中低收入国家的第一转诊医院:需要重新关注。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rosanna Jeffries Mazhar, Tamara Mulenga Willows, Suraj Bhattarai, Chit-Su Tinn, Nadine Misago, Mike English
{"title":"中低收入国家的第一转诊医院:需要重新关注。","authors":"Rosanna Jeffries Mazhar, Tamara Mulenga Willows, Suraj Bhattarai, Chit-Su Tinn, Nadine Misago, Mike English","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czad120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First referral hospitals (FRHs) are the hospitals closest to the community, which offer expertise or technologies to complement more widely available 'basic' ambulatory care or inpatient care. Despite having been a subject of interest in global health policy in the latter half of the 20th century, in more recent decades, they appear to have been overshadowed. This paper reviews what is understood by FRH, drawing on both academic and policy literature, complemented by specific country case studies. We undertook three reviews: a grey literature review of global and regional policy reports and documents, a structured review of the academic literature on FRH and a review of FRH-related policies in eight countries. Our findings indicate that there is confusion regarding the definitions and roles of FRH; they have fallen off the policy agenda globally and they suffer from lack of advocates in part related to the absence of cohesive definition. Meanwhile, these facilities continue to fulfil important functions in health systems in low- and middle-income countries, and expectations for service delivery remain high. In light of these findings, this paper calls for renewed interest and investment in FRH from the global health academic and policy-making community.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11031140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First referral hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: the need for a renewed focus.\",\"authors\":\"Rosanna Jeffries Mazhar, Tamara Mulenga Willows, Suraj Bhattarai, Chit-Su Tinn, Nadine Misago, Mike English\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czad120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>First referral hospitals (FRHs) are the hospitals closest to the community, which offer expertise or technologies to complement more widely available 'basic' ambulatory care or inpatient care. Despite having been a subject of interest in global health policy in the latter half of the 20th century, in more recent decades, they appear to have been overshadowed. This paper reviews what is understood by FRH, drawing on both academic and policy literature, complemented by specific country case studies. We undertook three reviews: a grey literature review of global and regional policy reports and documents, a structured review of the academic literature on FRH and a review of FRH-related policies in eight countries. Our findings indicate that there is confusion regarding the definitions and roles of FRH; they have fallen off the policy agenda globally and they suffer from lack of advocates in part related to the absence of cohesive definition. Meanwhile, these facilities continue to fulfil important functions in health systems in low- and middle-income countries, and expectations for service delivery remain high. In light of these findings, this paper calls for renewed interest and investment in FRH from the global health academic and policy-making community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11031140/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad120\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czad120","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一转诊医院(FRHs)是最接近社区的医院,它们提供专业知识或技术,以补充更广泛提供的 "基本 "非住院治疗或住院治疗。尽管在 20 世纪后半叶,首诊医院一直是全球卫生政策关注的主题,但在最近几十年,首诊医院似乎被蒙上了阴影。本文借鉴学术和政策文献,并辅以具体国家的案例研究,回顾了人们对 FRH 的理解。我们进行了三方面的回顾:对全球和地区政策报告和文件的灰色文献回顾,对有关首次报告和后续报告的学术文献的结构性回顾,以及对八个国家与首次报告和后续报告相关的政策的回顾。我们的研究结果表明,对于 FRH 的定义和作用存在混淆;在全球范围内,FRH 已经淡出了政策议程,它们缺乏拥护者,部分原因与缺乏统一的定义有关。与此同时,这些设施继续在中低收入国家的卫生系统中发挥着重要作用,人们对其提供服务的期望仍然很高。鉴于这些发现,本文呼吁全球卫生学术界和决策界重新关注和投资于 FRH。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First referral hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: the need for a renewed focus.

First referral hospitals (FRHs) are the hospitals closest to the community, which offer expertise or technologies to complement more widely available 'basic' ambulatory care or inpatient care. Despite having been a subject of interest in global health policy in the latter half of the 20th century, in more recent decades, they appear to have been overshadowed. This paper reviews what is understood by FRH, drawing on both academic and policy literature, complemented by specific country case studies. We undertook three reviews: a grey literature review of global and regional policy reports and documents, a structured review of the academic literature on FRH and a review of FRH-related policies in eight countries. Our findings indicate that there is confusion regarding the definitions and roles of FRH; they have fallen off the policy agenda globally and they suffer from lack of advocates in part related to the absence of cohesive definition. Meanwhile, these facilities continue to fulfil important functions in health systems in low- and middle-income countries, and expectations for service delivery remain high. In light of these findings, this paper calls for renewed interest and investment in FRH from the global health academic and policy-making community.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信