分析机器人手术的多专科应用扩大对机器人泌尿外科护理的影响:对两家加拿大学术医院长达十年的评估。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ahmed Ibrahim, Imad Matta, Ahmed S Zakaria, Abdulghani Khogeer, Nick Lee, Tawfik Elseherbini, David-Dan Nguyen, Nicholas J Corsi, David Bouhadana, Adel Arezki, Anindyo Chakraborty, Malek Meskawi, Assaad Elhakim, Kevin C Zorn
{"title":"分析机器人手术的多专科应用扩大对机器人泌尿外科护理的影响:对两家加拿大学术医院长达十年的评估。","authors":"Ahmed Ibrahim, Imad Matta, Ahmed S Zakaria, Abdulghani Khogeer, Nick Lee, Tawfik Elseherbini, David-Dan Nguyen, Nicholas J Corsi, David Bouhadana, Adel Arezki, Anindyo Chakraborty, Malek Meskawi, Assaad Elhakim, Kevin C Zorn","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most robot-assisted surgery (RAS) systems in Canada are donor-funded, with constraints on implementation and access due to significant costs, among other factors. Herein, we evaluated the impact of the growing multispecialty use of RAS on urologic RAS access and outcomes in the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all RAS performed by different surgical specialties in two high-volume academic hospitals between 2010 and 2019 (prior to the COVID pandemic). The assessed outcomes included the effect of increased robot access over the years on annual robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) volumes, surgical waiting times (SWT), and pathologically positive surgical margins (PSM). Data were collected and analyzed from the robotic system and hospital databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, six specialties (urology, gynecology, general, cardiac, thoracic, and otorhinolaryngologic surgery) were included over the study period. RAS access by specialty doubled since 2010 (from three to six). The number of active robotic surgeons tripled from seven surgeons in 2010 to 20 surgeons in 2019. Moreover, there was a significant drop in average case volume, from a peak of 40 cases in 2014 to 25 cases in 2019 (p=0.02). RARP annual case volume followed a similar pattern, reaching a maximum of 166 cases in 2014, then declining to 137 cases in 2019. The mean SWT was substantially increased from 52 days in 2014 to 73 days in 2019; however, PSM rates were not affected by the reduction in surgical volumes (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the last decade, RAS access by specialty has increased at two Canadian academic centers due to growing multispecialty use. As there was a fixed, single-robotic system at each of the hospital centers, there was a substantial reduction in the number of RAS performed per surgeon over time, as well as a gradual increase in the SWT. The current low number of available robots and unsustainable funding resources may hinder universal patient access to RAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the influence of expanding multispecialty adoption of robotic surgery on robotic urologic care A decade-long assessment of two Canadian academic hospitals.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Ibrahim, Imad Matta, Ahmed S Zakaria, Abdulghani Khogeer, Nick Lee, Tawfik Elseherbini, David-Dan Nguyen, Nicholas J Corsi, David Bouhadana, Adel Arezki, Anindyo Chakraborty, Malek Meskawi, Assaad Elhakim, Kevin C Zorn\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.8524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most robot-assisted surgery (RAS) systems in Canada are donor-funded, with constraints on implementation and access due to significant costs, among other factors. Herein, we evaluated the impact of the growing multispecialty use of RAS on urologic RAS access and outcomes in the past decade.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of all RAS performed by different surgical specialties in two high-volume academic hospitals between 2010 and 2019 (prior to the COVID pandemic). The assessed outcomes included the effect of increased robot access over the years on annual robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) volumes, surgical waiting times (SWT), and pathologically positive surgical margins (PSM). Data were collected and analyzed from the robotic system and hospital databases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, six specialties (urology, gynecology, general, cardiac, thoracic, and otorhinolaryngologic surgery) were included over the study period. RAS access by specialty doubled since 2010 (from three to six). The number of active robotic surgeons tripled from seven surgeons in 2010 to 20 surgeons in 2019. Moreover, there was a significant drop in average case volume, from a peak of 40 cases in 2014 to 25 cases in 2019 (p=0.02). RARP annual case volume followed a similar pattern, reaching a maximum of 166 cases in 2014, then declining to 137 cases in 2019. The mean SWT was substantially increased from 52 days in 2014 to 73 days in 2019; however, PSM rates were not affected by the reduction in surgical volumes (p<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Over the last decade, RAS access by specialty has increased at two Canadian academic centers due to growing multispecialty use. As there was a fixed, single-robotic system at each of the hospital centers, there was a substantial reduction in the number of RAS performed per surgeon over time, as well as a gradual increase in the SWT. The current low number of available robots and unsustainable funding resources may hinder universal patient access to RAS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8524\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:加拿大的大多数机器人辅助手术(RAS)系统都是由捐赠者资助的,由于成本高昂等因素,其实施和使用受到限制。在此,我们评估了过去十年间机器人辅助手术在多专科领域的广泛应用对泌尿外科机器人辅助手术使用和结果的影响:方法:我们对 2010 年至 2019 年(COVID 大流行之前)两家高流量学术医院不同外科专科实施的所有 RAS 进行了回顾性审查。评估的结果包括这些年来机器人使用率的提高对每年机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)手术量、手术等待时间(SWT)和病理阳性手术切缘(PSM)的影响。我们从机器人系统和医院数据库中收集并分析了数据:研究期间共纳入了六个专科(泌尿外科、妇科、普外科、心脏外科、胸外科和耳鼻喉科)。自2010年以来,各专科使用机器人手术系统的人数翻了一番(从3人增至6人)。活跃的机器人外科医生数量增加了两倍,从 2010 年的 7 名外科医生增加到 2019 年的 20 名外科医生。此外,平均病例量大幅下降,从2014年的峰值40例降至2019年的25例(p=0.02)。RARP年病例量也遵循类似的模式,2014年达到最高值166例,然后下降到2019年的137例。平均 SWT 从 2014 年的 52 天大幅增加到 2019 年的 73 天;然而,PSM 率并未受到手术量减少的影响(p 结论:在过去十年中,由于多专科使用的情况日益增多,加拿大两所学术中心按专科划分的手术辅助系统访问量也有所增加。由于每个医院中心都有一个固定的单机器人系统,随着时间的推移,每位外科医生完成的 RAS 数量大幅减少,而 SWT 则逐渐增加。目前可用的机器人数量较少,资金来源也难以为继,这可能会阻碍患者普遍使用 RAS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the influence of expanding multispecialty adoption of robotic surgery on robotic urologic care A decade-long assessment of two Canadian academic hospitals.

