冲击波疗法与纤维肌痛及其对疼痛、血液指标、影像学和参与者体验的影响--一项多学科随机对照试验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-21 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503
Paolo Sanzo, Martina Agostino, Wesley Fidler, Jane Lawrence-Dewar, Erin Pearson, Carlos Zerpa, Sarah Niccoli, Simon J Lees
{"title":"冲击波疗法与纤维肌痛及其对疼痛、血液指标、影像学和参与者体验的影响--一项多学科随机对照试验。","authors":"Paolo Sanzo, Martina Agostino, Wesley Fidler, Jane Lawrence-Dewar, Erin Pearson, Carlos Zerpa, Sarah Niccoli, Simon J Lees","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with fibromyalgia experience chronic, widespread pain. It remains a misunderstood disorder with multimodal treatments providing mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effects of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) compared to placebo on pain, pain catastrophizing, psychological indices, blood markers, and neuroimaging. Study-related experiences were also explored qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative sensory testing (QST), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beighton Scoring Screen (BSS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), blood biomarker (Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), and brain fMRI were measured pre- and post-treatment along with a post-treatment survey. The RSWT group received five treatments (one week apart over five-week period) to the three most painful areas (500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz, then 1000 shocks at 2 bar and 8 Hz, and finally 500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz) versus sham treatment for the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the BSS for hypermobility (<i>p</i> = .21; <i>d</i> = .74), PCS (<i>p</i> = .70; <i>d</i> = .22), VAS (<i>p = .17-.61</i>; <i>d</i> = .20-.83) scores, QST for skin temperature and stimuli (<i>p = .14-.65</i>; <i>d</i> = .25-.88), and for the pressure pain threshold (<i>p = .71-.93</i>; <i>d</i> = .05-.21). The VAS scores had clinically significant changes (MCID greater than 13.90) with improved pain scores in the RSWT group. Neuroimaging scans revealed no cortical thickness changes. Post-treatment surveys revealed pain and symptom improvements and offered hope to individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSWT was implemented safely, without any negative treatment effects reported, and acted as a pain modulator to reduce sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identification number NCT02760212.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"99-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shockwave therapy and fibromyalgia and its effect on pain, blood markers, imaging, and participant experience - a multidisciplinary randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Sanzo, Martina Agostino, Wesley Fidler, Jane Lawrence-Dewar, Erin Pearson, Carlos Zerpa, Sarah Niccoli, Simon J Lees\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with fibromyalgia experience chronic, widespread pain. It remains a misunderstood disorder with multimodal treatments providing mixed results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effects of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) compared to placebo on pain, pain catastrophizing, psychological indices, blood markers, and neuroimaging. Study-related experiences were also explored qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Quantitative sensory testing (QST), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beighton Scoring Screen (BSS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), blood biomarker (Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), and brain fMRI were measured pre- and post-treatment along with a post-treatment survey. The RSWT group received five treatments (one week apart over five-week period) to the three most painful areas (500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz, then 1000 shocks at 2 bar and 8 Hz, and finally 500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz) versus sham treatment for the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in the BSS for hypermobility (<i>p</i> = .21; <i>d</i> = .74), PCS (<i>p</i> = .70; <i>d</i> = .22), VAS (<i>p = .17-.61</i>; <i>d</i> = .20-.83) scores, QST for skin temperature and stimuli (<i>p = .14-.65</i>; <i>d</i> = .25-.88), and for the pressure pain threshold (<i>p = .71-.93</i>; <i>d</i> = .05-.21). The VAS scores had clinically significant changes (MCID greater than 13.90) with improved pain scores in the RSWT group. Neuroimaging scans revealed no cortical thickness changes. Post-treatment surveys revealed pain and symptom improvements and offered hope to individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RSWT was implemented safely, without any negative treatment effects reported, and acted as a pain modulator to reduce sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identification number NCT02760212.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"99-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2321503","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:纤维肌痛患者会出现慢性、广泛性疼痛。纤维肌痛仍是一种被误解的疾病,多模式治疗的效果参差不齐:研究径向冲击波疗法(RSWT)与安慰剂相比对疼痛、疼痛灾难化、心理指数、血液标志物和神经影像学的影响。此外,还对与研究相关的体验进行了定性探讨:方法:对定量感觉测试(QST)、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Beighton 评分筛查(BSS)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、血液生物标志物(白细胞介素(IL)-6 和 IL-10)以及脑部 fMRI 进行治疗前和治疗后测量,并进行治疗后调查。RSWT组在三个最疼痛的部位接受了五次治疗(间隔一周,为期五周)(在1.5巴和15赫兹的压力下冲击500次,然后在2巴和8赫兹的压力下冲击1000次,最后在1.5巴和15赫兹的压力下冲击500次),而安慰剂组则接受了假治疗:BSS中的过度活动度(p = .21;d = .74)、PCS(p = .70;d = .22)、VAS(p = .17-.61;d = .20-.83)评分、QST中的皮肤温度和刺激(p = .14-.65;d = .25-.88)以及压力痛阈值(p = .71-.93;d = .05-.21)差异均无统计学意义。VAS 评分的变化具有临床意义(MCID 大于 13.90),RSWT 组的疼痛评分有所改善。神经影像扫描显示皮质厚度没有变化。治疗后的调查显示疼痛和症状有所改善,给患者带来了希望:临床试验注册:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 识别号 NCT02760212。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shockwave therapy and fibromyalgia and its effect on pain, blood markers, imaging, and participant experience - a multidisciplinary randomized controlled trial.

Background: Patients with fibromyalgia experience chronic, widespread pain. It remains a misunderstood disorder with multimodal treatments providing mixed results.

Objectives: To examine the effects of radial shockwave therapy (RSWT) compared to placebo on pain, pain catastrophizing, psychological indices, blood markers, and neuroimaging. Study-related experiences were also explored qualitatively.

Methods: Quantitative sensory testing (QST), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Beighton Scoring Screen (BSS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), blood biomarker (Interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), and brain fMRI were measured pre- and post-treatment along with a post-treatment survey. The RSWT group received five treatments (one week apart over five-week period) to the three most painful areas (500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz, then 1000 shocks at 2 bar and 8 Hz, and finally 500 shocks at 1.5 bar and 15 Hz) versus sham treatment for the placebo group.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the BSS for hypermobility (p = .21; d = .74), PCS (p = .70; d = .22), VAS (p = .17-.61; d = .20-.83) scores, QST for skin temperature and stimuli (p = .14-.65; d = .25-.88), and for the pressure pain threshold (p = .71-.93; d = .05-.21). The VAS scores had clinically significant changes (MCID greater than 13.90) with improved pain scores in the RSWT group. Neuroimaging scans revealed no cortical thickness changes. Post-treatment surveys revealed pain and symptom improvements and offered hope to individuals.

Conclusion: RSWT was implemented safely, without any negative treatment effects reported, and acted as a pain modulator to reduce sensitivity.

Clinical trials registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identification number NCT02760212.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信