皮下自动注射器的针盾尺寸和作用力对注射深度有显著影响。

IF 3.7 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Anne-Sofie Madsen Staples, Mette Poulsen, Kezia Ann Friis Præstmark, Thomas Sparre, Marie Sand Traberg
{"title":"皮下自动注射器的针盾尺寸和作用力对注射深度有显著影响。","authors":"Anne-Sofie Madsen Staples, Mette Poulsen, Kezia Ann Friis Præstmark, Thomas Sparre, Marie Sand Traberg","doi":"10.1177/19322968241231996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines how shield-triggered autoinjectors (AIs), for subcutaneous drug delivery, affect injection depth. It focuses on shield size and applied force, parameters that could potentially lead to inadvertent intramuscular (IM) injections due to tissue compression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A blinded ex-vivo study was performed to assess the impact of shield size and applied force on injection depth. Shields of 15, 20, and 30 mm diameters and forces from 2 to 10 N were investigated. The study involved 55 injections in three Landrace, Yorkshire, and Duroc (LYD) pigs, with injection depths measured with computed tomography (CT). An in-vivo study, involving 20 injections in three LYD pigs, controlled the findings, using fluoroscopy (FS) videos for depth measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CT study revealed that smaller shield sizes significantly increased injection depth. With a 15 mm diameter shield, 10 N applied force, and 5 mm needle protrusion, the injection depth exceeded the needle length by over 3 mm. Injection depth increased with higher applied forces until a plateau was reached around 8 N. Both applied force and size were significant factors for injection depth (analysis of variance [ANOVA], <i>P</i> < .05) in the CT study. The FS study confirmed the ex-vivo findings in an in-vivo setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates that shield size has a greater impact on injection depth than the applied force. While conducted in porcine tissue, the study provides useful insights into the relative effects of shield size and applied force. Further investigations in humans are needed to confirm the predicted injection depths for AIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1317-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571378/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Needle Shield Size and Applied Force of Subcutaneous Autoinjectors Significantly Influence the Injection Depth.\",\"authors\":\"Anne-Sofie Madsen Staples, Mette Poulsen, Kezia Ann Friis Præstmark, Thomas Sparre, Marie Sand Traberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19322968241231996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines how shield-triggered autoinjectors (AIs), for subcutaneous drug delivery, affect injection depth. It focuses on shield size and applied force, parameters that could potentially lead to inadvertent intramuscular (IM) injections due to tissue compression.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A blinded ex-vivo study was performed to assess the impact of shield size and applied force on injection depth. Shields of 15, 20, and 30 mm diameters and forces from 2 to 10 N were investigated. The study involved 55 injections in three Landrace, Yorkshire, and Duroc (LYD) pigs, with injection depths measured with computed tomography (CT). An in-vivo study, involving 20 injections in three LYD pigs, controlled the findings, using fluoroscopy (FS) videos for depth measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CT study revealed that smaller shield sizes significantly increased injection depth. With a 15 mm diameter shield, 10 N applied force, and 5 mm needle protrusion, the injection depth exceeded the needle length by over 3 mm. Injection depth increased with higher applied forces until a plateau was reached around 8 N. Both applied force and size were significant factors for injection depth (analysis of variance [ANOVA], <i>P</i> < .05) in the CT study. The FS study confirmed the ex-vivo findings in an in-vivo setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study demonstrates that shield size has a greater impact on injection depth than the applied force. While conducted in porcine tissue, the study provides useful insights into the relative effects of shield size and applied force. Further investigations in humans are needed to confirm the predicted injection depths for AIs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1317-1325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571378/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968241231996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968241231996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究探讨了用于皮下给药的屏蔽触发式自动注射器(AI)如何影响注射深度。研究重点是防护罩的尺寸和作用力,这些参数可能会因组织挤压而导致肌肉内注射(IM)不慎:方法:进行了一项盲法体外研究,以评估屏蔽尺寸和作用力对注射深度的影响。研究了直径为 15、20 和 30 毫米的防护罩以及 2 至 10 牛的作用力。该研究涉及在三头兰德瑞斯、约克夏和杜洛克(LYD)猪身上进行的 55 次注射,注射深度通过计算机断层扫描(CT)进行测量。在三头 LYD 猪身上进行了 20 次注射的体内研究,利用透视 (FS) 视频测量注射深度,从而控制了研究结果:CT 研究显示,较小尺寸的防护罩可显著增加注射深度。在防护罩直径为 15 毫米、作用力为 10 牛、针头突出 5 毫米的情况下,注射深度超过针头长度 3 毫米以上。在 CT 研究中,作用力和尺寸都是影响注射深度的重要因素(方差分析 [ANOVA],P < .05)。FS研究在体内环境中证实了体外研究结果:研究表明,防护罩尺寸对注射深度的影响大于作用力。虽然研究是在猪组织中进行的,但该研究为了解屏蔽尺寸和作用力的相对影响提供了有用的见解。需要对人体进行进一步研究,以确认人工合成药物的预测注射深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Needle Shield Size and Applied Force of Subcutaneous Autoinjectors Significantly Influence the Injection Depth.

Background: This study examines how shield-triggered autoinjectors (AIs), for subcutaneous drug delivery, affect injection depth. It focuses on shield size and applied force, parameters that could potentially lead to inadvertent intramuscular (IM) injections due to tissue compression.

Method: A blinded ex-vivo study was performed to assess the impact of shield size and applied force on injection depth. Shields of 15, 20, and 30 mm diameters and forces from 2 to 10 N were investigated. The study involved 55 injections in three Landrace, Yorkshire, and Duroc (LYD) pigs, with injection depths measured with computed tomography (CT). An in-vivo study, involving 20 injections in three LYD pigs, controlled the findings, using fluoroscopy (FS) videos for depth measurement.

Results: The CT study revealed that smaller shield sizes significantly increased injection depth. With a 15 mm diameter shield, 10 N applied force, and 5 mm needle protrusion, the injection depth exceeded the needle length by over 3 mm. Injection depth increased with higher applied forces until a plateau was reached around 8 N. Both applied force and size were significant factors for injection depth (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P < .05) in the CT study. The FS study confirmed the ex-vivo findings in an in-vivo setting.

Conclusions: The study demonstrates that shield size has a greater impact on injection depth than the applied force. While conducted in porcine tissue, the study provides useful insights into the relative effects of shield size and applied force. Further investigations in humans are needed to confirm the predicted injection depths for AIs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信