Introduction: Most robot-assisted surgery (RAS) systems in Canada are donor-funded, with constraints on implementation and access due to significant costs, among other factors. Herein, we evaluated the impact of the growing multispecialty use of RAS on urologic RAS access and outcomes in the past decade.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of all RAS performed by different surgical specialties in two high-volume academic hospitals between 2010 and 2019 (prior to the COVID pandemic). The assessed outcomes included the effect of increased robot access over the years on annual robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) volumes, surgical waiting times (SWT), and pathologically positive surgical margins (PSM). Data were collected and analyzed from the robotic system and hospital databases.

Results: In total, six specialties (urology, gynecology, general, cardiac, thoracic, and otorhinolaryngologic surgery) were included over the study period. RAS access by specialty doubled since 2010 (from three to six). The number of active robotic surgeons tripled from seven surgeons in 2010 to 20 surgeons in 2019. Moreover, there was a significant drop in average case volume, from a peak of 40 cases in 2014 to 25 cases in 2019 (p=0.02). RARP annual case volume followed a similar pattern, reaching a maximum of 166 cases in 2014, then declining to 137 cases in 2019. The mean SWT was substantially increased from 52 days in 2014 to 73 days in 2019; however, PSM rates were not affected by the reduction in surgical volumes (p<0.05).

Conclusions: Over the last decade, RAS access by specialty has increased at two Canadian academic centers due to growing multispecialty use. As there was a fixed, single-robotic system at each of the hospital centers, there was a substantial reduction in the number of RAS performed per surgeon over time, as well as a gradual increase in the SWT. The current low number of available robots and unsustainable funding resources may hinder universal patient access to RAS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信