台湾老年疗养院居民及其家人在开始讨论预先护理计划时遇到的障碍:定性研究

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Hsin-Tzu Sophie Lee PhD , Chia-Ling Yang PhD , Sei-Ven Leu PhD , Wen-Yu Hu PhD
{"title":"台湾老年疗养院居民及其家人在开始讨论预先护理计划时遇到的障碍:定性研究","authors":"Hsin-Tzu Sophie Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Chia-Ling Yang PhD ,&nbsp;Sei-Ven Leu PhD ,&nbsp;Wen-Yu Hu PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Taiwan, the Patients' Right to Autonomy Act was enacted in 2019. However, advance care planning (ACP) implementation rates remain low in long-term care facilities. <em>Aim:</em> This study explored the barriers to initiate a discussion about ACP among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive qualitative design was used. Face-to-face interviews were individually conducted with 38 participants (residents: 18; family members: 20), and data were analyzed through content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five themes were identified: (1) having cultural or spiritual concerns (both groups), (2) prioritizing the bigger picture (family) (both groups), (3) waiting for the right time (both groups), (4) feeling unsure (residents), and (5) following the pace of the residents (family members).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicate that discussing ACP with Chinese people and their families clashes with traditional Chinese culture. To implement ACP in long-term care facilities based in regions with ethnically Chinese populations, medical professionals must ensure that the residents and their family members understand advance directives and their role in ensuring a good death and must act as a bridge between residents and their family members to assist them in making consensual end-of-life-care decisions with residents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 151766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to initiate a discussion about advance care planning among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Hsin-Tzu Sophie Lee PhD ,&nbsp;Chia-Ling Yang PhD ,&nbsp;Sei-Ven Leu PhD ,&nbsp;Wen-Yu Hu PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In Taiwan, the Patients' Right to Autonomy Act was enacted in 2019. However, advance care planning (ACP) implementation rates remain low in long-term care facilities. <em>Aim:</em> This study explored the barriers to initiate a discussion about ACP among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A descriptive qualitative design was used. Face-to-face interviews were individually conducted with 38 participants (residents: 18; family members: 20), and data were analyzed through content analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Five themes were identified: (1) having cultural or spiritual concerns (both groups), (2) prioritizing the bigger picture (family) (both groups), (3) waiting for the right time (both groups), (4) feeling unsure (residents), and (5) following the pace of the residents (family members).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results indicate that discussing ACP with Chinese people and their families clashes with traditional Chinese culture. To implement ACP in long-term care facilities based in regions with ethnically Chinese populations, medical professionals must ensure that the residents and their family members understand advance directives and their role in ensuring a good death and must act as a bridge between residents and their family members to assist them in making consensual end-of-life-care decisions with residents.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"Article 151766\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189724000041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0897189724000041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景台湾于2019年颁布了《病人自主权法》。然而,在长期护理机构中,预先护理计划(ACP)的实施率仍然很低。目的:本研究探讨了台湾老年疗养院住户及其家属在启动关于 ACP 的讨论时遇到的障碍。方法:本研究采用了描述性定性设计。对 38 名参与者(住院者:18 人;家庭成员:20 人)进行了面对面访谈,并通过内容分析对数据进行了分析:(结果确定了五个主题:(1)有文化或精神方面的顾虑(两组均有);(2)以大局为重(家属)(两组均有);(3)等待合适的时机(两组均有);(4)感觉不确定(住院患者);(5)跟随住院患者的步伐(家属)。要在华人聚居地区的长期护理机构中实施 ACP,医务人员必须确保住院者及其家属了解预先医疗指示及其在确保良好死亡中的作用,并且必须成为住院者及其家属之间的桥梁,协助他们与住院者一起做出双方同意的临终关怀决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers to initiate a discussion about advance care planning among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families: A qualitative study

Barriers to initiate a discussion about advance care planning among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families: A qualitative study

Background

In Taiwan, the Patients' Right to Autonomy Act was enacted in 2019. However, advance care planning (ACP) implementation rates remain low in long-term care facilities. Aim: This study explored the barriers to initiate a discussion about ACP among older Taiwanese residents of nursing homes and their families.

Methods

A descriptive qualitative design was used. Face-to-face interviews were individually conducted with 38 participants (residents: 18; family members: 20), and data were analyzed through content analysis.

Results

Five themes were identified: (1) having cultural or spiritual concerns (both groups), (2) prioritizing the bigger picture (family) (both groups), (3) waiting for the right time (both groups), (4) feeling unsure (residents), and (5) following the pace of the residents (family members).

Conclusion

The results indicate that discussing ACP with Chinese people and their families clashes with traditional Chinese culture. To implement ACP in long-term care facilities based in regions with ethnically Chinese populations, medical professionals must ensure that the residents and their family members understand advance directives and their role in ensuring a good death and must act as a bridge between residents and their family members to assist them in making consensual end-of-life-care decisions with residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信