带有自动注射器或针头安全装置的新型奥马珠单抗预灌封注射器与现有预灌封注射器的生物等效性比较:健康志愿者随机对照试验》。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ramachandra Sangana, Yan Xu, Bharti Shah, Xianbin Tian, Julia Zack, Kasra Shakeri-Nejad, Sampath Kalluri, Ieuan Jones, Monica Ligueros-Saylan, Angel Fowler Taylor, Devendra Kumar Jain, Emil Scosyrev, Alkaz Uddin, Nathalie Laurent, Paola Paganoni
{"title":"带有自动注射器或针头安全装置的新型奥马珠单抗预灌封注射器与现有预灌封注射器的生物等效性比较:健康志愿者随机对照试验》。","authors":"Ramachandra Sangana,&nbsp;Yan Xu,&nbsp;Bharti Shah,&nbsp;Xianbin Tian,&nbsp;Julia Zack,&nbsp;Kasra Shakeri-Nejad,&nbsp;Sampath Kalluri,&nbsp;Ieuan Jones,&nbsp;Monica Ligueros-Saylan,&nbsp;Angel Fowler Taylor,&nbsp;Devendra Kumar Jain,&nbsp;Emil Scosyrev,&nbsp;Alkaz Uddin,&nbsp;Nathalie Laurent,&nbsp;Paola Paganoni","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody currently approved for the treatment of asthma, nasal polyps/chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Omalizumab is available as an injection in a prefilled syringe (PFS) with a needle safety device (NSD). New product configurations were developed to reduce the number of injections per dose administration, improve patient convenience and treatment compliance. The objective of this randomized open-label 12-week study was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between (1) new PFS with autoinjector (PFS-AI), (2) new PFS-NSD configuration, and (3) current PFS-NSD configuration. Each new configuration was considered bioequivalent to the current configuration if the confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) were contained in the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable measurement (AUC<sub>last</sub>), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>). Safety was assessed throughout the study. In total, 193 healthy volunteers were randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-AI (n = 66), omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-NSD (n = 64), or omalizumab 2×150 mg/1 mL via current PFS-NSD (n = 63). Comparing new PFS-AI versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: C<sub>max</sub>, 1.085; AUC<sub>last</sub>, 1.093; AUC<sub>inf</sub>, 1.100. Comparing new PFS-NSD versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: C<sub>max</sub>, 1.006; AUC<sub>last</sub>, 1.016; AUC<sub>inf</sub>, 1.027. The 95% CIs for all GMR parameters were contained within the 0.80-1.25 range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of omalizumab. Single-dose omalizumab administered as the new PFS-AI or new PFS-NSD was bioequivalent to the current PFS-NSD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1373","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioequivalence Between a New Omalizumab Prefilled Syringe With an Autoinjector or with a Needle Safety Device Compared with the Current Prefilled Syringe: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers\",\"authors\":\"Ramachandra Sangana,&nbsp;Yan Xu,&nbsp;Bharti Shah,&nbsp;Xianbin Tian,&nbsp;Julia Zack,&nbsp;Kasra Shakeri-Nejad,&nbsp;Sampath Kalluri,&nbsp;Ieuan Jones,&nbsp;Monica Ligueros-Saylan,&nbsp;Angel Fowler Taylor,&nbsp;Devendra Kumar Jain,&nbsp;Emil Scosyrev,&nbsp;Alkaz Uddin,&nbsp;Nathalie Laurent,&nbsp;Paola Paganoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody currently approved for the treatment of asthma, nasal polyps/chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Omalizumab is available as an injection in a prefilled syringe (PFS) with a needle safety device (NSD). New product configurations were developed to reduce the number of injections per dose administration, improve patient convenience and treatment compliance. The objective of this randomized open-label 12-week study was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between (1) new PFS with autoinjector (PFS-AI), (2) new PFS-NSD configuration, and (3) current PFS-NSD configuration. Each new configuration was considered bioequivalent to the current configuration if the confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) were contained in the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable measurement (AUC<sub>last</sub>), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>). Safety was assessed throughout the study. In total, 193 healthy volunteers were randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-AI (n = 66), omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-NSD (n = 64), or omalizumab 2×150 mg/1 mL via current PFS-NSD (n = 63). Comparing new PFS-AI versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: C<sub>max</sub>, 1.085; AUC<sub>last</sub>, 1.093; AUC<sub>inf</sub>, 1.100. Comparing new PFS-NSD versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: C<sub>max</sub>, 1.006; AUC<sub>last</sub>, 1.016; AUC<sub>inf</sub>, 1.027. The 95% CIs for all GMR parameters were contained within the 0.80-1.25 range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of omalizumab. Single-dose omalizumab administered as the new PFS-AI or new PFS-NSD was bioequivalent to the current PFS-NSD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpdd.1373\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpdd.1373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥马珠单抗是一种抗 IgE 单克隆抗体,目前已获准用于治疗哮喘、鼻息肉/慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉以及慢性自发性荨麻疹。奥马珠单抗以带针头安全装置(NSD)的预灌装注射器(PFS)形式提供。开发新产品配置是为了减少每次给药的注射次数,提高患者的便利性和治疗依从性。这项为期 12 周的随机开放标签研究旨在证明(1)带自动注射器的新型 PFS(PFS-AI)、(2)新型 PFS-NSD 配置和(3)当前 PFS-NSD 配置之间的药代动力学生物等效性。如果最大浓度 (Cmax)、直至最后一次可量化测量的浓度-时间曲线下面积 (AUClast) 和外推至无穷大的 AUC (AUCinf) 的几何平均比 (GMR) 的置信区间 (CI) 在 0.80-1.25 范围内,则认为每种新配置与当前配置具有生物等效性。安全性评估贯穿整个研究过程。共有193名健康志愿者按1:1:1的比例随机接受了奥马珠单抗1×300毫克/2毫升(通过新的PFS-AI)(n = 66)、奥马珠单抗1×300毫克/2毫升(通过新的PFS-NSD)(n = 64)或奥马珠单抗2×150毫克/1毫升(通过当前的PFS-NSD)(n = 63)。新 PFS-AI 与当前 PFS-NSD 的 GMRs 比较如下:Cmax,1.085;AUClast,1.093;AUCinf,1.100。新的 PFS-NSD 与当前的 PFS-NSD 相比,GMR 分别为:Cmax , 1.006; AUClast , 1.093; AUCinf , 1.100:Cmax,1.006;AUClast,1.016;AUCinf,1.027。所有 GMR 参数的 95% CI 均在 0.80-1.25 范围内。安全性结果与奥马珠单抗的已知安全性特征一致。单剂量奥马珠单抗作为新的PFS-AI或新的PFS-NSD给药与目前的PFS-NSD具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bioequivalence Between a New Omalizumab Prefilled Syringe With an Autoinjector or with a Needle Safety Device Compared with the Current Prefilled Syringe: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Bioequivalence Between a New Omalizumab Prefilled Syringe With an Autoinjector or with a Needle Safety Device Compared with the Current Prefilled Syringe: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody currently approved for the treatment of asthma, nasal polyps/chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Omalizumab is available as an injection in a prefilled syringe (PFS) with a needle safety device (NSD). New product configurations were developed to reduce the number of injections per dose administration, improve patient convenience and treatment compliance. The objective of this randomized open-label 12-week study was to demonstrate pharmacokinetic bioequivalence between (1) new PFS with autoinjector (PFS-AI), (2) new PFS-NSD configuration, and (3) current PFS-NSD configuration. Each new configuration was considered bioequivalent to the current configuration if the confidence intervals (CIs) for the geometric mean ratios (GMR) were contained in the 0.80-1.25 range for maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the concentration-time curve until the last quantifiable measurement (AUClast), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf). Safety was assessed throughout the study. In total, 193 healthy volunteers were randomized at 1:1:1 ratio to omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-AI (n = 66), omalizumab 1×300 mg/2 mL via new PFS-NSD (n = 64), or omalizumab 2×150 mg/1 mL via current PFS-NSD (n = 63). Comparing new PFS-AI versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: Cmax, 1.085; AUClast, 1.093; AUCinf, 1.100. Comparing new PFS-NSD versus current PFS-NSD, the GMRs were: Cmax, 1.006; AUClast, 1.016; AUCinf, 1.027. The 95% CIs for all GMR parameters were contained within the 0.80-1.25 range. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile of omalizumab. Single-dose omalizumab administered as the new PFS-AI or new PFS-NSD was bioequivalent to the current PFS-NSD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信