获得高质量早期保育和教育的机会:澳大利亚全国综合数据分析

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Angelina Tang , Peter Rankin , Sally Staton , Karen Thorpe
{"title":"获得高质量早期保育和教育的机会:澳大利亚全国综合数据分析","authors":"Angelina Tang ,&nbsp;Peter Rankin ,&nbsp;Sally Staton ,&nbsp;Karen Thorpe","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (4.2) calls for all children to have access to <em>high quality</em> Early Childhood Education (ECE), recognising the potential of ECE to promote children's development and ongoing national prosperity. Yet, in marketized systems both structural features (availability and affordability of services) and social factors (family knowledge and social connection) can drive inequitable access to the highest quality provision. In the current study, we analyse data for <em>N</em>=77,113 children in Australia's new whole-population integrated database to ask: Who accesses <em>high-quality</em> ECE services? Australia's national quality rating of ECE services provided whole-of-country standard measurement of ECE quality. We find that, although Australia provides an income-scaled subsidy to families to enable ECE attendance, inequalities are seen in the quality of service accessed. Families experiencing socio-economic disadvantage and those living in regional and remote locations are under-represented in services rated high-quality. Recent immigrants, regardless of their economic status, are most likely to attend poorer quality services. These findings highlight the need to identify and remediate mechanisms preventing those most likely to benefit from the highest quality ECE from access. Such actions are critical to deliver on the promise of ECE to disrupt intergenerational disadvantage and enable sustainable national development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 352-362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000115/pdfft?md5=a9eed0158af0cf4ae08768ab17cef3d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0885200624000115-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to high-quality early care and education: Analysis of Australia's national integrated data\",\"authors\":\"Angelina Tang ,&nbsp;Peter Rankin ,&nbsp;Sally Staton ,&nbsp;Karen Thorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (4.2) calls for all children to have access to <em>high quality</em> Early Childhood Education (ECE), recognising the potential of ECE to promote children's development and ongoing national prosperity. Yet, in marketized systems both structural features (availability and affordability of services) and social factors (family knowledge and social connection) can drive inequitable access to the highest quality provision. In the current study, we analyse data for <em>N</em>=77,113 children in Australia's new whole-population integrated database to ask: Who accesses <em>high-quality</em> ECE services? Australia's national quality rating of ECE services provided whole-of-country standard measurement of ECE quality. We find that, although Australia provides an income-scaled subsidy to families to enable ECE attendance, inequalities are seen in the quality of service accessed. Families experiencing socio-economic disadvantage and those living in regional and remote locations are under-represented in services rated high-quality. Recent immigrants, regardless of their economic status, are most likely to attend poorer quality services. These findings highlight the need to identify and remediate mechanisms preventing those most likely to benefit from the highest quality ECE from access. Such actions are critical to deliver on the promise of ECE to disrupt intergenerational disadvantage and enable sustainable national development.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 352-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000115/pdfft?md5=a9eed0158af0cf4ae08768ab17cef3d9&pid=1-s2.0-S0885200624000115-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000115\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624000115","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

联合国可持续发展目标(4.2)呼吁所有儿童都能接受高质量的幼儿教育(ECE),承认幼儿教育在促进儿童发展和国家持续繁荣方面的潜力。然而,在市场化体系中,结构特征(服务的可获得性和可负担性)和社会因素(家庭知识和社会联系)都可能导致获得最高质量服务的机会不平等。在当前的研究中,我们分析了澳大利亚新的全人口综合数据库中 N=77,113 名儿童的数据,以探究:谁能获得高质量的幼儿教育服务?澳大利亚的全国幼儿教育服务质量评级提供了全国范围内的幼儿教育质量标准衡量。我们发现,尽管澳大利亚向家庭提供按收入比例计算的补贴,使其能够参加幼儿教育,但在获得服务质量方面却存在不平等现象。社会经济状况不佳的家庭以及生活在地区和偏远地区的家庭在被评为优质服务的家庭中所占比例较低。新移民,无论其经济状况如何,最有可能接受质量较差的服务。这些调查结果表明,有必要确定和纠正阻碍那些最有可能从最优质的幼儿教育中受益的人获得服务的机制。这些行动对于兑现幼儿教育的承诺,消除代际劣势和实现国家可持续发展至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access to high-quality early care and education: Analysis of Australia's national integrated data

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (4.2) calls for all children to have access to high quality Early Childhood Education (ECE), recognising the potential of ECE to promote children's development and ongoing national prosperity. Yet, in marketized systems both structural features (availability and affordability of services) and social factors (family knowledge and social connection) can drive inequitable access to the highest quality provision. In the current study, we analyse data for N=77,113 children in Australia's new whole-population integrated database to ask: Who accesses high-quality ECE services? Australia's national quality rating of ECE services provided whole-of-country standard measurement of ECE quality. We find that, although Australia provides an income-scaled subsidy to families to enable ECE attendance, inequalities are seen in the quality of service accessed. Families experiencing socio-economic disadvantage and those living in regional and remote locations are under-represented in services rated high-quality. Recent immigrants, regardless of their economic status, are most likely to attend poorer quality services. These findings highlight the need to identify and remediate mechanisms preventing those most likely to benefit from the highest quality ECE from access. Such actions are critical to deliver on the promise of ECE to disrupt intergenerational disadvantage and enable sustainable national development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信