbreak there was an urgent need to have up-to-date synthesized evidence on mpox to inform public health decision-making. At this point, evidence is changing too quickly for traditional evidence synthesis methods, as systematic reviews were out-of-date before publication. This paper describes the framework developed to manage and maintain a living evidence profile (LEP) to systematically identify, classify and synthesize evidence on a broad range of mpox topics at a rapid pace as the outbreak unfolded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The LEP framework was based on principles of evidence synthesis, risk assessment, priority epidemiological parameters for infectious disease modeling and consultation with experts. The framework consisted of a systematic search conducted twice weekly; study selection; categorization into pre-determined foci and data extraction; integration and synthesis of evidence; internal peer-review and dissemination to stakeholders.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Between April 14 and December 15, 2022, 2287 citations were identified, 687 were primary research studies or surveillance reports on the 2022 mpox outbreak and 496 were included in the final LEP. Each study was mapped to one of 32 foci and evidence was narratively synthesized. From June to December 2022, 23 LEPs were produced (approximately weekly) along with a searchable database of extracted data of the mpox literature. They were disseminated globally to public health researchers and decision-makers to inform public health response efforts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The LEP framework is applicable to other public health emergencies when a rapid synthesis cycle is required because the evidence is evolving quickly. This efficient methodology for creating up-to-date summaries of the current evidence during the first few months of an outbreak or emergency supports public health decision-making and response activities.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cesm.12044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.12044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cesm.12044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 2022 年 5 月,在多个非疫区国家发现了几例天花疫情,2022 年 7 月 23 日,世界卫生组织宣布天花为国际关注的突发公共卫生事件。在疫情爆发的头六个月里,迫切需要有关天花的最新综合证据为公共卫生决策提供依据。此时,由于证据变化太快,传统的证据综合方法无法满足需要,因为系统综述在发表之前就已经过时。本文介绍了为管理和维护 "活证据档案"(LEP)而开发的框架,以便随着疫情的迅速发展,系统地识别、分类和综合有关水痘的各种证据。 方法 活证据档案框架以证据综合、风险评估、传染病建模的优先流行病学参数和专家咨询等原则为基础。该框架包括每周两次的系统搜索、研究选择、按预先确定的重点进行分类和数据提取、证据整合与综合、内部同行评审以及向利益相关者传播。 结果 在 2022 年 4 月 14 日至 12 月 15 日期间,共确定了 2287 篇引文,其中 687 篇是关于 2022 年麻风腮疫情的主要研究或监测报告,496 篇被纳入最终的 LEP。每项研究都被映射到 32 个病灶之一,并对证据进行了叙述性综合。从 2022 年 6 月到 12 月,共编制了 23 份 LEP(大约每周一次),同时还建立了一个可搜索的麻痘文献数据提取数据库。这些资料在全球范围内传播给公共卫生研究人员和决策者,为公共卫生应对工作提供信息。 结论 LEP 框架适用于其他公共卫生突发事件,因为这些事件中的证据变化很快,需要快速的综合周期。这种高效的方法可在疫情爆发或紧急情况发生的最初几个月内创建最新的当前证据摘要,为公共卫生决策和应对活动提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: An evidence map of the literature

Methods for conducting a living evidence profile on mpox: An evidence map of the literature

Background

In May of 2022, several cases of mpox were identified in multiple nonendemic countries and on July 23, 2022 the World Health Organization declared mpox a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. During the first six months of the outbreak there was an urgent need to have up-to-date synthesized evidence on mpox to inform public health decision-making. At this point, evidence is changing too quickly for traditional evidence synthesis methods, as systematic reviews were out-of-date before publication. This paper describes the framework developed to manage and maintain a living evidence profile (LEP) to systematically identify, classify and synthesize evidence on a broad range of mpox topics at a rapid pace as the outbreak unfolded.

Methods

The LEP framework was based on principles of evidence synthesis, risk assessment, priority epidemiological parameters for infectious disease modeling and consultation with experts. The framework consisted of a systematic search conducted twice weekly; study selection; categorization into pre-determined foci and data extraction; integration and synthesis of evidence; internal peer-review and dissemination to stakeholders.

Results

Between April 14 and December 15, 2022, 2287 citations were identified, 687 were primary research studies or surveillance reports on the 2022 mpox outbreak and 496 were included in the final LEP. Each study was mapped to one of 32 foci and evidence was narratively synthesized. From June to December 2022, 23 LEPs were produced (approximately weekly) along with a searchable database of extracted data of the mpox literature. They were disseminated globally to public health researchers and decision-makers to inform public health response efforts.

Conclusions

The LEP framework is applicable to other public health emergencies when a rapid synthesis cycle is required because the evidence is evolving quickly. This efficient methodology for creating up-to-date summaries of the current evidence during the first few months of an outbreak or emergency supports public health decision-making and response activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信