Madiha Masroor FCPS, Muhammad Imran Ansari FCPS, Madiha Umair MBBS, Lalarukh Taimoor FCPS, Mujtaba Hassan FCPS, Muhammad Sohaib Arif FCPS, Musa Karim MSc, Jawed Abubaker MD, FCCP
{"title":"类固醇与心肌梗塞:调查心肌梗塞后危重患者的安全性和短期死亡率","authors":"Madiha Masroor FCPS, Muhammad Imran Ansari FCPS, Madiha Umair MBBS, Lalarukh Taimoor FCPS, Mujtaba Hassan FCPS, Muhammad Sohaib Arif FCPS, Musa Karim MSc, Jawed Abubaker MD, FCCP","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.02.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Conventionally, in the pre-percutaneous intervention era, free wall rupture is reported to be a major concern for using steroids in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of steroids in critically ill post-MI patients in terms of hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included patients admitted to CCU diagnosed with MI, undergone revascularization, critically ill, and requiring mechanical ventilator (MV) support. The hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality were independently compared between steroid and non-steroid cohorts and propensity-matched non-steroid cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 312 patients were included, out of which steroids were used in 93 (29.8%) patients during their management. On periodic bedside echocardiography, no free wall rupture was documented in the steroid or non-steroid cohort. When compared steroids with a propensity-matched non-steroid cohort, MV duration >24 h was 66.7% vs. 59.1%; <em>p</em> = 0.288, major bleeding was 6.5% vs. 3.2%; <em>p</em> = 0.305, need for renal replacement therapy was 9.7% vs. 8.6%; <em>p</em> = 0.799, in-hospital mortality was 35.5% vs. 23.7%; <em>p</em> = 0.077, and 180-day mortality was 48.4% vs. 41.9%; <em>p</em> = 0.377, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.22 [95% CI: 0.80 to 1.88] compared to the propensity-matched non-steroid cohort. The ejection fraction (%) was found to be the independent predictor of 180-day mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, using steroids is safe in post-MI patients with no significant increase in short-term mortality risk.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steroids and myocardial infarction: Investigating safety and short-term mortality in critical post-myocardial infarction patients\",\"authors\":\"Madiha Masroor FCPS, Muhammad Imran Ansari FCPS, Madiha Umair MBBS, Lalarukh Taimoor FCPS, Mujtaba Hassan FCPS, Muhammad Sohaib Arif FCPS, Musa Karim MSc, Jawed Abubaker MD, FCCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.02.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Conventionally, in the pre-percutaneous intervention era, free wall rupture is reported to be a major concern for using steroids in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of steroids in critically ill post-MI patients in terms of hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We included patients admitted to CCU diagnosed with MI, undergone revascularization, critically ill, and requiring mechanical ventilator (MV) support. The hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality were independently compared between steroid and non-steroid cohorts and propensity-matched non-steroid cohorts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 312 patients were included, out of which steroids were used in 93 (29.8%) patients during their management. On periodic bedside echocardiography, no free wall rupture was documented in the steroid or non-steroid cohort. When compared steroids with a propensity-matched non-steroid cohort, MV duration >24 h was 66.7% vs. 59.1%; <em>p</em> = 0.288, major bleeding was 6.5% vs. 3.2%; <em>p</em> = 0.305, need for renal replacement therapy was 9.7% vs. 8.6%; <em>p</em> = 0.799, in-hospital mortality was 35.5% vs. 23.7%; <em>p</em> = 0.077, and 180-day mortality was 48.4% vs. 41.9%; <em>p</em> = 0.377, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.22 [95% CI: 0.80 to 1.88] compared to the propensity-matched non-steroid cohort. The ejection fraction (%) was found to be the independent predictor of 180-day mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98].</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In conclusion, using steroids is safe in post-MI patients with no significant increase in short-term mortality risk.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002962924011005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002962924011005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Steroids and myocardial infarction: Investigating safety and short-term mortality in critical post-myocardial infarction patients
Background
Conventionally, in the pre-percutaneous intervention era, free wall rupture is reported to be a major concern for using steroids in myocardial infarction (MI) patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the use of steroids in critically ill post-MI patients in terms of hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality.
Methods
We included patients admitted to CCU diagnosed with MI, undergone revascularization, critically ill, and requiring mechanical ventilator (MV) support. The hospital course and short-term (up to 180-day) mortality were independently compared between steroid and non-steroid cohorts and propensity-matched non-steroid cohorts.
Results
A total of 312 patients were included, out of which steroids were used in 93 (29.8%) patients during their management. On periodic bedside echocardiography, no free wall rupture was documented in the steroid or non-steroid cohort. When compared steroids with a propensity-matched non-steroid cohort, MV duration >24 h was 66.7% vs. 59.1%; p = 0.288, major bleeding was 6.5% vs. 3.2%; p = 0.305, need for renal replacement therapy was 9.7% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.799, in-hospital mortality was 35.5% vs. 23.7%; p = 0.077, and 180-day mortality was 48.4% vs. 41.9%; p = 0.377, respectively. The hazard ratio was 1.22 [95% CI: 0.80 to 1.88] compared to the propensity-matched non-steroid cohort. The ejection fraction (%) was found to be the independent predictor of 180-day mortality with an adjusted odds ratio of 0.92 [95% CI: 0.86 to 0.98].
Conclusions
In conclusion, using steroids is safe in post-MI patients with no significant increase in short-term mortality risk.