通过数字参与扩大护理协调:评估再入院情况的阶梯式楔形试验。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alexandra Polovneff, Neemit Shah, Abhishek Janardan, Erika Smith, Ivan Pasillas, Natalie Mortensen, Jeana M Holt, Melek Somai, Rodney Sparapani, Bradley Crotty
{"title":"通过数字参与扩大护理协调:评估再入院情况的阶梯式楔形试验。","authors":"Alexandra Polovneff, Neemit Shah, Abhishek Janardan, Erika Smith, Ivan Pasillas, Natalie Mortensen, Jeana M Holt, Melek Somai, Rodney Sparapani, Bradley Crotty","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transitions of care are pivotal, vulnerable times as patients are discharged from the hospital. Telephonic care coordination is standard care, but labor intensive. We implemented a patient postdischarge digital engagement (PDDE) program to scale coordination. We hypothesized that PDDE could reduce readmissions for low-risk patients and supplement care coordination for medium- and high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomization trial with 5 implementation waves based upon primary care clinic region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All inpatient hospital discharges between March 2020 and November 2020 were stratified by readmission risk. Low-risk patients were offered access to PDDE, and moderate-risk and high-risk patients were offered access to PDDE and care coordination. Readmission was defined as an unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days from discharge. An intention-to-treat primary analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression clustering for wave; a treatment-on-the-treated analysis was also conducted to assess the impact among program users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5490 patient discharges were examined (2735 control; 2755 intervention); 1949 patients were high risk, 2032 were medium risk, and 1509 were low risk. PDDE intervention did not significantly affect readmission among low-risk (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.90; P  = .23), medium-risk (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.60; P  = .21), and high-risk (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.64; P  = .48) groups after adjustment for time and patient factors. In a treatment-on-the-treated analysis, among patients who activated the PDDE program, readmission was also similar among the low-, medium-, and high-risk cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study expanded resource-limited care coordination by offering low-risk patients a service they were unable to receive previously while having no impact on readmission. PDDE efficiently provided additional touch points between patients and providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scaling care coordination through digital engagement: stepped-wedge trial assessing readmissions.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Polovneff, Neemit Shah, Abhishek Janardan, Erika Smith, Ivan Pasillas, Natalie Mortensen, Jeana M Holt, Melek Somai, Rodney Sparapani, Bradley Crotty\",\"doi\":\"10.37765/ajmc.2024.89498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Transitions of care are pivotal, vulnerable times as patients are discharged from the hospital. Telephonic care coordination is standard care, but labor intensive. We implemented a patient postdischarge digital engagement (PDDE) program to scale coordination. We hypothesized that PDDE could reduce readmissions for low-risk patients and supplement care coordination for medium- and high-risk patients.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomization trial with 5 implementation waves based upon primary care clinic region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All inpatient hospital discharges between March 2020 and November 2020 were stratified by readmission risk. Low-risk patients were offered access to PDDE, and moderate-risk and high-risk patients were offered access to PDDE and care coordination. Readmission was defined as an unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days from discharge. An intention-to-treat primary analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression clustering for wave; a treatment-on-the-treated analysis was also conducted to assess the impact among program users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 5490 patient discharges were examined (2735 control; 2755 intervention); 1949 patients were high risk, 2032 were medium risk, and 1509 were low risk. PDDE intervention did not significantly affect readmission among low-risk (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.90; P  = .23), medium-risk (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.60; P  = .21), and high-risk (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.64; P  = .48) groups after adjustment for time and patient factors. In a treatment-on-the-treated analysis, among patients who activated the PDDE program, readmission was also similar among the low-, medium-, and high-risk cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study expanded resource-limited care coordination by offering low-risk patients a service they were unable to receive previously while having no impact on readmission. PDDE efficiently provided additional touch points between patients and providers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Managed Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2024.89498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:在病人出院时,护理过渡是非常关键和脆弱的时期。电话护理协调是标准护理,但需要大量人力。我们实施了一项患者出院后数字参与(PDDE)计划,以扩大协调范围。我们假设,PDDE 可以降低低风险患者的再入院率,并对中高风险患者的护理协调起到补充作用:研究设计:务实的阶梯式分组随机试验,根据初级保健诊所所在区域分为 5 个实施阶段:根据再入院风险对 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 11 月期间的所有出院住院患者进行分层。低风险患者可获得 PDDE,中度风险和高风险患者可获得 PDDE 和护理协调。再入院定义为出院后 30 天内的非计划住院。采用混合效应逻辑回归对波浪进行聚类,进行了意向治疗初级分析;还进行了治疗对治疗的分析,以评估计划使用者的影响:共检查了5490名出院患者(2735名对照组;2755名干预组);1949名患者为高风险,2032名患者为中风险,1509名患者为低风险。在对时间和患者因素进行调整后,PDDE 干预对低风险组(95% CI,-0.23 至 0.90;P = .23)、中风险组(95% CI,-0.14 至 0.60;P = .21)和高风险组(95% CI,-0.32 至 0.64;P = .48)的再入院率没有明显影响。在治疗对治疗的分析中,在启动PDDE项目的患者中,低、中、高风险组的再入院情况也相似:我们的研究扩大了资源有限的护理协调,为低风险患者提供了他们以前无法获得的服务,同时对再入院没有影响。PDDE 在患者和医疗服务提供者之间有效地提供了额外的接触点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scaling care coordination through digital engagement: stepped-wedge trial assessing readmissions.

Objectives: Transitions of care are pivotal, vulnerable times as patients are discharged from the hospital. Telephonic care coordination is standard care, but labor intensive. We implemented a patient postdischarge digital engagement (PDDE) program to scale coordination. We hypothesized that PDDE could reduce readmissions for low-risk patients and supplement care coordination for medium- and high-risk patients.

Study design: Pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomization trial with 5 implementation waves based upon primary care clinic region.

Methods: All inpatient hospital discharges between March 2020 and November 2020 were stratified by readmission risk. Low-risk patients were offered access to PDDE, and moderate-risk and high-risk patients were offered access to PDDE and care coordination. Readmission was defined as an unplanned inpatient admission within 30 days from discharge. An intention-to-treat primary analysis was conducted using mixed-effects logistic regression clustering for wave; a treatment-on-the-treated analysis was also conducted to assess the impact among program users.

Results: A total of 5490 patient discharges were examined (2735 control; 2755 intervention); 1949 patients were high risk, 2032 were medium risk, and 1509 were low risk. PDDE intervention did not significantly affect readmission among low-risk (95% CI, -0.23 to 0.90; P  = .23), medium-risk (95% CI, -0.14 to 0.60; P  = .21), and high-risk (95% CI, -0.32 to 0.64; P  = .48) groups after adjustment for time and patient factors. In a treatment-on-the-treated analysis, among patients who activated the PDDE program, readmission was also similar among the low-, medium-, and high-risk cohorts.

Conclusions: Our study expanded resource-limited care coordination by offering low-risk patients a service they were unable to receive previously while having no impact on readmission. PDDE efficiently provided additional touch points between patients and providers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信