胫骨远端同种异体移植用于治疗盂骨缺失的肩关节前方不稳定:系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。

IF 4.2 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
American Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1177/03635465231223124
Manjot Singh, Rory Byrne, Kenny Chang, Akash Nadella, Michael Kutschke, Tucker Callanan, Brett D Owens
{"title":"胫骨远端同种异体移植用于治疗盂骨缺失的肩关节前方不稳定:系统性回顾和 Meta 分析。","authors":"Manjot Singh, Rory Byrne, Kenny Chang, Akash Nadella, Michael Kutschke, Tucker Callanan, Brett D Owens","doi":"10.1177/03635465231223124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of a distal tibial allograft (DTA) for reconstruction of a glenoid defect in anterior shoulder instability has grown significantly over the past decade. However, few large-scale clinical studies have investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the DTA procedure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies with data on outcomes and complications in patients who underwent the DTA procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of major bibliographic databases was conducted for articles pertaining to the use of a DTA for the management of anterior shoulder instability with associated glenoid bone loss. Postoperative complications and outcomes were extracted and compiled in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 8 included studies with 329 total participants, the mean patient age was 28.1 ± 10.8 years, 192 (83.8%) patients were male, and the mean follow-up was 38.4 ± 20.5 months. The overall complication rate was 7.1%, with hardware complications (3.8%) being the most common. Partial graft resorption was observed in 36.5% of the participants. Recurrent subluxation was reported in 1.2% of the participants, and recurrent dislocation prompting a reoperation was noted in 0.3% of the participants. There were significant improvements in clinical outcomes, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (40.9-point increase; <i>P</i> < .01), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.2-point increase; <i>P</i> < .01), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (49.4-point decrease; <i>P</i> < .01), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (20.0-point decrease; <i>P</i> = .03), and visual analog scale (2.1-point decrease; <i>P</i> = .05). Additionally, postoperative shoulder range of motion significantly increased from baseline values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DTA procedure was associated with a low complication rate, good clinical outcomes, and improved range of motion among patients with anterior shoulder instability and associated glenoid defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":55528,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"210-216"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distal Tibial Allograft for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Manjot Singh, Rory Byrne, Kenny Chang, Akash Nadella, Michael Kutschke, Tucker Callanan, Brett D Owens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465231223124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of a distal tibial allograft (DTA) for reconstruction of a glenoid defect in anterior shoulder instability has grown significantly over the past decade. However, few large-scale clinical studies have investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the DTA procedure.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies with data on outcomes and complications in patients who underwent the DTA procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of major bibliographic databases was conducted for articles pertaining to the use of a DTA for the management of anterior shoulder instability with associated glenoid bone loss. Postoperative complications and outcomes were extracted and compiled in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 8 included studies with 329 total participants, the mean patient age was 28.1 ± 10.8 years, 192 (83.8%) patients were male, and the mean follow-up was 38.4 ± 20.5 months. The overall complication rate was 7.1%, with hardware complications (3.8%) being the most common. Partial graft resorption was observed in 36.5% of the participants. Recurrent subluxation was reported in 1.2% of the participants, and recurrent dislocation prompting a reoperation was noted in 0.3% of the participants. There were significant improvements in clinical outcomes, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (40.9-point increase; <i>P</i> < .01), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.2-point increase; <i>P</i> < .01), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (49.4-point decrease; <i>P</i> < .01), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (20.0-point decrease; <i>P</i> = .03), and visual analog scale (2.1-point decrease; <i>P</i> = .05). Additionally, postoperative shoulder range of motion significantly increased from baseline values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DTA procedure was associated with a low complication rate, good clinical outcomes, and improved range of motion among patients with anterior shoulder instability and associated glenoid defects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"210-216\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231223124\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231223124","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在过去十年中,使用胫骨远端同种异体移植(DTA)重建肩关节前侧不稳的盂缺损的病例大幅增加。目的:对接受DTA手术治疗复发性肩关节前方不稳定伴盂骨缺损患者的疗效和并发症数据进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:研究设计:系统综述和荟萃分析;证据等级,4级:在主要文献数据库中全面检索了与使用DTA治疗伴有盂骨缺损的肩关节前方不稳定相关的文章。对术后并发症和结果进行了提取和荟萃分析:纳入的 8 项研究共有 329 名参与者,患者平均年龄(28.1 ± 10.8)岁,192 名(83.8%)患者为男性,平均随访时间(38.4 ± 20.5)个月。总体并发症发生率为 7.1%,其中最常见的是硬件并发症(3.8%)。36.5%的患者出现部分移植物吸收。1.2%的参与者出现复发性脱位,0.3%的参与者因复发性脱位而需要再次手术。临床结果有了明显改善,包括美国肩肘外科医生评分(提高40.9分;P < .01)、单次数字评估(提高47.2分;P < .01)、西安大略省肩关节不稳定性指数(降低49.4分;P < .01)、手臂、肩部和手部残疾(降低20.0分;P = .03)以及视觉模拟量表(降低2.1分;P = .05)。此外,术后肩关节活动范围比基线值明显增加:结论:DTA手术并发症发生率低、临床疗效好,并能改善肩关节前侧不稳定和相关盂缺损患者的活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distal Tibial Allograft for the Treatment of Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: The use of a distal tibial allograft (DTA) for reconstruction of a glenoid defect in anterior shoulder instability has grown significantly over the past decade. However, few large-scale clinical studies have investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the DTA procedure.

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies with data on outcomes and complications in patients who underwent the DTA procedure for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss.

Study design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods: A comprehensive search of major bibliographic databases was conducted for articles pertaining to the use of a DTA for the management of anterior shoulder instability with associated glenoid bone loss. Postoperative complications and outcomes were extracted and compiled in a meta-analysis.

Results: Of the 8 included studies with 329 total participants, the mean patient age was 28.1 ± 10.8 years, 192 (83.8%) patients were male, and the mean follow-up was 38.4 ± 20.5 months. The overall complication rate was 7.1%, with hardware complications (3.8%) being the most common. Partial graft resorption was observed in 36.5% of the participants. Recurrent subluxation was reported in 1.2% of the participants, and recurrent dislocation prompting a reoperation was noted in 0.3% of the participants. There were significant improvements in clinical outcomes, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (40.9-point increase; P < .01), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.2-point increase; P < .01), Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (49.4-point decrease; P < .01), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (20.0-point decrease; P = .03), and visual analog scale (2.1-point decrease; P = .05). Additionally, postoperative shoulder range of motion significantly increased from baseline values.

Conclusion: The DTA procedure was associated with a low complication rate, good clinical outcomes, and improved range of motion among patients with anterior shoulder instability and associated glenoid defects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
425
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An invaluable resource for the orthopaedic sports medicine community, _The American Journal of Sports Medicine_ is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, first published in 1972. It is the official publication of the [American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM)](http://www.sportsmed.org/)! The journal acts as an important forum for independent orthopaedic sports medicine research and education, allowing clinical practitioners the ability to make decisions based on sound scientific information. This journal is a must-read for: * Orthopaedic Surgeons and Specialists * Sports Medicine Physicians * Physiatrists * Athletic Trainers * Team Physicians * And Physical Therapists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信