使用第二代支架与手术进行颈动脉血运重建:临床结果荟萃分析。

Adam Mazurek, Krzysztof Malinowski, Pasqualino Sirignano, Ralf Kolvenbach, Laura Capoccia, Gianmarco DE Donato, Isabelle VAN Herzeele, Adnan H Siddiqui, Tomaso Castrucci, Lukasz Tekieli, Matteo Stefanini, Christian Wissgott, Kenneth Rosenfield, D Christopher Metzger, Kenneth Snyder, Andrey Karpenko, Waclaw Kuczmik, Eugenio Stabile, Magdalena Knapik, Renato Casana, Piotr Pieniazek, Anna Podlasek, Maurizio Taurino, Joachim Schofer, Alberto Cremonesi, Horst Sievert, Andrej Schmidt, Iris Q Grunwald, Francesco Speziale, Carlo Setacci, Piotr Musialek
{"title":"使用第二代支架与手术进行颈动脉血运重建:临床结果荟萃分析。","authors":"Adam Mazurek, Krzysztof Malinowski, Pasqualino Sirignano, Ralf Kolvenbach, Laura Capoccia, Gianmarco DE Donato, Isabelle VAN Herzeele, Adnan H Siddiqui, Tomaso Castrucci, Lukasz Tekieli, Matteo Stefanini, Christian Wissgott, Kenneth Rosenfield, D Christopher Metzger, Kenneth Snyder, Andrey Karpenko, Waclaw Kuczmik, Eugenio Stabile, Magdalena Knapik, Renato Casana, Piotr Pieniazek, Anna Podlasek, Maurizio Taurino, Joachim Schofer, Alberto Cremonesi, Horst Sievert, Andrej Schmidt, Iris Q Grunwald, Francesco Speziale, Carlo Setacci, Piotr Musialek","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12933-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"64 6","pages":"570-582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Adam Mazurek, Krzysztof Malinowski, Pasqualino Sirignano, Ralf Kolvenbach, Laura Capoccia, Gianmarco DE Donato, Isabelle VAN Herzeele, Adnan H Siddiqui, Tomaso Castrucci, Lukasz Tekieli, Matteo Stefanini, Christian Wissgott, Kenneth Rosenfield, D Christopher Metzger, Kenneth Snyder, Andrey Karpenko, Waclaw Kuczmik, Eugenio Stabile, Magdalena Knapik, Renato Casana, Piotr Pieniazek, Anna Podlasek, Maurizio Taurino, Joachim Schofer, Alberto Cremonesi, Horst Sievert, Andrej Schmidt, Iris Q Grunwald, Francesco Speziale, Carlo Setacci, Piotr Musialek\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12933-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"570-582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12933-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.24.12933-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:Meta 分析和新出现的随机数据表明,与传统(单层)支架相比,第二代("网状")颈动脉支架(SGS)可改善疗效,但已发现不同 SGS 类型在临床表现上存在差异。目前尚无 SGS 与颈动脉内膜剥脱术 (CEA) 的比较:将 SGS 研究中的 30 天死亡(D)、中风(S)、心肌梗死(M)以及 12 个月同侧中风和再狭窄与 CEA 结果进行荟萃分析(随机效应模型)。符合条件的研究是通过 PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE 确定的。对单项研究的绝对不良 Evet 风险以及每项 SGS 设计与当代 CEA 结果的相对结果进行了森林图分析。进行元回归以确定治疗模式效果的潜在调节因素:从25项研究(14项SGS治疗,41%为无症状;9项随机对照试验(RCT)-CEA治疗,37%为无症状;2项血管质量倡议(VQI)-CEA治疗,23%为无症状)的103,642名患者中提取了数据。与 RCT-CEA 相比,Casper/Roadsaver 和 CGuard 可显著降低 DSM(-2.70% 和 -2.95%,PC 结论:对现有临床数据的元分析整合表明1)Casper/Roadsaver 降低了中风率,但增加了再狭窄率;2)CGuard MicroNET 覆盖支架在 30 天和 12 个月内的中风率和再狭窄率均低于作为参考的当代 CEA 结果。这可能会为临床实践提供参考,为低临床事件发生率的大规模随机试验提供依据(PROSPERO-CRD42022339789)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carotid artery revascularization using second generation stents versus surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.

Introduction: Meta-analyses and emerging randomized data indicate that second-generation ('mesh') carotid stents (SGS) may improve outcomes versus conventional (single-layer) stents but clinically-relevant differences in individual SGS-type performance have been identified. No comparisons exist for SGS versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Evidence acquisition: Thirty-day death (D), stroke (S), myocardial infarction (M), and 12-month ipsilateral stroke and restenosis in SGS studies were meta-analyzed (random effect model) against CEA outcomes. Eligible studies were identified through PubMed/EMBASE/COCHRANE. Forest plots were formed for absolute adverse evet risk in individual studies and for relative outcomes with each SGS deign versus contemporary CEA outcomes as reference. Meta-regression was performed to identify potential modifiers of treatment modality effect.

Evidence synthesis: Data were extracted from 103,642 patients in 25 studies (14 SGS-treated, 41% symptomatic; nine randomized controlled trial (RCT)-CEA-treated, 37% symptomatic; and two Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI)-CEA-treated, 23% symptomatic). Casper/Roadsaver and CGuard significantly reduced DSM versus RCT-CEA (-2.70% and -2.95%, P<0.001 for both) and versus VQI-CEA (-1.11% and -1.36%, P<0.001 for both). Gore stent 30-day DSM was similar to RCT-CEA (P=0.581) but increased against VQI-CEA (+2.38%, P=0.033). At 12 months, Casper/Roadsaver ipsilateral stroke rate was lower than RCT-CEA (-0.75%, P=0.026) and similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.584). Restenosis with Casper/Roadsaver was +4.18% vs. RCT-CEA and +4.83% vs. VQI-CEA (P=0.005, P<0.001). CGuard 12-month ipsilateral stroke rate was similar to VQI-CEA (P=0.850) and reduced versus RCT-CEA (-0.63%, P=0.030); restenosis was reduced respectively by -0.26% and -0.63% (P=0.033, P<0.001). Twelve-month Gore stent outcomes were overall inferior to surgery.

Conclusions: Meta-analytic integration of available clinical data indicates: 1) reduction in stroke but increased restenosis rate with Casper/Roadsaver, and 2) reduction in both stroke and restenosis with CGuard MicroNET-covered stent against contemporary CEA outcomes at 30 days and 12 months used as a reference. This may inform clinical practice in anticipation of large-scale randomized trials powered for low clinical event rates (PROSPERO-CRD42022339789).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信