实施综合长期数据库以推进劳伦森大湖流域基于生态系统的管理的可行性

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Richard R. Budnik , Kenneth T. Frank , Lyndsie M. Collis , Michael E. Fraker , Lacey A. Mason , Andrew M. Muir , Steven A. Pothoven , David F. Clapp , Paris D. Collingsworth , Joel C. Hoffman , James M. Hood , Timothy B. Johnson , Marten A. Koops , Lars G. Rudstam , Stuart A. Ludsin
{"title":"实施综合长期数据库以推进劳伦森大湖流域基于生态系统的管理的可行性","authors":"Richard R. Budnik ,&nbsp;Kenneth T. Frank ,&nbsp;Lyndsie M. Collis ,&nbsp;Michael E. Fraker ,&nbsp;Lacey A. Mason ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Muir ,&nbsp;Steven A. Pothoven ,&nbsp;David F. Clapp ,&nbsp;Paris D. Collingsworth ,&nbsp;Joel C. Hoffman ,&nbsp;James M. Hood ,&nbsp;Timothy B. Johnson ,&nbsp;Marten A. Koops ,&nbsp;Lars G. Rudstam ,&nbsp;Stuart A. Ludsin","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The North American Great Lakes have been experiencing dramatic change during the past half-century, highlighting the need for holistic, ecosystem-based approaches to management. To assess interest in ecosystem-based management (EBM), including the value of a comprehensive public database that could serve as a repository for the numerous physical, chemical, and biological monitoring Great Lakes datasets that exist, a two-day workshop was organized, which was attended by 40+ Great Lakes researchers, managers, and stakeholders. While we learned during the workshop that EBM is not an explicit mission of many of the participating research, monitoring, and management agencies, most have been conducting research or monitoring activities that can support EBM. These contributions have ranged from single-resource (-sector) management to considering the ecosystem holistically in a decision-making framework. Workshop participants also identified impediments to implementing EBM, including: 1) high anticipated costs; 2) a lack of EBM success stories to garner agency buy-in; and 3) difficulty in establishing common objectives among groups with different mandates (e.g., water quality vs. fisheries production). We discussed as a group solutions to overcome these impediments, including construction of a comprehensive, research-ready database, a prototype of which was presented at the workshop. We collectively felt that such a database would offer a cost-effective means to support EBM approaches by facilitating research that could help identify useful ecosystem indicators and management targets and allow for management strategy evaluations that account for risk and uncertainty when contemplating future decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","volume":"50 2","pages":"Article 102308"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of implementing an integrated long-term database to advance ecosystem-based management in the Laurentian Great Lakes basin\",\"authors\":\"Richard R. Budnik ,&nbsp;Kenneth T. Frank ,&nbsp;Lyndsie M. Collis ,&nbsp;Michael E. Fraker ,&nbsp;Lacey A. Mason ,&nbsp;Andrew M. Muir ,&nbsp;Steven A. Pothoven ,&nbsp;David F. Clapp ,&nbsp;Paris D. Collingsworth ,&nbsp;Joel C. Hoffman ,&nbsp;James M. Hood ,&nbsp;Timothy B. Johnson ,&nbsp;Marten A. Koops ,&nbsp;Lars G. Rudstam ,&nbsp;Stuart A. Ludsin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jglr.2024.102308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The North American Great Lakes have been experiencing dramatic change during the past half-century, highlighting the need for holistic, ecosystem-based approaches to management. To assess interest in ecosystem-based management (EBM), including the value of a comprehensive public database that could serve as a repository for the numerous physical, chemical, and biological monitoring Great Lakes datasets that exist, a two-day workshop was organized, which was attended by 40+ Great Lakes researchers, managers, and stakeholders. While we learned during the workshop that EBM is not an explicit mission of many of the participating research, monitoring, and management agencies, most have been conducting research or monitoring activities that can support EBM. These contributions have ranged from single-resource (-sector) management to considering the ecosystem holistically in a decision-making framework. Workshop participants also identified impediments to implementing EBM, including: 1) high anticipated costs; 2) a lack of EBM success