胸主动脉瘤,一个中心的 10 年经验和疗效分析。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1177/17085381241236575
Leonor Baldaia, Mariana Duque, Miguel Silva, Eduardo Silva, Celso Nunes, Vânia Constâncio, Luís Orelhas, Manuel Fonseca, Luís F Antunes
{"title":"胸主动脉瘤,一个中心的 10 年经验和疗效分析。","authors":"Leonor Baldaia, Mariana Duque, Miguel Silva, Eduardo Silva, Celso Nunes, Vânia Constâncio, Luís Orelhas, Manuel Fonseca, Luís F Antunes","doi":"10.1177/17085381241236575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, <i>p</i> = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; <i>p</i> = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (<i>p</i> = .001), but not with higher mortality rates (<i>p</i> = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"1398-1402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thoracic aortic aneurysms, a single center's 10-years experience and analysis of outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Leonor Baldaia, Mariana Duque, Miguel Silva, Eduardo Silva, Celso Nunes, Vânia Constâncio, Luís Orelhas, Manuel Fonseca, Luís F Antunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17085381241236575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, <i>p</i> = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; <i>p</i> = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (<i>p</i> = .001), but not with higher mortality rates (<i>p</i> = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1398-1402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241236575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241236575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:胸主动脉瘤(TAAs)是一种日益普遍的病理现象,其相关发病率和死亡率都很高。胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)是主要的治疗方法。本研究的目的是分析一个中心在治疗 TAAs 方面的经验,并找出导致治疗效果变差的可能风险因素:我们对本机构的数据库进行了回顾性审查,以确定从2012年1月1日至2022年12月31日这10年间接受TAAs治疗的所有患者。数据提取自患者的医疗记录。主要结果是全因死亡率,次要结果是手术相关的发病率(血管通路并发症、髓腔缺血、中风、内漏、移位、动脉瘤囊增大 >5 mm),以及随访 1、6 和 12 个月时是否需要再次手术。对数据进行了描述性和推论性分析。统计分析采用 IBM 社会科学统计软件包 (SPSS) 软件进行:在此期间,我们共发现了 34 名接受 TAAs 治疗的患者。平均年龄为 68 岁 [47-87],79.4% 的患者为男性。动脉瘤的平均直径为 63 毫米 [35-100],55.9% 为纺锤形,44.1% 为囊状。大多数动脉瘤(91.2%)位于降胸主动脉,其中 3 个(8.8%)延伸至主动脉弓。最常见的病因是退行性病变,有 22 名患者(64.7%),其次是主动脉夹层,有 8 名患者(23.5%)。19名患者(61.3%)进行了选择性手术,12名患者(38.7%)进行了紧急修复。24名患者(77.4%)选择了TEVAR治疗,其余7名患者(22.6%)接受了混合手术治疗。平均住院时间为 10 天 [2-80] (选择性修复为 6 天,紧急修复为 16 天,P = .016)。随访时间从1个月到10年不等。随访一年后,全因死亡率为 15%,发病率为 30%(其中 6 名患者(22%)出现 Ia 型内漏),需要再次手术的比例为 22%。动脉瘤直径是导致手术相关发病率的重要风险因素(中位直径为 73.5 毫米,而无发病率患者的中位直径为 56.0 毫米;P = 0.027)。Ia 型内漏与较高的再介入率显著相关(p = .001),但与较高的死亡率无关(p = .515)。年龄、女性性别、病因和紧急修复与结果的显著差异无关:结论:TEVAR被证明是治疗TAAs的有效方法,短期和中期随访结果良好。TAAs应及早诊断,并在符合标准时及时治疗,以防止恶化的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thoracic aortic aneurysms, a single center's 10-years experience and analysis of outcomes.

Introduction: Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are an increasingly prevalent pathology with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is the primary line of treatment. The purpose of this study was to analyse a single center's experience in the treatment of TAAs and identify possible risk factors for worse outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of our institutional database was done to identify all patients treated for TAAs in a 10-year period, from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Data were extracted from patients' medical records. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were procedure related morbidity (vascular access complications, medullary ischaemia, stroke, endoleaks, migration, aneurysm sac enlargement >5 mm) and need for reintervention at 1-, 6- and 12-month follow-up. A descriptive and inferential analysis of the data was performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software.

Results: We identified 34 patients treated for TAAs in this period. Mean age was 68 years [47-87] and 79.4% of patients were male. Mean aneurysm diameter was 63 mm [35-100], 55.9% fusiform and 44.1% saccular. The majority (91.2%) were located at the descending thoracic aorta and 3 (8.8%) of them extended to the aortic arch. The most common aetiology was degenerative in 22 patients (64.7%), followed by aortic dissection in 8 patients (23.5%). Elective surgery was performed in 19 (61.3%) patients and 12 (38.7%) had urgent repair. TEVAR was the treatment of choice in 24 (77.4%) patients, and the remaining 7 (22.6%) were treated with hybrid surgery. Mean length of hospital stay was 10 days [2-80] (6 days for elective repair versus 16 days for urgent repair, p = .016). Follow-up period ranged from 1 month to 10 years. At 1 year follow-up, all-cause mortality was 15%, morbidity was 30% (with 6 (22%) patients having a type Ia endoleak) and need for reintervention was 22%. Aneurysm diameter was a significant risk factor for procedure related morbidity (median diameter of 73.5 mm versus 56.0 mm in patients with no morbidity; p = .027). The presence of type Ia endoleak was significantly associated with higher reintervention rates (p = .001), but not with higher mortality rates (p = .515). Age, female sex, aetiology and urgent repair weren't associated with any significant differences in the outcomes.

Conclusions: TEVAR proved to be effective in the treatment of TAAs, with good outcomes at short and mid-term follow-up. TAAs should be diagnosed earlier and be promptly treated when meeting criteria to prevent worse outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信