优化能源股票投资组合的新颖后悔-欣喜交叉效率法

IF 6.7 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Yong-Jun Liu , Guo-Sen Yang , Wei-Guo Zhang
{"title":"优化能源股票投资组合的新颖后悔-欣喜交叉效率法","authors":"Yong-Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Guo-Sen Yang ,&nbsp;Wei-Guo Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As climate change intensifies, more and more people realize that it is necessary and urgent to optimize energy structure through constructing energy asset portfolios. However, most of existing literature on energy asset portfolio models neglects real market restrictions, and the related portfolio performance evaluation approaches ignore the impact of the psychological factors of decision makers (DMs) on evaluation results, which limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, we first present a mean-WMCVaR (MWMC) model for energy stock portfolio selection with real features. Then, we employ the proposed MWMC model and its closely related works to yield a set of investment schemes and determine their characteristic index values including mean, WMCVaR, carbon intensity and ESG. Subsequently, we present a novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency (NRRCE) approach to evaluate the performance of these investment schemes, and then make a comparison with the ones of the other seven competitive evaluation approaches by using an empirical example. Empirical results show that the proposed MWMC model can yield an optimal investment scheme with a better trade-off between economic and ecological benefits, and our NRRCE approach can effectively provide reasonable and reliable evaluation results for different investment schemes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization\",\"authors\":\"Yong-Jun Liu ,&nbsp;Guo-Sen Yang ,&nbsp;Wei-Guo Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As climate change intensifies, more and more people realize that it is necessary and urgent to optimize energy structure through constructing energy asset portfolios. However, most of existing literature on energy asset portfolio models neglects real market restrictions, and the related portfolio performance evaluation approaches ignore the impact of the psychological factors of decision makers (DMs) on evaluation results, which limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, we first present a mean-WMCVaR (MWMC) model for energy stock portfolio selection with real features. Then, we employ the proposed MWMC model and its closely related works to yield a set of investment schemes and determine their characteristic index values including mean, WMCVaR, carbon intensity and ESG. Subsequently, we present a novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency (NRRCE) approach to evaluate the performance of these investment schemes, and then make a comparison with the ones of the other seven competitive evaluation approaches by using an empirical example. Empirical results show that the proposed MWMC model can yield an optimal investment scheme with a better trade-off between economic and ecological benefits, and our NRRCE approach can effectively provide reasonable and reliable evaluation results for different investment schemes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000185\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324000185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着气候变化的加剧,越来越多的人意识到通过构建能源资产组合优化能源结构的必要性和紧迫性。然而,现有的能源资产组合模型文献大多忽视了现实市场的限制,相关的组合绩效评估方法也忽视了决策者(DMs)的心理因素对评估结果的影响,从而限制了其应用。为了克服这些局限性,我们首先提出了一种具有真实特征的能源股票投资组合选择均值-WMCVaR(MWMC)模型。然后,我们利用所提出的 MWMC 模型及其密切相关的工作来得出一组投资方案,并确定其特征指标值,包括均值、WMCVaR、碳强度和 ESG。随后,我们提出了一种新颖的遗憾-欣喜交叉效率(NRRCE)方法来评价这些投资方案的绩效,并通过一个实证例子与其他七种竞争性评价方法进行了比较。实证结果表明,所提出的 MWMC 模型可以得出经济效益与生态效益权衡较好的最优投资方案,而我们的 NRRCE 方法可以有效地为不同的投资方案提供合理可靠的评价结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency approach for energy stock portfolio optimization

As climate change intensifies, more and more people realize that it is necessary and urgent to optimize energy structure through constructing energy asset portfolios. However, most of existing literature on energy asset portfolio models neglects real market restrictions, and the related portfolio performance evaluation approaches ignore the impact of the psychological factors of decision makers (DMs) on evaluation results, which limit their applications. To overcome these limitations, we first present a mean-WMCVaR (MWMC) model for energy stock portfolio selection with real features. Then, we employ the proposed MWMC model and its closely related works to yield a set of investment schemes and determine their characteristic index values including mean, WMCVaR, carbon intensity and ESG. Subsequently, we present a novel regret-rejoice cross-efficiency (NRRCE) approach to evaluate the performance of these investment schemes, and then make a comparison with the ones of the other seven competitive evaluation approaches by using an empirical example. Empirical results show that the proposed MWMC model can yield an optimal investment scheme with a better trade-off between economic and ecological benefits, and our NRRCE approach can effectively provide reasonable and reliable evaluation results for different investment schemes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信