stories to garner agency buy-in; and 3) difficulty in establishing common objectives among groups with different mandates (e.g., water quality vs. fisheries production). We discussed as a group solutions to overcome these impediments, including construction of a comprehensive, research-ready database, a prototype of which was presented at the workshop. We collectively felt that such a database would offer a cost-effective means to support EBM approaches by facilitating research that could help identify useful ecosystem indicators and management targets and allow for management strategy evaluations that account for risk and uncertainty when contemplating future decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"volume\":\"50 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 102308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Great Lakes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000352\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0380133024000352","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的半个世纪里,北美五大湖经历了翻天覆地的变化,凸显了以生态系统为基础的综合管理方法的必要性。为了评估人们对基于生态系统的管理(EBM)的兴趣,包括建立一个综合公共数据库的价值,该数据库可作为现有的众多物理、化学和生物监测大湖数据集的存放处,我们组织了一次为期两天的研讨会,40 多名大湖研究人员、管理人员和利益相关者参加了此次研讨会。虽然我们在研讨会上了解到,EBM 并不是许多参与的研究、监测和管理机构的明确任务,但大多数机构一直在开展能够支持 EBM 的研究或监测活动。这些贡献包括从单一资源(部门)管理到在决策框架中全面考虑生态系统。研讨会与会者还指出了实施生态管理的障碍,包括1) 预期成本高昂;2) 缺乏 EBM 成功案例来赢得机构的支持;3) 不同任务的团体之间难以确定共同目标(例如,水质与渔业生产)。我们作为一个小组讨论了克服这些障碍的解决方案,包括建立一个全面的、可用于研究的数据库,其原型已在研讨会上展示。我们共同认为,这样一个数据库将为支持 EBM 方法提供一种具有成本效益的手段,它可以促进有助于确定有用的生态系统指标和管理目标的研究,并允许在考虑未来决策时考虑风险和不确定性的管理策略评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of implementing an integrated long-term database to advance ecosystem-based management in the Laurentian Great Lakes basin

The North American Great Lakes have been experiencing dramatic change during the past half-century, highlighting the need for holistic, ecosystem-based approaches to management. To assess interest in ecosystem-based management (EBM), including the value of a comprehensive public database that could serve as a repository for the numerous physical, chemical, and biological monitoring Great Lakes datasets that exist, a two-day workshop was organized, which was attended by 40+ Great Lakes researchers, managers, and stakeholders. While we learned during the workshop that EBM is not an explicit mission of many of the participating research, monitoring, and management agencies, most have been conducting research or monitoring activities that can support EBM. These contributions have ranged from single-resource (-sector) management to considering the ecosystem holistically in a decision-making framework. Workshop participants also identified impediments to implementing EBM, including: 1) high anticipated costs; 2) a lack of EBM success stories to garner agency buy-in; and 3) difficulty in establishing common objectives among groups with different mandates (e.g., water quality vs. fisheries production). We discussed as a group solutions to overcome these impediments, including construction of a comprehensive, research-ready database, a prototype of which was presented at the workshop. We collectively felt that such a database would offer a cost-effective means to support EBM approaches by facilitating research that could help identify useful ecosystem indicators and management targets and allow for management strategy evaluations that account for risk and uncertainty when contemplating future decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Great Lakes Research
Journal of Great Lakes Research 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Published six times per year, the Journal of Great Lakes Research is multidisciplinary in its coverage, publishing manuscripts on a wide range of theoretical and applied topics in the natural science fields of biology, chemistry, physics, geology, as well as social sciences of the large lakes of the world and their watersheds. Large lakes generally are considered as those lakes which have a mean surface area of >500 km2 (see Herdendorf, C.E. 1982. Large lakes of the world. J. Great Lakes Res. 8:379-412, for examples), although smaller lakes may be considered, especially if they are very deep. We also welcome contributions on saline lakes and research on estuarine waters where the results have application to large lakes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信