成人重症监护室和重症监护室中吸入挥发性物质治疗哮喘、癫痫和镇静困难:系统回顾

Q4 Medicine
Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-02-20 eCollection Date: 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001050
Kevin Gorsky, Sean Cuninghame, Kesikan Jayaraj, Marat Slessarev, Conall Francoeur, Davinia E Withington, Jennifer Chen, Brian H Cuthbertson, Claudio Martin, Martin Chapman, Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan, Nicole McKinnon, Angela Jerath
{"title":"成人重症监护室和重症监护室中吸入挥发性物质治疗哮喘、癫痫和镇静困难:系统回顾","authors":"Kevin Gorsky, Sean Cuninghame, Kesikan Jayaraj, Marat Slessarev, Conall Francoeur, Davinia E Withington, Jennifer Chen, Brian H Cuthbertson, Claudio Martin, Martin Chapman, Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan, Nicole McKinnon, Angela Jerath","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inhaled volatile anesthetics support management of status asthmaticus (SA), status epilepticus (SE), and difficult sedation (DS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of using inhaled anesthetics for SA, SE, and DS in adult ICU and PICU patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Primary literature search that reported the use of inhaled anesthetics in ventilated patients with SA, SE, and DS from 1970 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Study data points were extracted by two authors independently. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool for case studies/series, Newcastle criteria for cohort/case-control studies, and risk-of-bias framework for clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Primary outcome was volatile efficacy in improving predefined clinical or physiologic endpoints. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and delivery logistics. From 4281 screened studies, the number of included studies/patients across diagnoses and patient groups were: SA (adult: 38/121, pediatric: 28/142), SE (adult: 18/37, pediatric: 5/10), and DS (adult: 21/355, pediatric: 10/90). Quality of evidence was low, consisting mainly of case reports and series. Clinical and physiologic improvement was seen within 1-2 hours of initiating volatiles, with variable efficacy across diagnoses and patient groups: SA (adult: 89-95%, pediatric: 80-97%), SE (adults: 54-100%, pediatric: 60-100%), and DS (adults: 60-90%, pediatric: 62-90%). Most common adverse events were cardiovascular, that is, hypotension and arrhythmias. Inhaled sedatives were commonly delivered using anesthesia machines for SA/SE and miniature vaporizers for DS. Few (10%) of studies reported required non-ICU personnel, and only 16% had ICU volatile delivery protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volatile anesthetics may provide effective treatment in patients with SA, SE, and DS scenarios but the quality of evidence is low. Higher-quality powered prospective studies of the efficacy and safety of using volatile anesthetics to manage SA, SE, and DS patients are required. Education regarding inhaled anesthetics and the protocolization of their use is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10881088/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhaled Volatiles for Status Asthmaticus, Epilepsy, and Difficult Sedation in Adult ICU and PICU: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Gorsky, Sean Cuninghame, Kesikan Jayaraj, Marat Slessarev, Conall Francoeur, Davinia E Withington, Jennifer Chen, Brian H Cuthbertson, Claudio Martin, Martin Chapman, Saptharishi Lalgudi Ganesan, Nicole McKinnon, Angela Jerath\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Inhaled volatile anesthetics support management of status asthmaticus (SA), status epilepticus (SE), and difficult sedation (DS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of using inhaled anesthetics for SA, SE, and DS in adult ICU and PICU patients.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Primary literature search that reported the use of inhaled anesthetics in ventilated patients with SA, SE, and DS from 1970 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Study data points were extracted by two authors independently. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool for case studies/series, Newcastle criteria for cohort/case-control studies, and risk-of-bias framework for clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Primary outcome was volatile efficacy in improving predefined clinical or physiologic endpoints. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and delivery logistics. From 4281 screened studies, the number of included studies/patients across diagnoses and patient groups were: SA (adult: 38/121, pediatric: 28/142), SE (adult: 18/37, pediatric: 5/10), and DS (adult: 21/355, pediatric: 10/90). Quality of evidence was low, consisting mainly of case reports and series. Clinical and physiologic improvement was seen within 1-2 hours of initiating volatiles, with variable efficacy across diagnoses and patient groups: SA (adult: 89-95%, pediatric: 80-97%), SE (adults: 54-100%, pediatric: 60-100%), and DS (adults: 60-90%, pediatric: 62-90%). Most common adverse events were cardiovascular, that is, hypotension and arrhythmias. Inhaled sedatives were commonly delivered using anesthesia machines for SA/SE and miniature vaporizers for DS. Few (10%) of studies reported required non-ICU personnel, and only 16% had ICU volatile delivery protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Volatile anesthetics may provide effective treatment in patients with SA, SE, and DS scenarios but the quality of evidence is low. Higher-quality powered prospective studies of the efficacy and safety of using volatile anesthetics to manage SA, SE, and DS patients are required. Education regarding inhaled anesthetics and the protocolization of their use is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10881088/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical care explorations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:吸入性挥发性麻醉剂有助于治疗哮喘状态(SA)、癫痫状态(SE)和镇静困难(DS)。本研究旨在评估在成人 ICU 和 PICU 患者中使用吸入麻醉剂治疗哮喘状态、癫痫状态和镇静困难的有效性、安全性和可行性:研究选择:主要文献检索:1970 年至 2021 年期间,报告在 SA、SE 和 DS 通气患者中使用吸入麻醉剂的文献:研究数据点由两位作者独立提取。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的评估工具对病例研究/系列研究进行质量评估,采用纽卡斯尔标准对队列/病例对照研究进行质量评估,采用偏倚风险框架对临床试验进行质量评估:主要结果是在改善预定义临床或生理终点方面的挥发性疗效。次要结果为不良事件和运送物流。从 4281 项筛选出的研究中,纳入的研究/患者数量在不同诊断和患者群体中分别为SA(成人:38/121,儿科:28/142)、SE(成人:18/37,儿科:5/10)和DS(成人:21/355,儿科:10/90)。证据质量较低,主要包括病例报告和系列报告。开始使用挥发性药物后 1-2 小时内,临床和生理状况就会得到改善,不同诊断和患者群体的疗效各不相同:SA(成人:89-95%,儿童:80-97%)、SE(成人:54-100%,儿童:60-100%)和 DS(成人:60-90%,儿童:62-90%)。最常见的不良反应是心血管疾病,即低血压和心律失常。吸入镇静剂在 SA/SE 中通常使用麻醉机,在 DS 中通常使用微型喷雾器。很少(10%)的研究报告需要非重症监护室人员,只有 16% 的研究报告制定了重症监护室挥发性给药方案:挥发性麻醉剂可为 SA、SE 和 DS 患者提供有效治疗,但证据质量较低。需要对使用挥发性麻醉剂治疗 SA、SE 和 DS 患者的有效性和安全性进行更高质量的前瞻性研究。需要开展有关吸入麻醉剂的教育并制定其使用规程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inhaled Volatiles for Status Asthmaticus, Epilepsy, and Difficult Sedation in Adult ICU and PICU: A Systematic Review.

