Ana R Fouto, Rafael N Henriques, Marc Golub, Andreia C Freitas, Amparo Ruiz-Tagle, Inês Esteves, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Nuno A Silva, Pedro Vilela, Patrícia Figueiredo, Rita G Nunes
{"title":"截断弥散核磁共振成像扫描对弥散峰度成像的影响。","authors":"Ana R Fouto, Rafael N Henriques, Marc Golub, Andreia C Freitas, Amparo Ruiz-Tagle, Inês Esteves, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Nuno A Silva, Pedro Vilela, Patrícia Figueiredo, Rita G Nunes","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01153-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) extends diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion effects but requires longer acquisition times. To ensure the robustness of DKI parameters, data acquisition ordering should be optimized allowing for scan interruptions or shortening. Three methodologies were used to examine how reduced diffusion MRI scans impact DKI histogram-metrics: 1) the electrostatic repulsion model (Opt<sub>EEM</sub>); 2) spherical codes (Opt<sub>SC</sub>); 3) random (Random<sub>TRUNC</sub>).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pre-acquired diffusion multi-shell data from 14 female healthy volunteers (29±5 years) were used to generate reordered data. For each strategy, subsets containing different amounts of the full dataset were generated. The subsampling effects were assessed on histogram-based DKI metrics from tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) skeletonized maps. To evaluate each subsampling method on simulated data at different SNRs and the influence of subsampling on in vivo data, we used a 3-way and 2-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulations showed that subsampling had different effects depending on DKI parameter, with fractional anisotropy the most stable (up to 5% error) and radial kurtosis the least stable (up to 26% error). Random<sub>TRUNC</sub> performed the worst while the others showed comparable results. Furthermore, the impact of subsampling varied across distinct histogram characteristics, the peak value the least affected (Opt<sub>EEM</sub>: up to 5% error; Opt<sub>SC</sub>: up to 7% error) and peak height (Opt<sub>EEM</sub>: up to 8% error; Opt<sub>SC</sub>: up to 11% error) the most affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of truncation depends on specific histogram-based DKI metrics. The use of a strategy for optimizing the acquisition order is advisable to improve DKI robustness to exam interruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"859-872"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of truncating diffusion MRI scans on diffusional kurtosis imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Ana R Fouto, Rafael N Henriques, Marc Golub, Andreia C Freitas, Amparo Ruiz-Tagle, Inês Esteves, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Nuno A Silva, Pedro Vilela, Patrícia Figueiredo, Rita G Nunes\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10334-024-01153-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) extends diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion effects but requires longer acquisition times. To ensure the robustness of DKI parameters, data acquisition ordering should be optimized allowing for scan interruptions or shortening. Three methodologies were used to examine how reduced diffusion MRI scans impact DKI histogram-metrics: 1) the electrostatic repulsion model (Opt<sub>EEM</sub>); 2) spherical codes (Opt<sub>SC</sub>); 3) random (Random<sub>TRUNC</sub>).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Pre-acquired diffusion multi-shell data from 14 female healthy volunteers (29±5 years) were used to generate reordered data. For each strategy, subsets containing different amounts of the full dataset were generated. The subsampling effects were assessed on histogram-based DKI metrics from tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) skeletonized maps. To evaluate each subsampling method on simulated data at different SNRs and the influence of subsampling on in vivo data, we used a 3-way and 2-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulations showed that subsampling had different effects depending on DKI parameter, with fractional anisotropy the most stable (up to 5% error) and radial kurtosis the least stable (up to 26% error). Random<sub>TRUNC</sub> performed the worst while the others showed comparable results. Furthermore, the impact of subsampling varied across distinct histogram characteristics, the peak value the least affected (Opt<sub>EEM</sub>: up to 5% error; Opt<sub>SC</sub>: up to 7% error) and peak height (Opt<sub>EEM</sub>: up to 8% error; Opt<sub>SC</sub>: up to 11% error) the most affected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The impact of truncation depends on specific histogram-based DKI metrics. The use of a strategy for optimizing the acquisition order is advisable to improve DKI robustness to exam interruptions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"859-872\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11452422/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01153-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01153-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:扩散峰度成像(DKI)是对扩散张量成像(DTI)的扩展,可描述非高斯扩散效应,但需要较长的采集时间。为确保 DKI 参数的稳健性,应优化数据采集顺序,允许中断或缩短扫描时间。我们采用了三种方法来研究减少扩散 MRI 扫描对 DKI 直方图指标的影响:1) 静电排斥模型 (OptEEM);2) 球形编码 (OptSC);3) 随机 (RandomTRUNC):使用预先获得的 14 名女性健康志愿者(29±5 岁)的扩散多壳数据生成重新排序的数据。每种策略都会生成包含不同数量完整数据集的子集。通过基于道的空间统计(TBSS)骨架图,评估了基于直方图的 DKI 指标的子采样效果。为了评估每种子取样方法在不同信噪比下对模拟数据的影响,以及子取样对体内数据的影响,我们分别使用了 3 向和 2 向重复测量方差分析:模拟结果表明,子取样会因 DKI 参数的不同而产生不同的影响,其中分数各向异性最稳定(误差不超过 5%),径向峰度最不稳定(误差不超过 26%)。RandomTRUNC 的表现最差,而其他参数的表现不相上下。此外,子采样对不同直方图特征的影响也不同,峰值受影响最小(OptEEM:误差达 5%;OptSC:误差达 7%),峰高受影响最大(OptEEM:误差达 8%;OptSC:误差达 11%):结论:截断的影响取决于基于直方图的特定 DKI 指标。结论:截断的影响取决于特定的基于直方图的 DKI 指标,最好采用优化采集顺序的策略,以提高 DKI 对检查中断的稳健性。
Impact of truncating diffusion MRI scans on diffusional kurtosis imaging.
Objective: Diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) extends diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), characterizing non-Gaussian diffusion effects but requires longer acquisition times. To ensure the robustness of DKI parameters, data acquisition ordering should be optimized allowing for scan interruptions or shortening. Three methodologies were used to examine how reduced diffusion MRI scans impact DKI histogram-metrics: 1) the electrostatic repulsion model (OptEEM); 2) spherical codes (OptSC); 3) random (RandomTRUNC).
Materials and methods: Pre-acquired diffusion multi-shell data from 14 female healthy volunteers (29±5 years) were used to generate reordered data. For each strategy, subsets containing different amounts of the full dataset were generated. The subsampling effects were assessed on histogram-based DKI metrics from tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) skeletonized maps. To evaluate each subsampling method on simulated data at different SNRs and the influence of subsampling on in vivo data, we used a 3-way and 2-way repeated measures ANOVA, respectively.
Results: Simulations showed that subsampling had different effects depending on DKI parameter, with fractional anisotropy the most stable (up to 5% error) and radial kurtosis the least stable (up to 26% error). RandomTRUNC performed the worst while the others showed comparable results. Furthermore, the impact of subsampling varied across distinct histogram characteristics, the peak value the least affected (OptEEM: up to 5% error; OptSC: up to 7% error) and peak height (OptEEM: up to 8% error; OptSC: up to 11% error) the most affected.
Conclusion: The impact of truncation depends on specific histogram-based DKI metrics. The use of a strategy for optimizing the acquisition order is advisable to improve DKI robustness to exam interruptions.
期刊介绍:
MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include:
advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology,
new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine,
study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance,
reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.