Felipe Sanches Lopez, Cristiano Rodrigues de Mattos
{"title":"冷战时期的美国科学教育","authors":"Felipe Sanches Lopez, Cristiano Rodrigues de Mattos","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00502-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Several countries have implemented educational changes in recent years, most of which generally happen suddenly and abruptly to appease sectors of society that benefit economically. Most educational change watchword is innovation, fulfilling more a propaganda space than a fundamental educational transformation. One of the foremost educational innovations in science education was the Physical Science Study Committee (PSSC), a physics education project aimed at improving science education in the USA during the Cold War. In this period, teacher training was critical to the science education imbroglio in which the country found itself, primarily due to the long period the government made little educational investment. The reactions came with the creation of multiple committees, including the PSSC, when the nation faced a shortage of qualified teachers and a crisis in training scientists. In this investigation, we seek to understand the relationship between economic policies and science education in the USA by analysing the administration’s economic reports through document analysis methodology. The findings show that science education had three different levels of priority throughout the period: the first, when it was deemed irrelevant; the second, when it started to be seen as imperative for economic and technological development; and the third, when science education was considered essential for national security. This historical case study shows the lasting impacts of treating education as unimportant, even for a short period, and the enormous inertia to move the complex economic and political network between society’s superstructure and infrastructure activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science Education in the USA During the Cold War\",\"authors\":\"Felipe Sanches Lopez, Cristiano Rodrigues de Mattos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11191-024-00502-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Several countries have implemented educational changes in recent years, most of which generally happen suddenly and abruptly to appease sectors of society that benefit economically. Most educational change watchword is innovation, fulfilling more a propaganda space than a fundamental educational transformation. One of the foremost educational innovations in science education was the Physical Science Study Committee (PSSC), a physics education project aimed at improving science education in the USA during the Cold War. In this period, teacher training was critical to the science education imbroglio in which the country found itself, primarily due to the long period the government made little educational investment. The reactions came with the creation of multiple committees, including the PSSC, when the nation faced a shortage of qualified teachers and a crisis in training scientists. In this investigation, we seek to understand the relationship between economic policies and science education in the USA by analysing the administration’s economic reports through document analysis methodology. The findings show that science education had three different levels of priority throughout the period: the first, when it was deemed irrelevant; the second, when it started to be seen as imperative for economic and technological development; and the third, when science education was considered essential for national security. This historical case study shows the lasting impacts of treating education as unimportant, even for a short period, and the enormous inertia to move the complex economic and political network between society’s superstructure and infrastructure activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Education\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00502-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00502-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Several countries have implemented educational changes in recent years, most of which generally happen suddenly and abruptly to appease sectors of society that benefit economically. Most educational change watchword is innovation, fulfilling more a propaganda space than a fundamental educational transformation. One of the foremost educational innovations in science education was the Physical Science Study Committee (PSSC), a physics education project aimed at improving science education in the USA during the Cold War. In this period, teacher training was critical to the science education imbroglio in which the country found itself, primarily due to the long period the government made little educational investment. The reactions came with the creation of multiple committees, including the PSSC, when the nation faced a shortage of qualified teachers and a crisis in training scientists. In this investigation, we seek to understand the relationship between economic policies and science education in the USA by analysing the administration’s economic reports through document analysis methodology. The findings show that science education had three different levels of priority throughout the period: the first, when it was deemed irrelevant; the second, when it started to be seen as imperative for economic and technological development; and the third, when science education was considered essential for national security. This historical case study shows the lasting impacts of treating education as unimportant, even for a short period, and the enormous inertia to move the complex economic and political network between society’s superstructure and infrastructure activities.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]