Objectives: Inhaled volatile anesthetics support management of status asthmaticus (SA), status epilepticus (SE), and difficult sedation (DS). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and feasibility of using inhaled anesthetics for SA, SE, and DS in adult ICU and PICU patients.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase.

Study selection: Primary literature search that reported the use of inhaled anesthetics in ventilated patients with SA, SE, and DS from 1970 to 2021.

Data extraction: Study data points were extracted by two authors independently. Quality assessment was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool for case studies/series, Newcastle criteria for cohort/case-control studies, and risk-of-bias framework for clinical trials.

Data synthesis: Primary outcome was volatile efficacy in improving predefined clinical or physiologic endpoints. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and delivery logistics. From 4281 screened studies, the number of included studies/patients across diagnoses and patient groups were: SA (adult: 38/121, pediatric: 28/142), SE (adult: 18/37, pediatric: 5/10), and DS (adult: 21/355, pediatric: 10/90). Quality of evidence was low, consisting mainly of case reports and series. Clinical and physiologic improvement was seen within 1-2 hours of initiating volatiles, with variable efficacy across diagnoses and patient groups: SA (adult: 89-95%, pediatric: 80-97%), SE (adults: 54-100%, pediatric: 60-100%), and DS (adults: 60-90%, pediatric: 62-90%). Most common adverse events were cardiovascular, that is, hypotension and arrhythmias. Inhaled sedatives were commonly delivered using anesthesia machines for SA/SE and miniature vaporizers for DS. Few (10%) of studies reported required non-ICU personnel, and only 16% had ICU volatile delivery protocol.

Conclusions: Volatile anesthetics may provide effective treatment in patients with SA, SE, and DS scenarios but the quality of evidence is low. Higher-quality powered prospective studies of the efficacy and safety of using volatile anesthetics to manage SA, SE, and DS patients are required. Education regarding inhaled anesthetics and the protocolization of their use is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信